Communication through discussion and conversations is fundamental to human life; but when such discourse escapes the control of a teacher in the classroom, it becomes little more than chatter. This noise challenges teaching methods and the teaching stance with students. Yet, its impact on comprehension has rarely been studied. The aim of this literature review was to examine the research on the impact of classroom noise generated by chatter on students’ comprehension performance. We adopted the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalysis) guidelines to examine this literature. This review covered a 10-year period (papers written between 2009 and 2019), with nine experimental studies selected from the 2,954 papers screened. In 89% of these nine studies, there were significant comprehension differences on all tests, revealed when comprehension took place in a noisy environment due to chatter. This review indicated an essential need for a field survey to better understand the impact of chatter on comprehension. Other studies are recommended to highlight any correlation between measured chatter and student comprehension in a real classroom environment.
AstolfiA.PellereyF. (2008).
Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
123(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2816563
2.
AvsarY.GonulluM. T. (2010).
The influence of indoor acoustical parameters on student perception in classrooms. Noise Control Engineering Journal,
58(3), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.3397/1.3383098
3.
BistrupM. (2003).
Prevention of adverse effects of noise on children. Noise & Health,
19, 59–63.
4.
ConnollyD.DockrellJ. E.ShieldB. M.ConettaR.CoxT. J. (2013).
Adolescents’ perceptions of their school’s acoustic environment: The development of an evidence-based questionnaire. Noise & Health,
15(65), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.113525
5.
ConnollyD.DockrellJ.ShieldB.ConettaR.MydlarzC.CoxT. (2019).
The effects of classroom noise on the reading comprehension of adolescents. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
145(1), 372. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5087126
6.
DockrellJ. E.ShieldB. M. (2006).
Acoustical barriers in classrooms: The impact of noise on performance in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal,
32(3), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600635494
7.
ElliottE. M.BrigantiA. M. (2012).
Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect. Acta Psychologica,
140(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.009
8.
EnmarkerI.BomanE. (2004).
Noise annoyance response of middle school pupils and teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
24(4), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.09.005
9.
GustafsonS. J.PittmanA. L. (2011).
Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices. International Journal of Audiology,
50(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2010.521198
10.
JonesP. R.MooreD. R.AmitayS. (2015).
Developmental psychology, development of auditory selective attention: Why children struggle to hear in noisy environments. Developmental Psychology,
51(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038570
11.
KlatteM.LachmannT.MeisM. (2010).
Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise & Health,
12(49), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.70506
12.
KlatteM.BergströmK.LachmannT. (2013).
Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children. Frontiers in Psychology,
4, 578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00578
13.
LeiboldL. J.HitchensJ. J.BussE.NeffD. L. (2010).
Excitation-based and informational masking of a tonal signal in a four-tone masker. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
127(4), 2441–2450. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3298588
14.
LundquistP.HolmbergK.LandstromU. (2000).
Annoyance and effects on work from environmental noise at school. Noise & Health,
2(8), 39–46.
15.
MagimairajB. M.NagarajN. K.BenafieldN. J. (2018).
Children’s speech perception in noise: Evidence for dissociation from language and working memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,
61(5), 1294–1305. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0312
16.
Meinhardt-InjacB.SchlittmeierS.KlatteM.OttoA.PersikeM.ImhofM. (2015).
Auditory distraction by meaningless irrelevant speech: A developmental study. Applied Cognitive Psychology,
29(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3098
17.
OsmanH.SullivanJ. R. (2014).
Children’s auditory working memory performance in degraded listening conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,
57(4), 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0286
18.
ProdiN.VisentinC.FelettiA. (2013).
On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: Ranking of noise interference and of age influence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
133(1), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4770259
19.
ProdiN.VisentinC. (2015).
Listening efficiency during lessons under various types of noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
138(4), 2438–2448. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4932053
20.
RileyK. G.McGregorK. K. (2012).
Noise hampers children’s expressive word learning. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,
43(3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0053)
21.
ShamseerL.MoherD.ClarkeM.GhersiD.LiberatiA.PetticrewM.ShekelleP.StewartL. A., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015).
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ,
350, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
ShieldB. M.DockrellJ. E. (2008).
The effects of environmental and classroom noise on the academic attainments of primary school children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
123(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2812596
24.
ShieldB. M.DockrellJ. E. (2010). The effects of noise on children at school: A review. In GibbsB.GoodchildJ.HopkinsC.OldhamD. (Eds.), Collected papers in building acoustics: Room acoustics and environmental noise (pp. 159–182).
Multi-Science Publishing.
25.
ShieldB.ConettaR.DockrellJ.ConnollyD.CoxT.MydlarzC. (2015).
A survey of acoustic conditions and noise levels in secondary school classrooms in England. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
137(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4904528
26.
SkarlatosD.ManatakisM. (2003).
Effects of classroom noise on students and teachers in Greece. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
96(2), 539–544. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.96.2.539
27.
SörqvistP.HalinN.HyggeS. (2010).
Individual differences in susceptibility to the effects of speech on reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology,
24(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1543
28.
SullivanJ. R.OsmanH.SchaferE. C. (2015).
The effect of noise on the relationship between auditory working memory and comprehension in school-age children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,
58(3), 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0204
29.
VanPattenB.KeatingG. D.WulffS. (2020). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (3rd ed.).
Routledge.
30.
WightmanF. L.KistlerD. J.O’BryanA. (2010).
Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
128(1), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3436536
31.
YangX.JiangM.ZhaoY. (2017).
Effects of noise on English listening comprehension among Chinese college students with different learning styles. Frontiers in Psychology,
16, 1764. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01764
