This study investigated the impact of mental fatigue and self-controlled versus yoked feedback on learning a force production task. We randomly assigned 44 non-athlete male students (Mage = 21.4, SD = 1.4 years) to four groups; (a) MF&SCF = mental fatigue & self-controlled feedback, (b) MF&Y = mental fatigue & yoked, (c) NMF&SCF = no mental fatigue & self-controlled feedback, and (d) NMF&Y = no mental fatigue & yoked). SCF group participants were provided feedback whenever they requested it, while YK group participants received feedback according to a schedule created by their SCF counterparts. To induce mental fatigue, participants performed a Stroop color-word task for one hour. During the acquisition (practice) phase, participants were asked to produce a given percentage of their maximum force (20%) in 12 blocks of six trials. We recorded the participants’ absolute error at the end of the acquisition phase, the immediate retention test, the first transfer test, and the second transfer test (after 24 hours and without any further mental fatigue). The acquisition phase data were analyzed in a 2 (feedback) × 2 (mental fatigue) × 12 (block) ANOVA with repeated measures on the last factor, while the retention and transfer data were analyzed in 2 (feedback) × 2 (mental fatigue) ANOVAs. We found that all four groups made significant progress during practice (p < .001), but there were no significant group differences during this phase (p>.05). There was a significant interaction effect of self-controlled feedback and mental fatigue at retention (p = .018) and transfer testing (p < .001). In the mental fatigue condition, participants in the self-controlled group had poorer learning compared to participants in the yoked group; but when not mentally fatigued, participants in the self-controlled group had better learning than those in the yoked group. These findings suggest that mental fatigue reduces typical advantages of self-controlled feedback in motor learning.
BruechertL.LaiQ.SheaC. H. (2003).
Reduced knowledge of results frequency enhances error detection. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
74(4), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609116
5.
CapuronL.WelbergL.HeimC.WagnerD.SolomonL.PapanicolaouD. A.CraddockR. C.MillerA. H.ReevesW. C. (2006).
Cognitive dysfunction relates to subjective report of mental fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology,
31(8), 1777–1784. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301005
6.
ChiviacowskyS. (2014).
Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
15(5), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003
7.
ChiviacowskyS.de MedeirosF. L.KaeferA.WallyR.WulfG. (2008).
Self-controlled feedback in 10-year-old children: Higher feedback frequencies enhance learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
79(1), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599467
8.
ChiviacowskyS.LessaH. T. (2017).
Choices over feedback enhance motor learning in older adults. Journal of Motor Learning and Development,
5(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0031
9.
ChiviacowskyS.WulfG. (2002).
Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
73(4), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040
10.
ChiviacowskyS.WulfG. (2005).
Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
76(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260
11.
ChiviacowskyS.WulfG.LewthwaiteR. (2012).
Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology,
3, 458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458
12.
Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Campos, T. (2012). Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease. Gait & Posture, 35(4), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003
13.
CoutinhoD.GonçalvesB.TravassosB.WongD. P.CouttsA. J.SampaioJ. E. (2017).
Mental fatigue and spatial references impair soccer players' physical and tactical performances. Frontiers in Psychology,
8, 1645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01645
14.
DuncanM. J.FowlerN.GeorgeO.JoyceS.HankeyJ. (2015).
Mental fatigue negatively influences manual dexterity and anticipation timing but not repeated high-intensity exercise performance in trained adults. Research in Sports Medicine (Print),
23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2014.975811
15.
EdwardsW. H. (2010). Motor learning and control: From theory to practice.
Cengage Learning.
16.
FairbrotherJ. T.LaughlinD. D.NguyenT. V. (2012).
Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. Frontiers in Psychology,
3, 323. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2012.00323
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007).
G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,
39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
18.
Friedrich, H. F., & Mandl, H. (1997). Analyse und Forderung selbstgesteuerten Lernens [Analyzing and fostering self-regulated learning]. In F. E. Weinert, & H. Mandl (Eds.), Psychologie der Erwachsenenbildung (Enzyklopadie der Psychologie: Padagogische Psychologie) (pp. 237–293). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
19.
GrahamJ. D.Martin GinisK. A.BrayS. R. (2017).
Exertion of self-control increases fatigue, reduces task self-efficacy, and impairs performance of resistance exercise. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology,
6(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000074
20.
GrandK. F.BruziA. T.DykeF. B.GodwinM. M.LeikerA. M.ThompsonA. G.BuchananT. L.MillerM. W. (2015).
Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation. Human Movement Science,
43, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.06.013
21.
GuadagnoliM. A., & LindquistK. (2007).
Challenge point framework and efficient learning of golf. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching,
2(1_suppl), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1260%2F174795407789705505
22.
GuadagnoliM. A.LeeT. D. (2004).
Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior,
36(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
23.
HabayJ.Van CutsemJ.VerschuerenJ.De BockS.ProostM.De WachterJ.TassignonB.MeeusenR.RoelandsB. (2021).
Mental fatigue and sport-specific psychomotor performance: A systematic review. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.),
51(7), 1527–1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01429-6
24.
Hafezi, S., Zare, H., Mehri, S.N., Mahmoodi, H., 2010. The multidimensional fatigue inventory validation and fatigue assessment in Iranian distance education students. In: Distance Learning and Education (ICDLE), 2010 4th International Conference on IEEE, pp. 195–198.
25.
JanelleC. M.KimJ.SingerR. N. (1995).
Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
81(2), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F003151259508100253
26.
JanuárioM.FigueiredoL.PortesL.BendaR. (2019).
Effects of self-controlled knowledge of results on learning a taekwondo serial skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
126(6), 1178–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0031512519869086
27.
JongmanL.MeijmanT.De-JongR. (1999). The working memory hypothesis of mental fatigue.
Department of Experimental and Work Psychology University of Gronigen.
28.
KaeferA.ChiviacowskyS.MeiraC. D. M.Jr.TaniG. (2014).
Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning in introverts and extroverts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
85(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.893051
29.
KelleyC. M.McLaughlinA. C. (2012).
Individual differences in the benefits of feedback for learning. Human Factors,
54(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811423919
30.
KokM.KomenA.van CapelleveenL.van der KampJ. (2020).
The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a physical education setting: An exploratory study on the shot-put. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,
25(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773
31.
LoristM. M.BoksemM. A.RidderinkhofK. R. (2005).
Impaired cognitive control and reduced cingulate activity during mental fatigue. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research,
24(2), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.018
32.
LoristM. M.KleinM.NieuwenhuisS.De JongR.MulderG.MeijmanT. F. (2000).
Mental fatigue and task control: Planning and preparation. Psychophysiology,
37(5), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3750614
33.
MagnusonJ. R.DoesburgS. M.McNeilC. J. (2021).
Development and recovery time of mental fatigue and its impact on motor function. Biological Psychology,
161, 108076.
34.
MarcoraS. M.StaianoW.ManningV. (2009).
Mental fatigue impairs physical performance in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology,
106(3), 857–864. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.91324.2008
35.
MartinK.StaianoW.MenaspàP.HennesseyT.MarcoraS.KeeganR.ThompsonK. G.MartinD.HalsonS.RattrayB. (2016).
Superior inhibitory control and resistance to mental fatigue in professional road cyclists. PLoS One,
11(7), e0159907. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159907
36.
Memmert, D. (2006). Self-controlled practice of decision-making skills. Perceptual and motor skills, 103(3), 879–882.
37.
Newell, K. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp.341–360). Boston: Martinus nijhoff.
38.
OldfieldR. C. (1971).
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia,
9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
39.
OlsonM. H. (2015). Introduction to theories of learning.
Psychology Press.
40.
RussellS.JenkinsD.RynneS.HalsonS. L.KellyV. (2019).
What is mental fatigue in elite sport? Perceptions from athletes and staff. European Journal of Sport Science,
19(10), 1367–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1618397
41.
Smith, M. R., Coutts, A. J., Merlini, M., Deprez, D., Lenoir, M., & Marcora, S. M. (2016). Mental fatigue impairs soccer-specific physical and technical performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000762
42.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor learning and control: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
43.
SmetsE.GarssenB.BonkeB. d.De HaesJ. (1995).
The multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. Journal of Psychosomatic Research,
39(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o
44.
SmithM. R.ZeuwtsL.LenoirM.HensN.De JongL. M.CouttsA. J. (2016).
Mental fatigue impairs soccer-specific decision-making skill. Journal of Sports Sciences,
34(14), 1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1156241
45.
UgrinowitschH.UgrinowitschA. A. C.BendaR. N.TertulianoI. W. (2010).
Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on the learning of a grip force control task. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
111(3), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.2466/23.25.PMS.111.6.643-652
46.
Van CutsemJ.De PauwK.VandervaerenC.MarcoraS.MeeusenR.RoelandsB. (2019).
Mental fatigue impairs visuomotor response time in badminton players and controls. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,
45, 101579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101579
47.
Van der LindenD.FreseM.MeijmanT. F. (2003).
Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: Effects on perseveration and planning. Acta Psychologica,
113(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00150-6
48.
VenessD.PattersonS. D.JeffriesO.WaldronM. (2017).
The effects of mental fatigue on cricket-relevant performance among elite players. Journal of Sports Sciences,
35(24), 2461–2467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1273540
