In this study, we investigated psychometric support for a version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport (MATS) that would be suitable for Brazilian athletes. Four translators participated in the back-translation of this instrument from English to Portuguese, two specialists synthesized the Portuguese and English back-translation versions, and 10 experts assessed the questionnaire items and judged their content validity. To evaluate structural validity, we performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We evaluated internal item reliability with a sample of 447 athletes who completed the adapted measure (the MATS-B). Finally, 202 other athletes completed both the MATS-B and a second measure of collective efficacy (CEQS-B) to provide external validity correlates. With these data, the MATS-B now provides valid and reliable data supporting its use with Brazilian athletes in an adapted assessment tool that aligns with the conceptual framework of teamwork in sports.
AmaralC. M.BastosF. D. C. (2018). Transcultural adaptation of the sports facilities management questionnaire of peiro, martinez-tur and tordera. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 31(2), 457. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-5509201700020457
2.
American Educational Research Association. (2014). American psychological association, and national council on measurement in education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
3.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
4.
CarronA. V.MartinL. J.LougheadT. M. (2012). Teamwork and performance. In MurphyS. N. (Ed), The Oxford handbook of sport performance psychology (pp. 309–327). Oxford University Press.
5.
Cassep-BorgesV.BalbinottiM. A. A.TeodoroM. L. M. (2010). Tradução e validação de conteúdo: Uma proposta para a adaptação de instrumentos. In PasqualiL. (Ed), Instrumentação psicológica: Fundamentos e prática (pp. 506–520). Artmed Editora.
6.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
9.
ForsythD. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
10.
FransenK.McEwanD.SarkarM. (2020). The impact of identity leadership on team functioning and well-being in team sport: Is psychological safety the missing link?Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 51(101763), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101763
HairJ.AndersonR.TathamR.BlackW. (2005). Análise muktivariada de Dados. Prentice Hall.
13.
Hernández-NietoR. A. (2002). Contribuciones al análisis estadístico [Contributions to statistical analysis]. Universidad de Los Andes/IESINFO.
14.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific software international. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15.
JorgeM. R. (1998). Adaptação transcultural de instrumentos de pesquisa em saúde mental. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 25(5), 233–239.
McEwanD. (2020). The effects of perceived teamwork on emergent states and satisfaction with performance among team sport athletes. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000166
18.
McEwanD.BeauchampM. R. (2014). Teamwork in sport: A theoretical and integrative review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7(1), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2014.932423
19.
McEwanD.BeauchampM. R. (2020). Teamwork training in sport: A pilot intervention study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 32(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2018.1518277
20.
McEwanD.ZumboB. D.EysM. A.BeauchampM. R. (2018). The development and psychometric properties of the multidimensional assessment of teamwork in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 40(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2017-0193
21.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
22.
MitraA.LanforkdS. (1999). Research methods in park, recreation and leisure services. Sagamore Publishing.
23.
NascimentoE.FigueiredoV. L. (2002). WISC-III e WAIS-III: Alterações nas versões originais americanas decorrentes das adaptações para uso no brasil. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 15(3), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722002000300014
24.
NunnallyJ. C. B.IraH. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
25.
PaesM. J.TaconeliC. A.ForbelloneA. A.FernandesG. J.FeltzD. L.StefanelloJ. M. F. (2021). A cross-cultural adaptation of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports (CEQS): Validity evidence for a Brazilian version. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(5), 2304–2325. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211029907
26.
PierceS.GouldD.CamiréM. (2017). Definition and model of life skills transfer. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 186–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2016.1199727
27.
RebustiniF.BalbinottiM. A. A.Ferretti-RebustiniR. E. d. L.MachadoA. A. (2016). Psicometria esportiva, caracterização dos participantes E invariância: Uma revisão crítica. Journal of Physical Education, 27(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v27i1.2760
28.
RevelleW.ZinbargR. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
RousseauV.AubéC.SavoieA. (2006). Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37(5), 540–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406293125
31.
ShortS. E.SullivanP.FeltzD. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9(3), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0903_3
32.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
33.
WeirJ. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1
