The COVID-19 pandemic represents an enormous challenge for healthcare systems around the globe. Using original panel survey data for the case of Germany, this article studies how specific trust in the healthcare system to cope with this crisis has evolved during the course of the pandemic and whether this specific form of trust is associated with general political trust. The article finds strong evidence for a positive and robust association between generalized political trust and performance perceptions regarding the efficiency and fairness of the crisis response as well as individual treatment conditions. The article also shows that specific trust in healthcare remained relatively stable throughout 2020, but declined significantly in the spring of 2021.
AlbertsonBGadarianSK (2015) Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AresMBürgisserRHäusermannS (2021) Attitudinal polarization towards the redistributive role of the state in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties31(sup 1): 41–55.
3.
BartelsBL (2015) Beyond ‘fixed versus random effects’: a framework for improving substanative and statistical analysis of panel, time-series cross-sectional, and multilevel data. In: FranzeseRJ (ed) Quantitative Research in Political Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Volume IV, pp. 93–121.
4.
BauteSDe RuijterA (2021) EU health solidarity in times of crisis: explaining public preferences towards EU risk pooling for medicines. Journal of European Public PolicyOnline Advance Access. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1936129.
5.
BellAJonesK (2015) Explaining fixed effects: random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods3(1): 133–153.
6.
BolDGianiMBlaisA, et al. (2021) The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: some good news for democracy?European Journal of Political Research60(2): 497–505.
7.
BreznauN (2021) The welfare state and risk perceptions: the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic and public concern in 70 countries. European Societies, 23. sup 1: European Societies in the Time of the Coronavirus Crisis): S33–S46.
8.
CammettMLynchJBilevG (2016) The influence of private health care financing on citizen trust in government. Perspectives on Politics13(4): 938–957.
9.
ChristensenTLaegreidP (2005) Trust in government: the relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review28(4): 487–511.
10.
DiehlCWolterF (2021) Attitudes about containment measures during the 2020/2021 coronavirus pandemic: self-interest, or broader political orientations?Research & Politics8(3): 1–9.
11.
EdlundJ (2006) Trust in the capability of the welfare state and general welfare state support: Sweden 1997–2002. Acta Sociologica49(4): 395–417.
12.
FairbrotherM (2014) Two multilevel modeling techniques for analyzing comparative longitudinal survey datasets. Political Science Research and Methods2(1): 119–140.
13.
GabrielOWTrüdingerE-M (2011) Embellishing welfare state reforms? Political trust and the support for welfare state reforms in Germany. German Politics20(2): 273–292.
GrassoMKlicperová-BakerMKoosS, et al. (2021) The impact of the coronavirus crisis on European societies. What have we learnt and where do we go from here? Introduction to the COVID volume. European Societies23. (sup 1: European Societies in the Time of the Coronavirus Crisis): S2–S32.
16.
HabibovNCheungAAuchynnikavaA (2017) Does social trust increase willingness to pay taxes to improve public healthcare? Cross-sectional cross-country instrumental variable analysis. Social Science & Medicine189: 25–34.
17.
HabibovNAuchynnikavaALuoR, et al. (2018a) Who wants to pay more taxes to improve public health care?The International Journal of Health Planning and Management33(4): e944–e959.
18.
HabibovNCheungAAuchynnikavaA (2018b) Does institutional trust increase willingness to pay more taxes to support the welfare state?Sociological Spectrum38(1): 51–68.
19.
HabibovNLuoRAuchynnikavaA (2019) The effects of healthcare quality on the willingness to pay more taxes to improve public healthcare: testing two alternative hypotheses from the research literature. Annals of Global Health85(1): 131–214.
20.
HaugsgjerdAKumlinS (2020) Downbound spiral? Economic grievances, perceived social protection and political distrust. West European Politics43(4): 969–990.
21.
HetheringtonMJ (2005) Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
22.
ImmergutEMSchneiderSM (2020) Is it unfair for the affluent to be able to purchase ‘better’ healthcare? Existential standards and institutional norms in healthcare attitudes across 28 countries. Social Science & Medicine(1982)2020(267): 1–10.
23.
JensenC (2011) Marketization via compensation: health care and the politics of the right in advanced industrialized nations. The British Journal of Political Science41(4): 907–926.
24.
JensenC (2012) Labour market- versus life course-related social policies: understanding cross-programme differences. Journal of European Public Policy19(2): 275–291.
25.
JensenCNaumannE (2016) Increasing pressures and support for public healthcare in Europe. Health Policy120: 698–705.
26.
JensenCPetersenMB (2017) The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care. American Journal of Political Science61(1): 68–83.
27.
JordanJ (2010) Institutional feedback and support for the welfare state: the case of national health care. Comparative Political Studies43(7): 862–885.
28.
KikuzawaSOlafsdottirSPescosolidoBA (2008) Similar pressures, different contexts: public attitudes toward government intervention for health care in 21 nations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior49(December): 385–399.
29.
KumlinS (2013) Dissatisfied democrats, policy feedback and European welfare states, 1976–2001. In: ZmerliSHoogheM (eds) Political Trust: Why Context Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 163–185.
30.
KumlinS (2021) Quality of government and welfare state support. In: BauhrMBagenholmAGrimesM, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Quality of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 724–736.
31.
KumlinSStadelmann-SteffenIHaugsgjerdA (2017) Trust and the welfare state. In: UslanerEM (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
LarsenEG (2020) Personal politics? Healthcare policies, personal experiences and government attitudes. Journal of European Social Policy30(4): 467–479.
33.
LynchJ (2019) Regimes of Inequality: The Political Economy of Wealth and Health. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
LynchJGollustSE (2010) Playing fair: fairness beliefs and health policy preferences in the United States. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law35(6): 849–887.
35.
MargalitY (2019) Political responses to economic shocks. Annual Review of Political Science22: 277–295.
36.
MissinneSMeulemanBBrackeP (2013) The popular legitimacy of European healthcare systems: a multilevel analysis of 24 countries. Journal of European Social Policy23(3): 231–247.
37.
NaumannE (2014) Increasing conflict in times of retrenchment? Attitudes towards healthcare provision in Europe between 1996 and 2002. International Journal of Social Welfare23(3): 276–286.
38.
NaumannEMöhringKReifenscheidM, et al. (2020) COVID-19 policies in Germany and their social, political, and psychological consequences. European Policy Analysis2020(6): 191–202.
39.
OECD (2019) Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.
40.
ReeskensTMuisQSiebenI, et al. (2021) Stability or change of public opinion and values during the coronavirus crisis? Exploring Dutch longitudinal panel data. European Societies23(sup 1: European Societies in the Time of the Coronavirus Crisis): S153–S171.
41.
RoosmaFVan OorschotWGelissenJ (2014) The preferred role and perceived performance of the welfare state: European welfare attitudes from a multidimensional perspective. Social Science Research44(March): 200–210.
42.
RothsteinB (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
RothsteinBSamanniMTeorellJ (2012) Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the quality of government. European Political Science Review4(1): 1–28.
44.
RudolphTJ (2009) Political trust, ideology, and public support for tax cuts. Public Opinion Quarterly73(1): 144–158.
45.
RudolphTJEvansJ (2005) Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 660–671.
46.
SossJSchramSF (2007) A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review101(1): 111–127.
47.
SvallforsS (2002) Political trust and support for the welfare state: unpacking a supposed relationship. In: RothsteinBSteinmoS (eds) Restructuring the Welfare State: Political Institutions and Policy Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 184–205.
48.
ToikkoTRantanenT (2017) How does the welfare state model influence social political attitudes? An analysis of citizens’ concrete and abstract attitudes toward poverty. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy33(3): 201–224.
49.
UslanerEMBrownM (2005) Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research33(6): 868–894.
50.
WendtCNaumannE (2018) Demand for healthcare reform by public opinion and medical professionals: a comparative survey analysis. In: EbbinghausBNaumannE (eds) Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 129–152.
51.
WendtCKohlJMischkeM, et al. (2010) How do Europeans perceive their healthcare system? Patterns of satisfaction and preference for state involvement in the field of healthcare. European Sociological Review26(2): 177–192.
52.
WendtCMischkeMPfeiferM (2011) Welfare States and Public Opinion: Perceptions of Healthcare Systems, Family Policy and Benefits for the Unemployed and Poor in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
53.
ZhuLLipsmeyerCS (2015) Policy feedback and economic risk: the influence of privatization on social policy preferences. Journal of European Public Policy22(10): 1489–1511.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
