“I Can Help Them Become Better Teachers,But I Can’t Help Them With Educative Teacher Performance Assessment”: Cooperating Teachers’ Knowledge and Experience of the Educative Teacher Performance Assessment in Physical and Health Education

Abstract

Utilizing a thematic analysis approach, this case study investigated cooperating teachers’ (CTs) knowledge and experience of the educative Teacher Performance Assessment (edTPA) in physical and health education. Participants were 14 certified physical education (PE) and/or health education CTs from a single school district in Alabama. Data were collected through one-on-one interviews; Nvivo software was employed to store, organize, and code the data, and data analysis utilized analytic induction and constant comparison techniques. Five themes emerged regarding edTPA preparation of these participants: (a) a lack of teacher training and resources, (b) receipt of informal information from teacher candidates (TCs), (c) perceptions of providing inadequate support, (d) CT experience with obtaining parental waivers and class recordings, and (e) a perceived edTPA tradeoff of increased stress for teacher development. There was a clear need in this district to: (a) better promote edTPA training opportunities, (b) consider compulsory edTPA training for CTs who supervised TCs, (c) share edTPA training handouts and resources with CTs, and (d) ensure that university faculty clearly communicate edTPA requirements to CTs.

Keywords

edTPA cooperating teachers teacher candidates PHETE physical and health education teacher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Behney

(2016). Perceived influence of cooperating teachers on edTPA performance. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12199

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burns

B. B.

Henry

J. J.

Lindauer

J. R.

(2015). Working together to foster candidate success on the edTPA. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 6(2), 18–37.

Clayton

C. D.

(2018). Policy meets practice in New York state: Understanding early edTPA implementation through preservice candidates’ eyes. Teacher Education Quarterly, 45(3), 97–125.

Creswell

J. W.

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixes methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Davis

K. L.

Wash

P. D.

(2019). The edTPA and physical education teacher education: Working in tandem to prepare successful teachers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 90(5), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2019.1580634

edTPA . (2020, February 4). edTPA participation map. http://edtpa.aacte.org/state-policy

Goetz

J. P.

LeCompte

M. D.

(1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Academic Press.

Goldhaber

Cowan

Theobald

(2017). Evaluating prospective teachers: Testing the predictive validity of the edTPA. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702582

10.

Grant

M. A.

Sanderson

S. L.

(2016). edTPA for physical education mentor teachers: Major themes in edTPA. Georgia Association of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance Journal, 48(2), 16–22.

11.

Greenblatt

O’Hara

K. E.

(2015). Buyer beware: Lessons learned from edTPA implementation in New York State. The NEA Higher Education Journal, 42(2), 57–67.

12.

Heil

Berg

M. H.

(2017). Something happened on the way to completing the edTPA: A case study of teacher candidates’ perceptions of the edTPA. Contributions to Music Education, 42, 181–199.

13.

Hemphill

M. A.

Richards

K. A. R.

(2016). Without the academic part, it wouldn’t be squash; Youth development in an urban squash program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2015-0109

14.

Holden

S. L.

Parkes

O’Leary

(2020). Teacher candidate perceptions of the edTPA in physical and health education. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 11(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2020.1810583

15.

Kissau

Hart

L. C.

Algozzine

(2019). Investigating the impact of edTPA professional development on classroom practice and student teaching experience. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117721706

16.

Lindauer

J. R.

Burns

B. A.

Henry

J. J.

(2013). Effective scaffolding for edTPA: Perspectives from teacher candidates, cooperating teachers, and college supervisors. Excelsior: Leadership in Teacher Education, 8(1), 37–52.

17.

Lunsford

Warner

W. J.

Park

T. D.

Morgan

J. E.

(2016). Agricultural education teacher candidates’ perceptions of the edTPA. Career and Technical Education Research, 41(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.5328/cter41.3.213

18.

Margolis

Doring

(2013). National assessments for student teachers: Documenting teaching readiness to the tipping point. Action in Teacher Education, 35(4), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2013.827602

19.

Martin

E. H.

Klinkenborg

Wetherington

(2018). Highlighting edTPA academic language in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 89(7), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2018.1490221

20.

Merriam

S. B.

(1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

21.

Meuwissen

Choppin

Shang-Butler

Cloonan

(2015). Teacher candidates’ perceptions of and experiences with early implementation of the edTPA licensure examination in New York and Washington states. Warner School of Education, University of Rochester.

22.

O’Leary

(2014). Learning informally to use teaching games for understanding: The experiences of a recently qualified teacher. European Physical Education Review, 20(3), 367–384. https://doi:10.1177/1356336X14534359

23.

Olson

O’Neil

Sazama

(2019). Understanding the physical education edTPA assessment: Strategies for success. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 32(4), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2019.1607639

24.

Paine

Beal-Alvarez

Scheetz

(2016). edTPA you have to attack this like a lion hunting a gazelle on the Serengeti: Student perspectives on the implementation of a new initiative. Issues in Teacher Education, 25(2), 149–166.

25.

Patton

M. Q.

(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

26.

Sarantakos

(2005). Social research (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

27.

SCALE (2016). edTPA. https://scale.stanford.edu/teaching/edtpa. Author.

28.

Schwartz

Fischhoff

Krishnamurti

Sowell

(2013). The Hawthorne effect and energy awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unites States of America, 110(38), 15242–15246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301687110

29.

Seymour

C. A.

Burns

B. A.

Henry

J. J.

(2018). Cooperating teachers: Stakeholders in the edTPA? Issues in Teacher Education, 27(1), 41–56.

30.

Stake

R. E.

(2000). Case studies. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–453). Sage.

31.

Treadwell

S. M.

Cameron

J. L.

Manson

(2017). edTPA and physical education: Tips for success for all stakeholders. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 88(5), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1294511

32.

Williams

(2002). Generalization in interpretive research. In May

(Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 125–143). Sage.

33.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.