Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-2
The Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Extremity Functions and Functional Independence in Geriatric Individuals With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study
Stroke often leads to impaired motor functions, particularly in upper extremities, making functional recovery essential for quality of life and independence. This study aims to examine effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper extremity functions and activities of daily living in rehabilitation of geriatric patients with chronic stroke.
Methods
Geriatric participants who had a stroke at least six months prior were randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving both conventional physiotherapy and robot-assisted therapy (ReoGo end-effector robotic system) or a control group with conventional physiotherapy only. Intervention group participated in 60-min ReoGo sessions along with daily physiotherapy over four weeks. Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment Scale and Functional Independence Measure evaluated motor functions and daily living independence, respectively. Pre- and post-treatment results were statistically analyzed within and between groups.
Results
Among the 30 participants, those in intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in upper extremity functions and daily living independence compared to the control group (p < .05). While control group exhibited minor improvements, these changes were not statistically significant, underscoring the greater efficacy of combined approach.
Discussion
Robot-assisted therapy significantly enhances motor recovery, likely due to its support for neuroplasticity through repetitive, controlled movements. This aligns with existing research, emphasizing benefits of robot-assisted therapy for motor learning and functional gains. ReoGo device also positively affected motivation and engagement, highlighting its potential role in long-term stroke rehabilitation. Overall, robot-assisted therapy may be a promising approach to improve motor recovery and independence in post-stroke patients, enhancing both quality of life and functional independence in daily activities.
AkıncıM.BurakM.YaşarE.KılıçR. T. (2023). The effects of robot-assisted gait training and virtual reality on balance and gait in stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Gait & Posture, 103, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.05.013
2.
BonannoL.CannuliA.PignoloL.MarinoS.QuartaroneA.CalabròR. S.CerasaA. (2023). Neural plasticity changes induced by motor robotic rehabilitation in stroke patients: The contribution of functional neuroimaging. Bioengineering, 10(8), 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10080990
3.
BudhotaA.ChuaK. S.HussainA.KagerS.CherpinA.ContuS.VishwanathD.KuahC. W. K.NgC. Y.YamL. H. L.LohY. J.RajeswaranD. K.XiangL.BurdetE.CampoloD.CampoloD. (2021). Robotic assisted upper limb training post stroke: A randomized control trial using combinatory approach toward reducing workforce demands. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, Article 622014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.622014
4.
ChenL. (2020). Role of robotic rehabilitation in quality of life improvements for stroke patients. Journal of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, 29(6), 563–570.
5.
ColomboR.PisanoF.MazzoneA.DelconteC.MiceraS.CarrozzaM. C.DarioP.MinucoG.MinucoG. (2007). Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 4, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-3
DuncanP. W.ZorowitzR.BatesB.ChoiJ. Y.GlasbergJ. J.GrahamG. D.KatzR. C.LambertyK.RekerD. (2005). Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: A clinical practice guideline. Stroke, 36(9), e100–e143. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000180861.54180.FF
8.
FrenchB.ThomasL. H.CoupeJ.McMahonN. E.ConnellL.HarrisonJ.SuttonC. J.TishkovskayaS.WatkinsC. L. (2016). Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, 1465–1858. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006073.pub3
9.
GauthierL. V.TaubE.PerkinsC.OrtmannM.MarkV. W.UswatteG. (2008). Remodeling the brain: Plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke, 39(5), 1520–1525. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502229
10.
HarveyR. L. (2009). Improving poststroke recovery: Neuroplasticity and task-oriented training. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 11(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-009-0026-4
11.
HsiehY. W.WuC. Y.LiaoW. W.LinK. C.WuK. Y.LeeC. Y. (2011). Effects of treatment intensity in upper limb robot-assisted therapy for chronic stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25(6), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310394871
KeithR. A.GrangerC. V.HamiltonB. B.SherwinF. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 6–18.
14.
KutnerN. G.ZhangR.ButlerA. J.WolfS. L.AlbertsJ. L. (2010). Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy, 90(4), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090160
15.
KwakkelG.KollenB. J.KrebsH. I. (2008). Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307305457
LeeM. J.LeeJ. H.LeeS. M. (2018). Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper extremity function and activities of daily living in hemiplegic patients: A single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Technology and Health Care, 26(4), 659–666. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-181336
18.
LencioniT.ForniaL.BowmanT.MarzeganA.CaronniA.TurollaA.JonsdottirJ.CarpinellaI.FerrarinM. (2021). A randomized controlled trial on the effects induced by robot-assisted and usual-care rehabilitation on upper limb muscle synergies in post-stroke subjects. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 5323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84536-8
19.
MaciejaszP.EschweilerJ.Gerlach-HahnK.Jansen-TroyA.LeonhardtS. (2014). A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-3
20.
MasieroS.CeliaA.RosatiG.ArmaniM. (2007). Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032
21.
MehrholzJ.PlatzT.KuglerJ.PohlM. (2009). Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke, 40(5), e392–e393. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.108.536219
22.
PinheiroC.FigueiredoJ.CerqueiraJ.SantosC. P. (2022). Robotic biofeedback for post-stroke gait rehabilitation: A scoping review. Sensors, 22(19), 7197. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197197
23.
PinterD.PegritzS.PargfriederC.ReiterG.WurmW.GattringerT.Linderl-MadrutterR.NeuperC.FazekasF.GrieshoferP.EnzingerC.EnzingerC. (2013). Exploratory study on the effects of a robotic hand rehabilitation device on changes in grip strength and brain activity after stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 20(4), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2004-308
24.
RanzaniR.LambercyO.MetzgerJ. C.CaliffiA.RegazziS.DinacciD.PetrilloC.RossiP.ContiF. M.GassertR.GassertR. (2020). Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: A randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 17, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7
25.
SanfordJ.MorelandJ.SwansonL. R.StratfordP. W.GowlandC. (1993). Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Physical Therapy, 73(7), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/73.7.447
26.
SchweighoferN.WangC.MottetD.LaffontI.BakhtiK.ReinkensmeyerD. J.Rémy-NérisO. (2018). Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 15, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0428-1
27.
VeerbeekJ. M.Langbroek-AmersfoortA. C.Van WegenE. E.MeskersC. G.KwakkelG. (2017). Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316666957
28.
VeerbeekJ. M.van WegenE.van PeppenR.Van der WeesP. J.HendriksE.RietbergM.KwakkelG. (2014). What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 9(2), Article e87987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087987
29.
WangC.PengL.HouZ. G. (2022). A control framework for adaptation of training task and robotic assistance for promoting motor learning with an upper limb rehabilitation robot. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(12), 7737–7747. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2022.3163916
30.
WangW. C.YehC. Y.HuangJ. J.ChangS. C.PeiY. C. (2023). Synergic effect of robot-assisted rehabilitation and antispasticity therapy: A narrative review. Life, 13(2), 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020252
31.
YingnanL.LiQ.QingmingQ.LiD.ZhenC.HuangF.JieJ. (2022). Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted training versus enhanced upper extremity therapy on upper and lower extremity for stroke survivors: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 54, 882.
32.
Zengin-MetliD.Özbudak-DemirS.Eraktaşİ.Binay-SaferV.EkizT. (2018). Effects of robot assistive upper extremity rehabilitation on motor and cognitive recovery, the quality of life, and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 31(6), 1059–1064. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-171015
33.
ZhangL.JiaG.MaJ.WangS.ChengL. (2022a). Short and long-term effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb motor function and activity of daily living in patients post-stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01058-8
34.
ZhangL.JiaG.MaJ.WangS.ChengL. (2022b). Short and long-term effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb motor function and activity of daily living in patients post-stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01058-8
35.
ZhangM.DaviesT. C.XieS. (2013). Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation–a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 10, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-30
36.
ZhaoM.WangG.WangA.ChengL. J.LauY. (2022). Robot-assisted distal training improves upper limb dexterity and function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-regression. Neurological Sciences, 43(3), 1641–1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05913-3
37.
ZhuY.WangC.LiJ.ZengL.ZhangP. (2023). Effect of different modalities of artificial intelligence rehabilitation techniques on patients with upper limb dysfunction after stroke—a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Neurology, 14, Article 1125172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1125172
