Our purpose with this study was to analyze construct validity evidence for the Motor Coordination Test with Ball (MCTB). Our participant sample included 1620 students (741 girls; 879 boys) aged between 10-12 years. Evidence for construct-validity of the four tasks using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and adequacy indices confirmed a good fit of a final two-dimensional model (BTS = .000; KMO = .83; loading .53 to .91; communalities ranging from .31 to .86; explained variance of 63.5%; goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = .99; adjusted GFI (AGFI) = .97; RMSR = .03), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (X2/df = 4.9; GFI = .97; comparative fit index (CFI) = .92; TLI = .90; Root-Mean-Square Error of Aproximation (RMSEA) = .03). We concluded that, in a Brazilian sample, the MCTB has good construct validity for motor coordination tests with balls; this helps qualify this test for use in schools and in the sports context.
AndradeF. S. S. D.DavidsonJ.SantosA. M. N. (2020). Comparative analysis of gross motor coordination between overweight/obese and eutrophic children. Fisioterapia Em Movimento, 33(e003313), 2020. http://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.033.AO13.
2.
BalbinottiM. A. ABenettiC.TerraP. R. S. (2006). Translation and validation o the Graham-Harvey survey for the Brazilian context. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 3(1), 26–48. http://doi.org/10.1108/17439130710721644.
3.
BarretP. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. [S.l: s.n.].
4.
BiddleS. J.MarklandD.GilbourneD.CharzisarantisN. L.SparkesA. C. (2001). Research methods in sport and exercise psychology: Quantitative and qualitative issues. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(10), 777–809. http://doi.org/10.1080/026404101317015438.
5.
BlankR. (2012). European academy for childhood disability (EACD): Recommendations on the definition, diagnosis and intervention of developmental coordination disorder (pocket version). Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 54(11), e1–e7. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04175.x.
6.
BruininksR. H.BruininksB. D. (2005). Bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency (2nd ed.). Pearson Assessments.
7.
CaçolaP.IbanaM.RicardM.GabbardC. (2016). Children with developmental coordination disorder demonstrate a spatial mismatch when estimating coincident-timing ability with tools. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 48, 124–131. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.021.
8.
D’HondtE.DeforcheB.GentierI.VerstuyfJ.VaeyensR.De BourdeaudhuijI.PhilippaertsR.LenoirM. (2014). A longitudinal study of gross motor coordination and weight status in children. Obesity, 22(6), 1505–1511. http://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20723.
9.
EllinoudisT.EvaggelinouC.KourtessisT.KonstantinidouZ.VEnetsanouF.KambasA. (2011). Reliability and validity of age band 1 of the movement assessment battery for children-Second Edition. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 1046-1051. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.035.
10.
FarrokhiA.Zareh ZadehM.Karimi AlvarL.KazemnejadA.IlbeigiS. (2014). Reliability and validity of test of gross motor development-2, among 3-10 aged children of Tehran city. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Management, 5(2), 18–28. http://doi.org/10.5897/JPESM12.003.
11.
HendersonS. E.SugdenD. A.BarnettA. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children (2nd ed., p. 2). Pearson.
12.
Hernández-NietoR. (2002). Contributions to statistical analysis: The coefficients of proportional variance, content validity and kappa. Universidad de Los Andes.
13.
HerrmannC.GerlachE.SeeligH. (2015). Development and validation of a test instrument for the assessment of basic motor competencies in primary school. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(2), 80–90. http://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2014.998821.
14.
HerrmannC.SeeligH. (2016). Structure and profiles of basic motor competencies in the third grade—validation of the test instrument MOBAK-3. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516679060.
15.
HerrmannC.SeeligH. (2017). Construct validity of the MOBAK-5 test instrument and determinants of basic motor competencies of fifth graders. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 48(1). in print.
16.
HuaJ.GuG.MengW.WuZ. (2013). Age band 1 of the movement assessment Battery for children-second edition: Exploring its usefulness in mainland China. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 801–808. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.012.
17.
KimS.KimM. J.ValentiniN. C.ClarkJ. E. (2014). Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 for South Korean children. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(5), 351–356. http://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2014.914886.
18.
KiphardE. J.SchillingF. (1974). Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder [Body Coordination Test]. Beltz Test.
19.
KrögerC.RothK. (2002). Escola da bola: Um ABC para iniciantes nos jogos esportivos (1st ed.). Editora Phorte.
20.
LuzL. G. O.NetoG. A. M.LuzT. D. D'A.SantosD. H. B.SilvaL. C. B.Cunha JúniorA. T.Coelho-e-SilvaM. J. (2019). Motor coordination as predictor of physical fitness in prepubertal boys. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, 21(e56205), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2019v21e56205.
21.
LuzL. G. O.Teixeira e SeabraA. F.SantosR.PadezC.FerreiraJ. P.Coelho-e-SilvaM. J. (2015). Asociação entre IMC e teste de coordenação corporal para crianças (KTK). Uma meta-análise. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 21(3), 230–235. http://doi.org/10.1590/1517-869220152103144469.
MarôcoJ. (2014). Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics.(6. ed). REPORTNUMBER Lda.
24.
MontoroA. P. P. N.CapistranoR.FerrariE. P.ReisM. S.CardosoF. L.BeltrameT. S. (2016). Concurrent validation of the MABC-2 and developmental coordination disorder questionnaire-BR. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 26(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.110421.
25.
MoreiraJ. P. A.LopesM. C.Miranda-JúniorM. V.ValentiniN. C.LageG. M.AlbuquerqueM. R. (2019). Körperkoordinationstest für kinder (KTK) for Brazilian children and adolescents: factor Analysis, invariance and factor score. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2524. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02524.
26.
MoreiraR. S.MagalhãesL. C.DouradoJ. S.LemosS. M. A.AlvesC. R. L. (2014). Factors influencing the motor development of prematurely born school-aged children in Brazil. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(9), 1941–1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.023.
27.
NobreF. S. S.CoutinhoM. T. C.ValentiniN. C. (2014). The ecology of motor development in coastal school children of Brazil Northeast. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 24(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhdg.88910.
28.
PasqualiL. (2010). Histórico dos instrumentos psicológicos (pp. 11–47). Instrumentação psicológica.
29.
PatelP.GabbardC. (2017). Adaptation and preliminary testing of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire (DCDQ) for children in India. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 37(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2016.1150383.
30.
PereiraS.ReyesA.Moura-Dos-SantosM.SantosC.GomesT. N.TaniG.VasconcelosO.BarreiraT. V.KarzmarzykP. T.MaiaJ. (2020). Why are children different in their moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels? A multilevel analysis. Jornal de Pediatria, 96(2), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2018.10.013.
31.
ReisC. P.MoralesJ. C. P.GomesC. M. A.PereiraF. de A. A.IbáñezS. J. (2021). Construct validation of a new instrument to measure declarative tactical knowledge in basketball. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(4), 1712–1729. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211016247.
32.
RibasS.AburachidL. M. C.MoralesJ. C. P.MonteiroG. N.PraçaG. M.CastroH. O.GrecoP. J. (2020). Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano, 22(2), Article e72736. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e72376.
33.
Rosa NetoF.SantosA. P. M.XavierR. F. C.AmaroK. N. (2010). A Importânciancia da avaliação motora em escolares: Análise da confiabilidade da escala de desenvolvimento motor. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, 12(6), 422–427. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2010v12n6p422.
34.
SantosV. A. P.ContreiraA. R.CaruzzoN. M.PassosP. C. B.VieiraJ. L. L. (2015). Desordem coordenativa desenvolvimental: Uma análise do estado nutricional e nível socioeconómico. Motricidade, 11(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.3195.
35.
SantosJ. O.LDos SantosR. C.Fernandes FerreiraL.CardosoF. L. (2016). Indicadores antropométricos e desempenho motor de escolares manauaras (AM–Brasil). Journal of Physical Education, 27(1), 2733. http://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v27i1.2733.
36.
SantosL. R. V.FerracioliM. C. (2020). Prevalência de crianças identificadas com dificuldades motoras. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 28(2), 525–538.https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1847.
37.
SantosJ. J. O. L.FormigaN. S.MeloG. F.RamalhoM. H. S.CardosoF. L. (2017). Factorial structure validation of the movement assessment Battery for children in school-age children Between 8 and 10 Years old. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 27(68), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272768201713.
38.
SantosA. M.NetoF. R.PimentaR. A. (2013). Avaliação das habilidades motoras de crianças participantes de projetos sociais/esportivos. Motricidade, 9(22), 502667–502760. https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.9.
39.
SantosV. A. P.VieiraJ. L. L. (2013). Prevalência de desordem coordenativa desenvolvimental em crianças com 7 a 10 anos de idade. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, 15(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2013v15n2p233.
40.
SilvaS. A. (2010). Bateria de testes para Medir a coordenação com bola de crianças E jovens. Doutorado (tese ciências do movimento). (pp. 1–154). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
41.
SilvaJ.BeltrameT. S. (2013). Indicativo de transtorno do desenvolvimento da coordenação de escolares com idade entre 7 e 10 anos. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte, 35(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-32892013000100002.
42.
Smits-EngelsmanB. C. M.NiemeijerA. S.Van WaelveldeH. (2011). Is the movement assessment battery for children-2nd edition a reliable instrument to measure motor performance in 3 year old children?Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 1370–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.031.
43.
UlrichD. A. (2016). Test of gross motor development (3rd ed.). PRO-ED.
44.
ValentiniN. C.BarbosaM. L. L.CiniG. V.PickR. K.SpessatoB. C.BalbinottiM. A. A. (2008). Teste de desenvolvimento motor grosso: Validade e consistência interna para uma população Gaúcha. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, 10(4), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2008v10n4p399.
45.
ValentiniN. C.RamalhoM. H.OliveiraM. A. (2014). Movement assessment battery for children-2: Translation, reliability, and validity for Brazilian children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(3), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.028.
46.
VandorpeB.VandendriesscheJ.LefevreJ.PionJ.VaeyensR.MatthysS.PhilippaertsR.LenoirM. (2011). The KorperkoordinationsTest fur Kinder: reference values and suitability for 6-12-year-old children in Flanders. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21(3), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01067.x.
47.
WagnerM. O.KastnerJ.PetermannF.BosK. (2011). Factorial validity of the movement assessment battery for children-2 (age band 2). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 674–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.016.
48.
WarwitzS. A. (1982). Normentafeln zum “wiener Koordinationsparcours” (WKP). Sportunterricht, 31(4), 59–64.
49.
WongK. Y. A.CheungS. Y. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the test of gross motor development-2. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 14(3), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913671003726968.
50.
YunJ.UlrichD. A. (2002). Estimating measurement validity: A tutorial. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.19.1.32.
