This research adapted the Group Conflict Questionnaire (GCQ) into Portuguese and provided evidence for its construct validity. Study 1 included four translators and five academics who developed a Portuguese version of the GCQ (P-GCQ). In this phase, we provided evidence for content and construct validity for the scale and for each item using an expert panel in a pilot study with 20 youth athletes. Study 2 included two participant samples (Sample 1, n =254; Sample 2, n =351) of Brazilian youth and adult athletes who completed the adapted P-GCQ, providing evidence for the structural aspect of its construct validity via factor analyses. Study 3 included 162 Brazilian athletes who completed the P-GCQ and a measure of team cohesion, from which we provided further evidence of the P-GCQ’s internal and external construct validity, showing that both task and social cohesion were negatively associated with the athletes’ perceptions of group conflict. Overall, we found that the P-GCQ produces valid and reliable scores for Portuguese-speaking athletes; it may now be used confidently by researchers and practitioners interested in assessing group conflict within this population.
AlcaláD. H.GarijoA. H. (2017).
Teaching games for understanding: A comprehensive approach to promote student’s motivation in physical education. Journal of Human Kinetics,
59(1), 17–27. doi:10.1515/hukin-2017-0144
2.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015).
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software,
67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
3.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing The Construct of Interpersonal Conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), 216–244. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022913
4.
BollenK. A.StineR. A. (1993). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit criteria in structural equation modelling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 111–135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
BrownT. A. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research.
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
6.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R.WidmeyerW. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In DudaJ. L. (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226).
Morgantown, WV:
Fitness Information Technology.
7.
CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R. (1985).
The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport. Psychology,
7, 244–266.
8.
ChowG. M.FeltzD. L. (2007). Exploring new directions in collective efficacy and sport. In BeauchampM. R.EysM. A. (Eds.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology (pp. 221–248).
New York, NY:
Routledge.
9.
ChuT. L.ZhangT. (2019).
The roles of coaches, peers, and parents in athletes’ basic psychological needs: A mixed-studies review. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching,
14(1), 569–588. doi:10.1177/1747954119858458
10.
ClancyR. B.HerringM. P.MacIntyreT. E.CampbellM. J. (2016).
A review of competitive sport motivation research. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
27, 232–242. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.09.003
11.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
DeVellisR. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol.
26).
London, England:
Sage.
13.
EysM. A.BrawleyL. R. (2018).
Reflections on cohesion research with sport and exercise groups. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,
12, e12379. doi:10.1111/spc3.12379
14.
FolleA.do NascimentoJ. V.SallesW. N.MacielL. F. P.DallegraveE. J. (2018).
Envolvimento dos familiares no processo de formação esportiva no basquetebol feminino [Family involvement in the sports training process in basketball female]. Journal of Physical Education,
29(1), 2914.
15.
FransenK.DecroosS.BroekG. V.BoenF. (2016).
Leading from the top or leading from within? A comparison between coaches’ and athletes’ leadership as predictors of team identification, team confidence, and team cohesion. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching,
11(6), 757–771. doi:10.1177/1747954116676102
16.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models.
Cambridge, MA:
Cambridge University Press.
17.
Gunnell, K. E., Schellenberg, B. J., Wilson, P. M., Crocker, P. R., Mack, D. E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2014). A review of validity evidence presented in the Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology (2002 -2012): Misconceptions and recommendations for validation research. In B. D. Zumbo. & E. K. Chan. (Eds.), Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences Social indicators research series (Vol. 54, pp. 137–156). Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07794-9_8
18.
HairJ. F.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR.TathamR. (2014). Análise multivariada de dados [Multivariate data analysis].
São Paulo, Brazil:
Bookman.
19.
HairJ.RisherJ.SarstedtM.RingleC. (2019).
When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review,
31(1), 2–24.
20.
HarwoodC. G.KnightC. J.ThrowerS. N.BerrowS. R. (2019).
Advancing the study of parental involvement to optimise the psychosocial development and experiences of young athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
42, 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.01.007
21.
HaynesS. N.RichardD.KubanyE. S. (1995).
Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods.Psychological Assessment,
7(3), 238.
22.
Hernández-NietoR. A. (2002). Contributions to statistical analysis.
Mérida, Mexico:
Universidad de Los Andes.
23.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999).
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,
6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
JowettS. (2017).
Coaching effectiveness: The coach-athlete relationship at its heart.Current Opinion in Psychology,
16, 154–158. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006
25.
KimH.CruzA. B. (2016).
The influence of coaches’ leadership styles on athletes’ satisfaction and team cohesion: A meta-analytic approach. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching,
11(6), 900–909. doi:10.1177/1747954116676117
26.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Vol. 3rd). New York: Guilford publications.
27.
KlineR. B. (2012). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.
New York, NY:
The Guilford Press.
28.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996).
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.Psychological Methods,
1, 130–149.
29.
MarôcoJ.(2010). Análise de Equações Estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, Software e Aplicações [Analysis of structural equations: Theoretical foundations, software and application].
Pêro Pinheiro, Portugal:
Report Number.
30.
MessickS. (1995).
Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning.American Psychologist,
50(9), 741.
31.
MonteiroD.MoutãoJ. M.CidL. (2018).
Validation of the behavioural regulation in sport questionnaire in Portuguese athletes. Revista de psicología del deporte,
27(1), 145–150.
32.
MossmanG. J.CroninL. D. (2019).
Life skills development and enjoyment in youth soccer: The importance of parental behaviours.Journal of Sports Sciences,
37(8), 850–856. doi:10.1080/02640414.2018.1530580
33.
Nascimento JuniorJ. R. A.GranjaC. T. L.FortesL. D. S.FreireG. L. M.OliveiraD. V.PeixotoE. M. (2018).
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire (P-YSEQ).Journal of Physical Education and Sport,
18(3), 1606–1614. doi:10.7752/jpes.2018.03236
34.
NevesM. H. M. (2010).
O acordo ortográfico da língua portuguesa e a meta de simplificação e unificação. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada [The orthographic agreement of the Portuguese language and the goal of simplification and unification],
26(1), 87–113. doi:10.1590/S0102-44502010000100004
35.
NunnallyJ. C.BersteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory.
New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill.
36.
ParadisK.CarronA.MartinL. (2014).
Development and validation of an inventory to assess conflict in sport teams: The Group Conflict Questionnaire.Journal of Sports Sciences,
32(20), 1966–1978. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.970220
37.
PasqualiL. (2010). Instrumentação psicológica-fundamentos e práticas [Psychological instrumentation-foundations and practices] (Artmed). Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed.
38.
ReisC. P.FerreiraM. C. C.MoraesL. C. C. A. (2016).
O apoio dos pais ao desenvolvimento da carreira de atletas masculinos de basquetebol [Parental support for the career development of male basketball athletes].Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte,
38(2), 149–155.
39.
RigoniP. A.Nascimento JuniorJ. R. A.BelemI. C.VieiraL. F.MacDonaldD. J. (2018).
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the youth experience survey for sport (P-YES-S). Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,
22(4), 310–321. doi:10.1080/1091367X.2018.1446961
SullivanP. J.FeltzD. L. (2001).
The relationship between intrateam conflict and cohesion within hockey teams. Small Group Research,
32, 342–355.
42.
TenenbaumG.EklundR. C.KamataA. (2012). Introduction to measurement in sport and exercise psychology. In TenenbaumG.EklundR.KamataA. (Eds.), Measurement in sport and exercise psychology (pp. 3–7).
Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics.
43.
TorresA. R. R.CaminoL. (2011). Psicologia social: temas e teorias [Social psychology: Themes and theories] (Cap. 9, pp. 515–539). Brasília, Brazil: Technopolitik.
44.
VilaniL. H. P.SamulskiD. M. (2002). Família e esporte: uma revisão sobre a influência dos pais na carreira esportiva de crianças e adolescents [Family and sport: a review of the influence of parents on the sports career of children and adolescents]. In GarciaS.LemosK. L. M. (Orgs.), Temas atuais VII: educação física e esportes (pp. 9–26).
Belo Horizonte, Brazil:
Editora Health.
45.
WachsmuthS.JowettS.HarwoodC. G. (2016).
Conflict among athletes and their coaches: What is the theory and research so far?International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology,
10(1), 84–107. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2016.1184698
