We examine the degree to which party leaders dominate their parties over time and across countries and analyse how leadership domination relates to formal aspects of party organisation. Moreover, we analyse whether antidotes against leadership domination – widening the selectorate and increasing the membership – explain change in leadership domination. For this purpose, we use a new dataset that brings together different sources of party data over time and between countries. We find that leadership domination indeed has increased over time, but still a lot of variation exists between parties. We also demonstrate that widening the selectorate – for example, letting members elect the party leader – and increasing membership boosts leadership domination. In other words, the antidotes against leadership domination do not work.
AllernEHPedersenK (2007) The Impact of Party Organisational Changes on Democracy. West European Politics30(1): 68–92.
2.
ArmingeonKKnöpfelLWeisstannerD. (2013) Comparative Political Data Set I 1960–2011. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
3.
BilleL (2001) Democratizing a Democratic Procedure. Myth or Reality? Candidate Selection in Western European Parties, 1960–1990. Party Politics7(3): 363–380.
4.
BlythMKatzRS (2005) From Catch-All Politics to Cartelisation: The Political Economy of the Cartel Party. West European Politics28(1): 33–60.
5.
BolleyerN (2012) New Party Organization in Western Europe: Of Party Hierarchies, Stratarchies and Federations. Party Politics18(3): 315–336.
Bueno de MesquitaBMorrowJDSiversonRM. (2002) Political Institutions, Policy Choice and the Survival of Leaders. British Journal of Political Science32(4): 559–590.
8.
CrossWBlaisA (2011) Who Selects the Party Leader?Party Politics18(2): 127–150.
9.
CrossWYoungL (2004) The Contours of Political Party Membership in Canada. Party Politics10(4): 427–444.
10.
DahlRATufteER (1973) Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
DaltonRJWattenbergM (2002) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
DöringHManowP (2015) Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Available at: http://www.parlgov.org/ (accessed 26 October 2015).
13.
DuvergerM (1964) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen Books.
14.
Ennser-JedenastikLSchumacherG (2015) Why Some Leaders Die Hard (and Others Don’t): Party Goals, Party Institutions, and How They Interact. In: CrossWPiletJB (eds) The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.107–127.
15.
EpsteinLD (1967) Political Parties in Western Democracies. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
16.
GallagherMMarshM (2004) Party Membership in Ireland: The Members of Fine Gael. Party Politics10: 407–425.
17.
GaujaA (2014) The Construction of Party Membership. European Journal of Political Research54(2): 232–248.
18.
GigerNSchumacherG (2015) Integrated Party Organization Dataset (IPOD): V2. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PE8TWP (accessed 26 October 2015).
19.
HarmelRJandaK (1994a) An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change. Journal of Theoretical Politics6(3): 259–287.
HazanRYRahatG (2010) Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HeidarK (1994) The Polymorphic Nature of Party Membership. European Journal of Political Research25: 61–86.
23.
HeidarKSaglieJ (2003) A Decline of Linkage? Intra-Party Participation in Norway, 1991–2000. European Journal of Political Research42: 761–786.
24.
HopkinJPaolucciC (1999) New Parties and the Business Firm Model of Party Organization: Cases from Spain and Italy. European Journal of Political Research35(3): 307–339.
25.
JandaK (ed.) (1980) Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: The Free Press.
26.
KatzRS (2001) The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy. Party Politics7: 277–296.
27.
KatzRSMairP (1992) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook. London: SAGE.
28.
KatzRSMairP (1994) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: SAGE.
29.
KatzRSMairP (1995) Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
30.
KatzRSMairP (2002) The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Change in Twentieth-Century Democracies. In: GuntherRMonteroJRLinzJJ (eds) Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.113–135.
31.
KatzRSMairP (2009) The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement. Perspectives on Politics7(4): 753–766.
32.
KatzRSMairPBardiL. (1992) The Membership of Political Parties in European Democracies, 1960–1990. European Journal of Political Research22: 329–345.
33.
KenigO (2009a) Classifying Party Leaders’ Selection Methods in Parliamentary Democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties19(4): 433–447.
34.
KenigO (2009b) Democratization of Party Leadership Selection: Do Wider Selectorates Produce More Competitive Contests?Electoral Studies28(2): 240–247.
35.
KirchheimerO (1966) The Transformation of Western European Party Systems. In: LaPalombaraJWeinerM (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Merchantville, NJ: Yale University Press, pp.177–200.
36.
KitscheltHP (1988) Organization and Strategy of Belgian and West German Ecology Parties: A New Dynamic of Party Politics in Western Europe?Comparative Politics20(2): 127–154.
37.
KitscheltHP (2000) Citizens, Politicians, and Party Cartellization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-Industrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research37(2): 149–179.
38.
KitscheltHP (2013) Dataset of the Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project (DALP). Available at: https://sites.duke.edu/democracylinkage/ (accessed 26 October 2014).
39.
KöllnA-K (2015) The Effects of Membership Decline on Party Organisations in Europe. European Journal of Political Research. Epub ahead of print 20August2015. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12110.
40.
KöllnA-K (2016) Party Membership in Europe Testing Party-Level Explanations of Decline. Party Politics22: 465–477.
41.
KooleR (1996) Cadre, Catch-All or Cartel? A Comment on the Notion of the Cartel Party. Party Politics2(4): 507–523.
42.
KrouwelA (2003) Otto Kirchheimer and the Catch-All Party. West European Politics26(2): 23–40.
43.
LaverMHuntWB (1992) Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.
44.
LeDucL (2001) Democratizing Party Leadership Selection. Party Politics7(3): 323–341.
45.
LoxboK (2013) The Fate of Intra-Party Democracy: Leadership Autonomy and Activist Influence in the Mass Party and the Cartel Party. Party Politics19: 537–554.
46.
LundellK (2004) Determinants of Candidate Selection. The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective. Party Politics10(1): 25–47.
47.
MairP (1994) Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State. In: KatzRSMairP (eds) How Parties Organize. London: SAGE Publishing, pp.1–22.
48.
MairP (2013) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.
49.
MairPVan BiezenI (2001) Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000. Party Politics7(1): 5–21.
50.
MayJD (1973) Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity. Political Studies21: 135–151.
51.
MichelsR (1915) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Hearst’s International Library Co.
52.
OlsonM (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
53.
OstrogorskiM (1902) Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. New York: Macmillan Publishers.
54.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
PedersenHH (2010a) Differences and Changes in Party Organisations: Central Party Organisation versus Parliamentary Party Group Power. Journal of Legislative Studies16(2): 233–250.
56.
PedersenHH (2010b) How Intra-Party Power Relations Affect the Coalition Behaviour of Political Parties. Party Politics16(6): 737–754.
57.
PedersenHH (2012a) Policy-Seeking Parties in Multiparty Systems: Influence or Purity?Party Politics18: 297–314.
58.
PedersenHH (2012b) What Do Parties Want? Policy versus Office. West European Politics35(4): 37–41.
59.
PedersenKBilleLBuchR. (2004) Sleeping or Active Partners? Danish Party Members at the Turn of the Millennium. Party Politics10(4): 367–383.
60.
PiletJBCrossW (2014) The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies. London: Routledge.
61.
PoguntkeT (2002) Party Organizational Linkage: Parties without Firm Social Roots? In: LutherKRMüller-RommelF (eds) Political Parties in the New Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.43–62.
62.
PoguntkeTWebbP (2005) The Presidentialization of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
RohrschneiderRWhitefieldS (2009) Understanding Cleavages in Party Systems: Issue Position and Issue Salience in 13 Post-Communist Democracies. Comparative Political Studies42(2): 280–313.
64.
RohrschneiderRWhitefieldS (2012) The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
SafranW (2009) The Catch-All Party Revisited: Reflections of a Kirchheimer Student. Party Politics15(5): 543–554.
66.
SandriGPauwelsT (2010) Party Membership Role and Party Cartelization in Belgium and Italy: Two Faces of the Same Medal?Politics & Policy38(6): 1237–1266.
67.
SartoriG (1976) Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
ScarrowSE (1999) Parties and the Expansion of Direct Democracy: Who Benefits?Party Politics5: 341–362.
69.
ScarrowSE (2002) Parties without Members? Party Organization in a Changing Electoral Environment. In: DaltonRJWattenbergMP (eds) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.79–101.
70.
ScarrowSE (2007) Political Finance in Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of Political Science10: 193–210.
71.
SchumacherG (2012) ‘Marx’ or the Market: Social Democrats. The Intra-Party Balance of Power and When Social Democrats Enact Welfare State Retrenchment. West European Politics35: 1024–1043.
72.
SchumacherGDe VriesCEVisB (2013) Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives. Journal of Politics75(2): 464–477.
73.
SeydPWhiteleyPF (2003) British Party Members: An Overview. Party Politics10: 355–366.
74.
TanAC (1998) The Impacts of Party Membership Size: A Cross-National Analysis. Journal of Politics60(1): 188.
75.
Van BiezenIMairPPoguntkeT (2012) Going, Going, … Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research51(1): 24–56.
76.
Van HauteE. (2015) MAPP – Party Membership Figures in 32 Countries 1945–2014. MAPP Project Data Archive. Available at: http://www.projectmapp.eu (accessed 26 October 2015).
77.
WautersB (2013) Democratising Party Leadership Selection in Belgium: Motivations and Decision Makers. Political Studies62: 61–80.
78.
WebbP (2000) The Modern British Party System. London: SAGE.
79.
WeberM (2004) The Vocation Lectures. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
80.
WeldonS (2006) Downsize My Polity? The Impact of Size on Party Membership and Member Activism. Party Politics12(4): 467–481.
81.
WhiteleyPSeydP (2002) High-Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
82.
WolinetzSB (1977) The Dutch Labour Party: A Social Democratic Party in Transition. In: PatersonRJThomasAH (eds) Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe. London: Croom Helm, pp.67–98.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
