While the ability to coordinate movements temporally with rhythmic auditory stimuli is universal, previous investigators showed that accurate rhythm reproduction depends on temporal complexity. To date, the effect of multiple pitches on the timing of rhythmic movements has been assumed. Exploring a possible sustained entrainment effect of auditory stimuli on sequential movement might further elucidate the role of temporal complexity and its interaction with multiple pitch engagement. Thus, we investigated the sustained effect of auditory entrainment and the interaction between temporal complexity and pitch on predefined sequential tapping with tapping sequences predefined before a synchronization-timekeeping task. Temporal complexity was manipulated by increasing the number of non-integer ratios in temporal rhythm. The rhythm sequences were presented with either multiple pitches or a single pitch. We found a reduction in mean asynchronies and ratio error in three rhythms with non-integer ratios, while inter-response interval error was reduced in the integer rhythm and the rhythm with one repetitive integer ratio and one non-integer ratio. Ratio error remanence was less in rhythms with two non-integer ratios. We found no significant difference between the two pitch types. There was a sustained entrainment effect of sequential tapping that varied with differing temporal complexity, and pitch information was not essential for auditory entrainment. These findings provide support for possible interventions aimed at motor learning.
AmmiranteP.ThompsonW. F. (2010). Melodic accent as an emergent property of tonal motion. Empirical Musicology Review, 5(3), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/47559
2.
AmmiranteP.ThompsonW. F.RussoF. A. (2011). Ideomotor effects of pitch on continuation tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.495408
3.
AndermannM.GüntherM.PattersonR. D.RuppA. (2021). Early cortical processing of pitch height and the role of adaptation and musicality. NeuroImage, 225(2020), 117501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117501
4.
ANSI. (1994). Terminology American national standard acoustical (acoustical society of America).
5.
AscherslebenG. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain and Cognition, 48(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2001.1304
6.
BavassiM. L.TagliazucchiE.LajeR. (2013). Small perturbations in a finger-tapping task reveal inherent nonlinearities of the underlying error correction mechanism. Human Movement Science, 32(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.06.002
7.
BigliassiM.KarageorghisC. I.BishopD. T.NowickyA. V.WrightM. J. (2018). Cerebral effects of music during isometric exercise: An fMRI study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 133(July), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.475
8.
BoodR. J.NijssenM.van der KampJ.RoerdinkM. (2013). The power of auditory-motor synchronization in sports: Enhancing running performance by coupling cadence with the right beats. PLoS ONE, 8(8), Article e70758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070758
9.
Braun JanzenT.SchaffertN.SchlüterS.PloigtR.ThautM. H. (2021). The effect of perceptual-motor continuity compatibility on the temporal control of continuous and discontinuous self-paced rhythmic movements. Human Movement Science, 76(January), 102761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102761
ChaY.KimY.HwangS.ChungY. (2014). Intensive gait training with rhythmic auditory stimulation in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke: A pilot randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation, 35(4), 681–688. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-141182
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CollierG. L.WrightC. E. (1995). Temporal rescaling of sample and complex rations in rhythmic tapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 602–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.602
15.
DioneM.Delevoye-TurrellY. (2015). Testing the co-existence of two timing strategies for motor control in a unique task: The synchronisation spatial-tapping task. Human Movement Science, 43, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.06.009
16.
DrakeC. (1993). Reproduction of musical rhythms by children, adult musicians, and adult nonmusicians. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211712
17.
DumasG.LarocheJ.LehmannA. (2014). Your body, my body, our coupling moves our bodies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1004. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01004
EssensP. J. (1986). Hierarchical organization of temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208185
20.
EssensP. J.PovelD. J. (1985). Metrical and nonmetrical representations of temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 37(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207132
21.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FinneyS. A. (1997). Auditory feedback and musical keyboard performance. Music Perception, 15(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285747
24.
FreydJ. J.KellyM. H.DeKayM. L. (1990). Representational momentum in memory for pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), 1107–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1107
25.
GhasemiA.ZahediaslS. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
26.
GrahnJ. A. (2012). Neural mechanisms of rhythm perception: Current findings and future perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01213.x
27.
GrahnJ. A.BrettM. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.893
28.
GrahnJ. A.SchuitD. (2012). Individual differences in rhythmic ability: Behavioral and neuroimaging investigations. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 22(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031188
29.
GrahnJ. A.WatsonS. L. (2013). Perspectives on rhythm processing in motor regions of the brain. Music Therapy Perspectives, 31(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/31.1.25
30.
GrubeM.CooperF. E.ChinneryP. F.GriffithsT. D. (2010). Dissociation of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing in cerebellar degeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(25), 11597–11601. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910473107
31.
IannarilliF.VannozziG.IosaM.PesceC.CapranicaL. (2013). Effects of task complexity on rhythmic reproduction performance in adults. Human Movement Science, 32(1), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.12.004
32.
IBM SPSS Statistics. (2022). IBM SPSS statistics 28 command syntax reference. IBM Corp.
33.
KellerP. E.ReppB. H. (2005). Staying offbeat: Sensorimotor syncopation with structured and unstructured auditory sequences. Psychological Research, 69(4), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0182-9
34.
KeppelG. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Prentice-Hall.
35.
KlassenT. D.SimpsonL. A.LimS. B.LouieD. R.ParappillyB.SakakibaraB. M.ZbogarD.EngJ. J. (2016). Stepping up activity poststroke: Ankle-positioned accelerometer can accurately record steps during slow walking. Physical Therapy, 96(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140611
36.
LewisP. A.WingA. M.PopeP. A.PraamstraP.MiallR. C. (2004). Brain activity correlates differentially with increasing temporal complexity of rhythms during initialisation, synchronisation, and continuation phases of paced finger tapping. Neuropsychologia, 42(10), 1301–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.001
37.
MatesJ.RadilT.PoppelE. (1992). Cooperative tapping: Time control under different feedback condition. Perception and Psychophysics, 52(6), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211706
NozaradanS.PeretzI.KellerP. E. (2016). Individual differences in rhythmic cortical entrainment correlate with predictive behavior in sensorimotor synchronization. Scientific Reports, 6, 20612. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20612
40.
PalvaS.PalvaJ. M. (2018). Roles of brain criticality and multiscale oscillations in temporal predictions for sensorimotor processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 41(10), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.08.008
41.
PattersonR. D.GaudrainE.WaltersT. C. (2010). The perception of family and register in musical tones. In Riess JonesM.FayR.PopperA. (Eds.), Music perception. Springer handbook of auditory research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6114-3_2
42.
Phillips-SilverJ.AktipisC. A.BryantG. A. (2010). The ecology of entrainment: Foundations of coordinated rhythmic movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2010.28.1.3
43.
PovelD. J. (1981). Internal representation of simple temporal patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.7.1.3
44.
ReppB. H. (2002). Phase correction following a perturbation in sensorimotor synchronization depends on sensory information. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890209601947
45.
ReppB. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 969–992. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206433
46.
ReppB. H. (2011). Temporal evolution of the phase correction response in synchronization of taps with perturbed two-interval rhythms. Experimental Brain Research, 208(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2462-5
47.
ReppB. H.LondonJ.KellerP. E. (2005). Production and synchronization of uneven rhythms at fast tempi. Music Perception, 23(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2005.23.1.61
48.
ReppB. H.LondonJ.KellerP. E. (2013). Systematic distortions in musicians’ reproduction of cyclic three-interval rhythms. Music Perception, 30(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.30.3.291
49.
ReppB. H.Luke WindsorW.DesainP. (2002). Effects of tempo on the timing of simple musical rhythms. Music Perception, 19(4), 565–593. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2002.19.4.565
50.
ReppB. H.SuY.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403–452. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2
51.
RossoM.LemanM.MoumdjianL. (2021). Neural entrainment meets behavior: The stability index as a neural outcome measure of auditory-motor coupling. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15(June), 668918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.668918
SakaiK.HikosakaO.MiyauchiS.TakinoR.TamadaT.IwataN. K.NielsenM. (1999). Neural representation of a rhythm depends on its in interval ratio. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(22), 10074–10081. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-22-10074.1999
SemjenA.SchulzeH. H.VorbergD. (2000). Timing precision in continuation and synchronization tapping. Psychological Research, 63(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008172
56.
SlaterJ.AshleyR.TierneyA.KrausN. (2017). Got rhythm? Better inhibitory control is linked with more consistent drumming and enhanced neural tracking of the musical beat in adult percussionists and nonpercussionists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01189
TekiS.GrubeM.GriffithsT. D. (2011a). A unified model of time perception accounts for duration-based and beat-based timing mechanisms. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 5(December), 90. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2011.00090
60.
TekiS.GrubeM.KumarS.GriffithsT. D. (2011b). Distinct neural substrates of duration-based and beat-based auditory timing. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(10), 3805–3812. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5561-10.2011
61.
TerryP. C.KarageorghisC. I.CurranM. L.MartinO. V.Parsons-SmithR. L. (2020). Effects of music in exercise and sport: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000216
62.
ThautM. H.LeinsA. K.RiceR. R.ArgstatterH.KenyonG. P.McIntoshG. C.BolayH. V.FetterM. (2007). Rhythmic auditory stimulation improves gait more than NDT/bobath training in near-ambulatory patients early poststroke: A single-blind, randomized trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21(5), 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307300523
TrappS.HavlicekO.SchirmerA.KellerP. E. (2018). When the rhythm disappears and the mind keeps dancing: Sustained effects of attentional entrainment. Psychological Research, 84(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0983-x
65.
TrehubS. E.HannonE. E. (2009). Conventional rhythms enhance infants’ and adults’ perception of musical patterns. Cortex, 45(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.012
Van DyckE.MoensB.BuhmannJ.DemeyM.CoorevitsE.Dalla BellaS.LemanM. (2015). Spontaneous entrainment of running cadence to music tempo. Sports Medicine - Open, 1(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-015-0025-9
68.
WallentinM.NielsenA. H.Friis-OlivariusM.VuustC.VuustP. (2010). The Musical Ear Test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.004
YeeW.HolleranS.JonesM. R. (1994). Sensitivity to event timing in regular and irregular sequences: Influences of musical skill. Perception & Psychophysics, 56(4), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206737
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
