How we should teach mathematics has long been debated by advocates of different instructional approaches. These debates can lead to tensions that are difficult to navigate for those who are new to (or even veterans of) the profession. Educators often propose a “balance” of different approaches as a solution. Charles Munter considers whether such a balance is actually possible — and also considers whether some other questions may be more urgent.
AguirreJ.Mayfield-IngramK.MartinD. (2013). The impact of identity in K-8 mathematics: Rethinking equity-based practices. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
2.
AlfieriL.BrooksP.J.AldrichN.J.TenenbaumH.R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 (1), 1-18.
3.
BatteyD.NealR.A.LeyvaL.Adams-WigginsK. (2016). The interconnectedness of relational and content dimensions of quality instruction: Supportive teacher-student relationships in urban elementary mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 1-19.
4.
BoalerJ.GreenoJ.G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In BoalerJ. (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171-200). Ablex.
5.
BrownellW.A. (1956). Meaning and skill — Maintaining the balance. The Arithmetic Teacher, 3 (4), 129-142.
6.
CarpenterT.LehrerR. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In FennemaE.RombergT. (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19-32). Erlbaum.
7.
Celedon-PattichisS.RamirezN.G. (Eds.). (2012). Beyond good teaching: Advancing Mathematics Education for ELLs. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
8.
CobbP.WoodT.YackelE.McNealB. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29 (3), 573-604.
9.
CollinsA.BrownJ.S.HolumA. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15 (3), 6-11, 38-46.
10.
D’AmbrosioU. (1990). The role of mathematics education in building a democratic and just society. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10 (3), 20-23.
11.
DarraghL. (2013). Constructing confidence and identities of belonging in mathematics at the transition to secondary school. Research in Mathematics Education, 15 (3), 215-229.
12.
ErnestP. (2018). The ethics of mathematics: Is mathematics harmful? In ErnestP. (Ed.), The philosophy of mathematics education today (pp. 187-216). Springer.
13.
FreeburnB.ArbaughF. (2017). Supporting productive struggle with communication moves. The Mathematics Teacher, 111 (3), 176-181.
14.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniv. ed.). Bloomsbury.
15.
GoosM. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35 (4), 258-291.
16.
GresalfiM.MartinT.HandV.GreenoJ. (2009). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 49-70.
17.
GutiérrezR. (1999). Advancing urban Latina/o youth in mathematics: Lessons from an effective high school mathematics department. The Urban Review, 31 (3), 263-281.
18.
HiebertJ. (2013). The constantly underestimated challenge of improving mathematics instruction. In LeathamK.R. (Ed.), Vital directions for mathematics education research (pp. 45-56). Springer.
19.
HiebertJ.GrouwsD.A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In LesterF.K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Information Age.
20.
HiebertJ.LefevreP. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In HiebertJ. (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Erlbaum.
21.
KilpatrickJ.SwaffordJ.FindellB. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
22.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teaching for African-American students. Jossey-Bass.
23.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35 (7), 3-12.
24.
LobatoJ.ClarkeD.EllisA.B. (2005). Initiating and eliciting in teaching: A reformulation of telling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36 (2), 101-136.
25.
MartinD.B. (2015). The collective Black and “principles to actions.”Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 8 (1), 17-23.
26.
MunterC.SteinM.K.SmithM.S. (2015a). Dialogic and direct instruction: Two distinct models of mathematics instruction and the debate(s) surrounding them. Teachers College Record, 117 (11), 1-32.
27.
MunterC.SteinM.K.SmithM.S. (2015b). Is there a common pedagogical core? Examining instructional practices of competing models of mathematics teaching. NCSM Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 16 (2), 3-13.
28.
MyersM. (2022). Learning trajectories research needs a hard reset: Using PCTM to center cognition, context, and culture. In LischkaA.E.DyerE.B.JonesR.S.LovettJ.N.StrayerJ.DrownS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 62-78). Middle Tennessee State University.
29.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2018). Catalyzing change in high school mathematics: Initiating critical conversations.
30.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
31.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core state standards for mathematics. www.corestandards.org
32.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education.
33.
NguyenP.MunterC. (2024). Secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ perceptions of program (in)coherence. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27, 441-477.
34.
PowellS.R.HughesE.M.PeltierC. (2022). Myths that undermine maths teaching [White paper]. Centre for Independent Studies.
35.
RosenshineB. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36 (1), 12-19, 39.
36.
SchwartzD.L.BransfordJ.D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (4), 475-522.
37.
ShahN. (2019). Should there be less mathematics education? In OttenS.CandelaA.G.de AraujoZ.HainesC.MunterC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Forty-First Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 29-32). University of Missouri.
38.
SilverE.A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29 (3), 75-80.
39.
SmithM.SteinM.K. (2011). 5 Practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
