Co-contraction training has demonstrated similar electromyographic (EMG) activity levels compared to conventional strength training. Since verbal instructions can increase EMG activity on target muscles during conventional exercises, the same should occur during co-contraction. In this study we analyzed whether different verbal instructions would alter the EMG activity of target muscles - biceps brachii (BB) and triceps brachii lateral head (TB) - during co-contraction training for the elbow joint. Seventeen males with experience in strength training performed a co-contraction set in two verbal instruction conditions to emphasize either elbow flexion or elbow extension. Surface electrodes were fixed over biceps brachii and triceps brachii lateral head muscles. We measured EMG mean amplitude and analyzed data with 2-way ANOVA. We found a significant interaction between muscle and verbal instruction (p = 0.002). Post hoc tests indicated that verbal instructions (p = 0.001) influenced the BB EMG activity (elbow flexion: M = 68.74, SD = 17.96%; elbow extension: M = 53.47, SD = 16.13%); and also showed difference (p = 0.006) in the EMG activity between BB and TB with verbal instruction emphasizing the elbow extension (BB: M = 53.47, SD = 16.13%; TB: M = 69.18, SD = 21.79%). There was a difference in the EMG ratio of BB/TB (p = 0.001) when focusing on elbow flexion (M = 1.09, SD = 0.30) versus elbow extension (M = 0.81, SD = 0.25). As verbal instruction modified the magnitude of muscle recruitment during co-contractions for elbow joint muscles, there is a clear mind-muscle connection of importance to this method of training. Also, of importance to trainers, verbal instructions seemed to affect individuals differentially.
CalatayudJ.VinstrupJ.JakobsenM. D.SundstrupE.BrandtM.JayK.ColadoJ. C.AndersenL. L. (2016).
Importance of mind-muscle connection during progressive resistance training. European Journal of Applied Physiology,
116(3), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-015-3305-7
2.
CountsB. R.BucknerS. L.DankelS. J.JesseeM. B.MattocksK. T.MouserJ. G.LaurentinoG. C.LoennekeJ. P. (2016).
The acute and chronic effects of “NO LOAD” resistance training. Physiology & Behavior,
164(Pt A), 345–352.
3.
CrouzierM.HugF.DorelS.DeschampsT.TuckerK.LacourpailleL. (2019).
Do individual differences in the distribution of activation between synergist muscles reflect individual strategies?Experimental Brain Research,
237(3), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5445-6
4.
DanielsR. J.CookS. B. (2017).
Effect of instructions on EMG during the bench press in trained and untrained males. Human Movement Science,
55, 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.08.010
5.
De LucaC. J. (1984).
Myoelectrical manifestations of localized muscular fatigue in humans. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering,
11(4), 251–279.
6.
DrissT.SerrauV.BehmD. G.Lesne-ChabranE.Le Pellec-MullerA.VandewalleH. (2014).
Isometric training with maximal co-contraction instruction does not increase co-activation during exercises against external resistances. Journal of Sports Sciences,
32(1), 60–69.
7.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009).
Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods,
41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
8.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007).
G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,
39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
9.
FujitaR. A.MarchiP. U.De, SilvaN. R. S.GomesM. M. (2019).
Verbal instruction does not change myoelectric activity during seated row exercise in trained and untrained men. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física,
25(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574201900040100
10.
FujitaR. A.SilvaN. R. S.BedoB. L. S.SantiagoP. R. P.GentilP. R. V.GomesM. M. (2020).
Mind–muscle connection: Limited effect of verbal instructions on muscle activity in a seated row exercise. Perceptual and Motor Skills . Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520926369
GarberC. E.BlissmerB.DeschenesM. R.FranklinB. A.LamonteM. J.LeeI.-M.NiemanD. C., & American College of Sports Medicine. (2011).
Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,
43(7), 1334–1359. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb
13.
GentilP.BottaroM.NollM.WernerS.VasconcelosJ. C.SeffrinA.CamposM. H. (2017).
Muscle activation during resistance training with no external load – effects of training status, movement velocity, dominance, and visual feedback. Physiology & Behavior,
179, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.06.004
14.
HermensH. J.FreriksB.Disselhorst-KlugC.RauG. (2000).
Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology: Official Journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology,
10(5), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4
MacKenzieS. J.RannelliL. A.YurchevichJ. J. (2010).
Neuromuscular adaptations following antagonist resisted training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
24(1), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bd4317
17.
MaeoS.TakahashiT.TakaiY.KanehisaH. (2013).
Trainability of muscular activity level during maximal voluntary co-contraction: Comparison between bodybuilders and nonathletes. PloS One,
8(11), e79486. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079486
18.
MaeoS.YoshitakeY.TakaiY.FukunagaT.KanehisaH. (2014a).
Effect of short-term maximal voluntary co-contraction training on neuromuscular function. International Journal of Sports Medicine,
35(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1349137
19.
MaeoS.YoshitakeY.TakaiY.FukunagaT.KanehisaH. (2014b).
Neuromuscular adaptations following 12-week maximal voluntary co-contraction training. European Journal of Applied Physiology,
114(4), 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-013-2801-x
20.
MarchantD. C.GreigM.ScottC. (2009).
Attentional focusing instructions influence force production and muscular activity during isokinetic elbow flexions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
23(8), 2358–2366. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b8d1e5
21.
McNairP. J.DepledgeJ.BrettkellyM.StanleyS. N. (1996).
Verbal encouragement: Effects on maximum effort voluntary muscle: Action. British Journal of Sports Medicine,
30(3), 243–245.
22.
PachecoM. M.NewellK. M. (2018).
Transfer of a learned coordination function: Specific, individual and generalizable. Human Movement Science,
59, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2018.03.019
23.
PaoliA.MancinL.SaoncellaM.GrigolettoD.PacelliF. Q.ZamparoP.SchoenfeldB. J.MarcolinG. (2019).
Mind-muscle connection: Effects of verbal instructions on muscle activity during bench press exercise. European Journal of Translational Myology,
29(2), 8250. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2019.8250
24.
SerrauV.DrissT.VandewalleH.BehmD. G.Lesne-ChabranE.Le Pellec-MullerA. (2012).
Muscle activation of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles during self-resistance exercises: Comparison of unilateral maximal cocontraction and bilateral self-resistance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
26(9), 2468–2477. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823bc0a2
25.
SinglaD.HussainM. E.BhatiP.MoizJ. A.AhmadI.VermaS.AliK. (2018).
Reliability of electromyographic assessment of biceps brachii and triceps brachii in cricketers. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine,
17(3), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2018.04.001
26.
SnyderB. J.LeechJ. R. (2009).
Voluntary increase in latissimus dorsi muscle activity during the lat pull-down following expert instruction. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
23(8), 2204–2209. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bb7213
27.
Snyder, B. J., & FryW. R. (2012).
Effect of verbal instruction on muscle activity during the bench press exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
26(9), 2394–2400. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f8d11
28.
TingL. H.ChielH. J.TrumbowerR. D.AllenJ. L.McKayJ. L.HackneyM. E.KesarT. M. (2015).
Neuromechanical principles underlying movement modularity and their implications for rehabilitation. Neuron,
86(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.042
29.
WulfG.PrinzW. (2001).
Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
8(4), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196201
30.
ZbidiS.ZinoubiB.HammoudaO.VandewalleH.SerrauV.DrissT. (2017).
Co-contraction training, muscle explosive force and associated electromyography activity. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,
57(6), 725–733. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06363-5
