Using the Turkish portion of the Programme for International Student Assessment dataset (N = 4,848; 51% boys, 49% girls; age, M = 15.81 years, SD = 0.28), this study investigated factors associated with mathematics achievement among Turkish students. Three different models were estimated using the method of balanced repeated replication with Fay’s method and taking into account the presence of five plausible values of the dependent variable. Results showed that male students and older students had better mathematics proficiency. Socio-economic status and school resources also played a significant role in explaining student achievement in mathematics. Finally, students who were more open to problem solving, who attributed their failure to external factors, and who were intrinsically motivated to learn mathematics achieved higher scores. Policy implications are provided.
AlacaciC.ErbasA. K. (2010) Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development30(2): 182–192.
2.
AsendorphJ. B.Van AkenM. A. G. (2003) Personality-relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality71(4): 629–662.
3.
BakerS. R. (2004) Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance. Current Psychology23(3): 189–202.
4.
BanduraA. (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist44(9): 1175–1184.
5.
BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.RabascaA.PastorelliC. (2003) A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences34(4): 645–664.
6.
BeckerM.McElvanyN.KortenbruckM. (2010) Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology102(4): 773–785.
7.
BerberogluG.KalenderI. (2005) Öğrenci baş arısının yıllara, okul türlerine, bölgelere göre incelenmesi: OSS ve PISA analizi. Egitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama4(7): 21–35.
8.
BoyerW. (2006) Accentuate the positive: The relationship between positive explanatory style and academic achievement of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education21(1): 53–63.
9.
BrownlowS.ReasingerR. D. (2001) Putting off until tomorrow what is better than today: Academic procrastination as a function of motivation toward college work. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality15(5): 15–34.
10.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.ConsiglioC.PicconiL.ZimbardoP. G. (2003) Personalities of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(4): 849.
11.
CapraraG. V.VecchioneM.AlessandriG.GerbinoM.BarbaranelliC. (2011) The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology81(1): 78–96.
12.
ColemanJ. S. (1966) Equality of educational opportunity (COLEMAN) study (EEOS), Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor)doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06389.v3.
13.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
14.
DeciE. L.VallerandR. J.PelletierL. G.RyanR. M. (1991) Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist26(3–4): 325–346.
15.
De RaadB.SchouwenburgH. C. (1996) Personality in learning and education: A review. European Journal of Personality10(5): 303–336.
16.
DincerM. A.UysalG. (2010) The determinants of student achievement in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development30(6): 592–598.
17.
EhmkeT.DrechselB.CarstensenC. H. (2008) Klassenwiederholen in PISA-I-Plus: Was lernen Sitzenbleiber in Mathematik dazu? [Grade retention in PISA-I-Plus: What do retained students learn in mathematics?]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft11(3): 368–387.
GanzeboomH. B. G.De GraafP. M.TreimanD. J. (1992) A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research21(1): 1–56.
20.
GanzeboomH. B. G.TreimanD. J. (1996) Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research25(3): 201–239.
21.
GreenwaldR.HedgesL. V.LaineR. D. (1996) The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research66(3): 361–396.
22.
Hanushek, E. A. (2008). Education production functions. In S. N. Durlauf, & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed., pp. 1–6). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.0448
23.
LaneJ.LaneA. (2001) Self-efficacy and academic performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal29(7): 687–694.
24.
LaneJ.LaneA. M.KyprianouA. (2004) Self-efficacy, self-esteem and their impact on academic performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal32(3): 247–256.
25.
LeeJ.StankovL. (2013) Higher-order structure of non-cognitive constructs and prediction of PISA 2003 mathematics achievement. Learning and Individual Differences26: 119–130.
26.
LiuK. S.ChengY. Y.ChenY. L.WuY. Y. (2009) Longitudinal effects of educational expectations and achievement attributions on adolescents’ academic achievements. Adolescence44(176): 911–924.
MarínM.InfanteE.TroyanoY. (2001) Personality and academic productivity in the university student. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal3(29): 299–306.
29.
MayerD. P.MullensJ. E.MooreM. T. (2001) Monitoring school quality: An indicators report. Education Statistics Quarterly3(1): 38–44.
30.
MeisenbergG.WoodleyM. A. (2013) Are cognitive differences between countries diminishing? Evidence from TIMSS and PISA. Intelligence41(6): 808–816.
31.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013a). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en.
32.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013b). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn – students’ engagement, drive and self- beliefs (Volume III). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201170-en.
OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. I, Rev. ed., February 2014). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en.
35.
O’SullivanJ. T.HoweM. L. (1996) Causal attributions and reading achievement: Individual differences in low-income families. Contemporary Educational Psychology21(4): 363–387.
36.
PaunonenS. V.AshtonM. C. (2001) Big five predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality35(1): 78–90.
37.
PoropatA. E. (2009) A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin135(2): 322–338.
38.
SchleicherA. (2007) Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundamental school knowledge 15-year-olds should possess?Journal of Educational Change8(4): 349–357.
39.
SchleicherA. (2010) Assessing literacy across a changing world. Science328(5977): 433–434.
40.
RossC. E.BrohB. A. (2000) The roles of self-esteem and the sense of personal control in the academic achievement process. Sociology of Education73(4): 270–284.
41.
Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2005). Effect of private tutoring on University entrance examination performance in Turkey. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1609. Available at SSRN. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=721925.
42.
VispoelW. P.AustinJ. R. (1995) Success and failure in junior high school: A critical incident approach to understanding students’ attributional beliefs. American Educational Research Journal32(2): 377–412.
43.
WatkinsD.GutierrezM. (2001) Causal relationships among self-concept, attributions, and achievement in Filipino students. The Journal of Social Psychology130(5): 625–631.
44.
WeinerB. (1980) Human motivation, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
45.
WeinerB. (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review92(4): 548–573.
46.
WeinerB. (2010) The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist45(1): 28–36.
47.
Wu, M. (2010). Comparing the similarities and differences of PISA 2003 and TIMSS. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 32. OECD Publishing (NJ1). [Online]. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km4psnm13nx-en.
48.
YayanB.BerberogluG. (2004) A re-analysis of the TIMSS 1999 mathematics assessment data of the Turkish students. Studies in Educational Evaluation30(1): 87–104.
