While anti-immigrant parties have been electorally successful in European parliaments, it is still unclear whether they have influenced policies. This article contributes by investigating the anti-immigrant party policy impact on a previously unexplored welfare policy area, that concerning the mobility of vulnerable European Union/European Economic Area citizens. In Sweden, the aid offered to these citizens varies a great deal in different municipalities. Furthermore, the largest anti-immigrant party (Sweden Democrats) has, unlike the mainstream political parties, preferences for a strict policy in line with so-called welfare chauvinism. Taking advantage of this subnational variation, our data give us a unique opportunity to investigate whether anti-immigrant party representation impacts welfare policy outcomes. The empirical findings show a negative correlation between Sweden Democrats’ representation and the aid offered and indicates that municipalities where Sweden Democrats holds a pivotal position offer less aid to vulnerable European Union/European Economic Area citizens. The hypothesis that these effects are conditional upon the ideology of the ruling coalition is, however, not supported.
AfonsoA (2015) Choosing Whom to Betray: Populist Right-Wing Parties, Welfare State Reforms and the Trade-Off between Office and Votes. European Political Science Review7 (2): 271–292.
2.
AkkermanT (2012a) Comparing Radical Right Parties in Government: Immigration and Integration Policies in Nine Countries (1996–2010). West European Politics35 (3): 511–529.
3.
AkkermanT (2012b) Immigration Policy and Electoral Competition in Western Europe: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Party Positions over the past Two Decades. Party Politics21 (1): 54–67.
4.
AlonsoSDa FonsecaSC (2011) Immigration, Left and Right. Party Politics18 (6): 865–884.
5.
ArzheimerK (2009) Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science53: 259–275.
6.
AylottNBolinN (2007) Towards a Two-Party System? The Swedish Parliamentary Election of September 2006. West European Politics30 (3): 621–633.
7.
AylottNBolinN (2015) Polarising Pluralism: The Swedish Parliamentary Election of September 2014. West European Politics38 (3): 730–740.
8.
BaleTGreen-PedersenCKrouwelAet al. (2010) If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe. Political Studies58: 410–426.
9.
BantingKGKymlickaW (2015) The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. 2015/73.
10.
BetzH-GJohnsonC (2004) Against the Current – Stemming the Tide: The Nostalgic Ideology of the Contemporary Radical Populist Right. Journal of Political Ideologies9 (3): 311–327.
11.
BolinNLidénGNyhlénJ (2014) Do Anti-Immigration Parties Matter? The Case of the Sweden Democrats and Local Refugee Policy. Scandinavian Political Studies37 (3): 323–343.
12.
BrochmanGHagelundA (2011) Migrants in the Scandinavian Welfare State. The Emergence of a Social Policy Problem. Nordic Journal of Migration Research1 (1): 13–24.
13.
CarejaRElmelund-PræstekærCKlitgaardMBet al. (2016) Direct and Indirect Welfare Chauvinism as Party Strategies: An Analysis of the Danish People’s Party. Scandinavian Political Studies39 (4): 435–457.
14.
CarterE (2002) Proportional Representation and the Fortunes of Right-Wing Extremist Parties. West European Politics25: 125–146.
15.
CarvalhoJ (2014) Impact of Extreme Right Parties on Immigration Policy. Comparing Britain, France and Italy, 1st edn. New York: Routledge.
16.
DahlströmCSundellA (2012) A Losing Gamble. How Mainstream Parties Facilitate Anti-Immigrant Party Success. Electoral Studies31: 353–363.
17.
De LangeSL (2012) New Alliances: Why Mainstream Parties Govern with Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties. Political Studies60: 899–918.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy65 (2): 135–150.
20.
DuncanF (2010) Immigration and Integration Policy and the Austrian Radical Right in Office: The FPÖ/BZÖ, 2000–2006. Contemporary Politics16 (4): 337–354.
21.
ErlingssonGÓVernbyKÖhrvallR (2014) The Single-Issue Party Thesis and the Sweden Democrats. Acta Politica49 (2): 196–216.
22.
FjertorpJ (2013) Hur påverkas kommuners ekonomi av befolkningsförändringar (No 17 in a Series of Reports by the National Municipality Research Programme; ed. BrorströmBRambergU). Göteborg: KFi.
23.
FolkeO (2014) Shades of Brown and Green: Party Effects in Proportional Election Systems. Journal of the European Economic Association12 (5): 1361–1395.
24.
GoodwinM (2011) Europe’s Radical Right: Support and Potential. Political Insight2 (3): 4–7.
25.
Green-PedersenCKrogstrupJ (2008) Immigration as a Political Issue in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Political Research47: 610–634.
26.
Hale WilliamsM (2006) The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties in West European Democracies, 1st edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
27.
HinnforsJSpeharABucken-KnappG (2012) The Missing Factor: Why Social Democracy Can Lead to Restrictive Immigration Policy. Journal of European Public Policy19 (4): 585–603.
KarlssonD (2007) Kommunstorlek och demokrati – en introduktion. In: JohanssonFKarlssonDJohanssonBet al. (eds) Kommunstorlek och demokrati. Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting, pp.7–22.
30.
LefkofridiZHorvathK (2012) Migration Issues and Representation in European Liberal Democracies. Representation48 (1): 29–46.
31.
LefkofridiZMichelE (2014) Exclusive Solidarity? Radical Right Parties and the Welfare State. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. 2014/120.
32.
LidénGNyhlénJ (2013) Explaining Local Swedish Refugee Policy. Journal of International Migration and Integration15 (3): 547–565.
33.
LoxboK (2010) The Impact of the Radical Right: Lessons from the Local Level in Sweden, 2002–2006. Scandinavian Political Studies33 (3): 295–315.
34.
MeguidBM (2005) Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review99 (3): 347–359.
35.
MontinSGranbergM (2013) Moderna kommuner, 4th edn.Stockholm: Liber.
36.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, 1st edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MuddeC (2013) Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?European Journal of Political Research52: 1–19.
38.
NilssonV (2012) Framgångsrik kommunal utveckling – Mot handlingsorientering (No 11 in a Series of Reports by the National Municipality Research Programme; ed. BrorströmBRambergU). Göteborg: KFi.
39.
NorrisP (2005) Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market, 1st edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
RydgrenJ (2003) Mesolevel Reasons for Racism and Xenophobia: Some Converging and Diverging Effects of Radical Right Populism in France and Sweden. European Journal of Social Theory6 (1): 45–68.
43.
RydgrenJ (2007) The Sociology of the Radical Right. Annual Review of Sociology33: 241–262.
44.
RydgrenJRuthP (2011) Voting for the Radical Right in Swedish Municipalities: Social Marginality and Ethnic Competition?Scandinavian Political Studies34 (3): 202–225.
Van der BrugWFennemaMTillieJ (2005) Why Some Radical Right Populist Parties Fail and Others Succeed. Comparative Political Studies38: 537–573.
58.
Van HeerdenSde LangeSLvan der BrugWet al. (2014) The Immigration and Integration Debate in the Netherlands: Discursive and Programmatic Reactions to the Rise of Anti-Immigration Parties. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40 (1): 119–136.
59.
Van SpanjeJ (2010) Contagious Parties – Anti-Immigrant Parties and Their Impact on Oterh Parties’ Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics16 (5): 563–586.
60.
WeibullLHolmbergSOscarssonHet al. (2014) Super-Riks-SOM 1986–2012 (v2014.1.2). Göteborgs Universitet, SOM-institutet. Available at: http://www.som.gu.se (accessed 15 March 2015).
61.
ZasloveA (2004) Closing the Door? The Ideology and Impact of Radical Right Populism on Immigration Policy in Austria and Italy. Journal of Political Ideologies9 (1): 99–118.
