This paper identifies some ways to effectively transfer complex and gender-biased technology information and knowledge (TIK) to both men and women by analyzing the diffusion of Smart-valleys technology in West-Africa. ANOVA and Fisher's exact tests were applied to data collected from 1120 lowland rice farmers in West Africa. Results confirm the general gender inequality in TIK communication with male farmers having more access to Smart-valleys TIK than female lowland farmers. Only few female communicators were used in Smart-valleys TIK transfer even if they were found to be as efficient as men at communicating and teaching. However, opposite results obtained in Togo in particular reveal that it is possible to ensure gender equality in agricultural TIK communication, even in case of complex and gender-bias technologies, if specific gender mainstreaming and gender equity actions are undertaken during technology diffusion. Women-to-women communication improved female farmers access to Smart-valleys TIK confirming that involving female communicators will reduce gender inequality in TIK diffusion. On-farm demonstration was identified as the most effective approach, not only in Smart-valleys TIK communication, but also in ensuring gender equity in access of both male and female farmers to the TIK. Therefore, on-farm demonstration combined with oral explanations should be adopted as the main approach in complex and gender-biased technologies diffusion in general, and in Smart-valleys diffusion in particular.
AchandiELMujawamariyaGAgboh-NoameshieAR, et al. (2018) Women’s access to agricultural technologies in rice production and processing hubs: A comparative analysis of Ethiopia, Madagascar and Tanzania. Journal of Rural Studies60: 188–198.
2.
Adamsone-FiskovicaAGrivinsMBurtonRJF, et al. (2021) Disentangling critical success factors and principles of on-farm agricultural demonstration events, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension27(5): 639–656.
3.
AddisonMMujawamariyaGBamR (2019) Gender considerations in development and utilization of technological innovations: Evidence from Ghana. Development in Practice 30(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2019.163226.
4.
Africa Rice Center (2015) Final technical report of the Sawah, Market Access and Rice Technologies for Inland Valleys (SMART-IV) project. 109 pages with DVD, Cotonou, Benin.
5.
Agboh-NoameshieAKaboreAMisikoM (2013) Integrating gender considerations in rice research for development in Africa. In: WopereisMJohnsonDAhmadiN, et al. (eds) Realizing Africa’s Rice Promise. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI. 343–354.
6.
AkeredoluM (2009) Female students’ participation in the University Mid-Career Agricultural Extension Training Programme in West Africa: Constraints and challenges. In: 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education (AIAEE), InterContinental San Juan Resort in Puerto Rico, US, May 24–27, 2009.
7.
BaileyAPGarforthCJAngellB, et al. (2006) Helping farmers adjust to policy reforms through demonstration farms: Lessons from a project in England. Journal of Farm Management12 (10): 613–625.
8.
BenYishayAJonesMKondylisF, et al. (2019) Gender gaps in technology diffusion. Journal of Development Economics143(3):102380,
9.
BonwellCCEisonJA (1991) Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Washington DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
10.
BrownBLlewellynRNubergI (2018) Global learnings to inform the local adaptation of conservation agriculture in eastern and Southern Africa. Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment17: 213–220.
11.
BrownBNubergILlewellynR (2017) Stepwise frameworks for understanding the utilization of conservation agriculture in Africa. Agricultural Systems153: 11–22.
12.
CoulshedV (1993) Active learning: Implications for teaching in social work education. British Journal of Social Work23(1): 1–13.
13.
CruzJLAlbisuLMZamoranoJP, et al. (2021) Agricultural interactive knowledge models: researchers’ perceptions about farmers’ knowledges and information sources in Spain. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension28(3): 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1932537.
DefoerTDuguéM-JLoosveltM, et al. (2017) Smart-valleys: Manuel du Formateur–Facilitateur. Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, Centre du riz pour l’Afrique (AfricaRice), pp. 130.
16.
DhehibiBRudigerUMoyoHP, et al. (2020) Agricultural technology transfer preferences of smallholder farmers in Tunisia’s arid regions. Sustainability12 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010421.
17.
DiazIINajjarD (2019) Gender and agricultural extension: Why a gender focus matters. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security. 4: 1–10.
18.
DossCR (2001) Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: Lessons from 25 years of experience, World Development29(12): 2075–2092.
19.
DueJMMagayaneFTemuA (1997) Gender again-views of female agricultural extension officers by smallholder farmers in Tanzania. World Development25(5): 713–725.
20.
DuyenTNLRañolaRFSanderBO, et al. (2021) A comparative analysis of gender and youth issues in rice production in north, central, and south Vietnam, Climate and Development13(2): 115–127,
21.
EU SCAR (2012) Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Transition - A Reflection Paper. Brussels: European Commission.
22.
EU SCAR AKIS (2019) Preparing for Future AKIS in Europe. European Union’s Standing Committee on Agricultural Research. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://scar-europe.org/index.php/akis-documents
23.
FAO (2011) The State of Food and Agriculture. Women in Agriculture. Closing the gender gap for development. Rome, IT: FAO.
24.
FAO (2013). Climate Smart Agriculture Sourcebook. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy.
25.
FAO (2018). Developing gender-sensitive value chains. Guidelines for practitioners. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy.
26.
GatesMF (2014) Putting women and girls at the center of development. Science (New York, N.Y.)2014 (345): 1273–1275
27.
Hird-YoungerMSimpsonB (2013) Women Extension Volunteers: An Extension Approach for Female Farmers. MEAS Case Study # 2. Available athttps://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KVFK.pdf(accessed July 2022).
28.
HiremathS (2021) Role of NGOs in promoting women empowerment. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science9 (3):9–13.
29.
HörnerDBouguenAFrölichM, et al. (2022) Knowledge and adoption of Complex agricultural technologies: Evidence from an extension experiment. The World Bank Economic Review36 (1): 68–90.
30.
InterAcademy Partnership (2018) Opportunities for Future Research and Innovation on Food and Nutrition Security and Agriculture: The Interacademy Partnership’s Global Perspective. Synthesis by IAP Based on Four Regional Academy Network Studies. Washington: InterAcademy Partnership.
31.
JackBK (2013) Market inefficiencies and the adoption of agricultural technologies in developing countries. Center for International Development (CID), Working Papers
32.
KatungiEEdmeadesSSmaleM (2008). Gender, social capital and information exchange in rural Uganda, Journal of International Development20: 35–52.
33.
KempDRMichalkDL (2011) Development of sustainable livestock systems on grasslands in north-western China. In: International Grassland Congress, International Rangeland Conference, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Hohhot, China. 2008.
34.
Kinkingninhoun MedagbeFMKomatsuSMujawamariyaG, et al. (2020) Men and women in rice farming in Africa: A cross-country investigation of labor and its determinants. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems4: 117.
35.
KlerkxLVan MierloBLeeuwisC (2012) Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions. In: DarnhoferIGibbonDDedieuB (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Dordrecht: Springer Science Business Mediapp, pp. 457–483.
36.
KondylisFMuellerVSheriffV, et al. (2016) Do female instructors reduce gender bias in diffusion of sustainable land management techniques? Experimental evidence from Mozambique. World Development78(2016): 436–449.
37.
KoutsourisAZarokostaE (2020) Supporting bottom-up innovative initiatives throughout the spiral of innovations: Lessons from rural Greece. Journal of Rural Studies73: 176–185.
38.
Lamontagne-GodwinJWilliamsFEAslamN, et al. (2018) Gender differences in use and preferences of agricultural information sources in Pakistan. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension24(5): 419–434.
39.
LiyanageCElhagTBallalT (2012) Establishing a connection between knowledge transfer and innovation diffusion. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice13(1). ISSN 1705-9232
40.
LugmanMSaqibRShiweiX, et al. (2018) Barriers to gender equality in agricultural extension in Pakistan: Evidence from district sargodha. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture34(1): 136–143.
41.
LukesS (2005) Power: A Radical View. Second edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
MardianaHKembauwE (2020) The Role of Diffusion of Innovation in Agricultural to Compete in Asean Community. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 755, Annual Conference on Health and Food Science Technology, 25 November 2020, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
43.
Meinzen-DickRSQuisumbingABehrmanJ, et al. (2010). Engendering agricultural research. IFPRI Discussion paper, Washington, DC, pp. 1–63.
44.
MillerNBoudD (1996) Animating learning from experience. In: BoudDMiller N (eds), Working with Experience. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 3–13.
45.
MillerRLCoxL (2006) Technology transfer preferences of researchers and producers in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Extension44(3). http://www.joe.org/joe/2006june/rb2p.shtml
46.
MoschitzHRoepDBrunoriG, et al. (2015) Learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture: Processes of coevolution, joint reflection and facilitation. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension21(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.991111.
47.
MujawamariyaGZennaNLeonardL, et al. (2022) A gendered outlook into the adoption of improved rice varieties in Madagascar. Gender, Technology and Development26(1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2034095.
48.
MungaiCOpondoMOutaG, et al. (2017) Uptake of climate-smart agriculture through a gendered intersectionality lens: experiences from Western Kenya. In: Leal FilhoWBelaySKalanguJ, et al. (eds) Climate Change Adaptation in Africa. Climate Change Management. Cham: Springer, International Publishing, pp. 587–601.
49.
MuriisaRK (2010) The role of NGOs in addressing gender inequality and HIV/AIDS in Uganda, Canadian Journal of African Studies/La Revue Canadienne des études Africaines44(3): 605–623,
50.
NjukiJParkinsJRKalerA (2016) Transforming Gender and Food Security in the Global South. Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment, New York, ISBN 9781138680418.
51.
NyasimiMKimeliPSayulaG, et al. (2017) Adoption and dissemination pathways for climate-smart agriculture technologies and practices for climate-resilient livelihoods in lushoto, northeast Tanzania. Climate5: 2–22.
52.
PokrzywaM (2018) The role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in women’s education in Poland. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership4 (1): 15–20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijlel/issue/39629/468946.
53.
QuisumbingAPandolfelliL (2009) Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints, and interventions. World Development38(4): 581–592.
54.
RagasaC (2012) Gender and institutional dimensions of agricultural technology adoption: a review of literature and synthesis of 35 case studies. In: International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial conference, Foz do Iguacu, 18–24 Aug 2012.
55.
RagasaC (2014) Improving gender responsiveness of agricultural extension. In: Quisumbing AR, Meinzen-Dick R, Raney TL, et al. (eds) Gender in Agriculture: Closing the Knowledge gap. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 411–430.
56.
RagasaCBerhaneGTadesseF, et al. (2013) Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension19(5): 437–468,
57.
RiceMJApgarJMSchwarzAM, et al. (2019) Can agricultural research and extension be used to challenge the processes of exclusion and marginalization?The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension25(1): 79–94.
58.
RichardsonJG (2003) On-farm demonstrations: Consideration factors for their success and viability as an extension teaching tool. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension32(1): 114–124.
59.
RiunguCMaatHVan Den BergM (2021) High-yielding seeds in unyielding environments: Examining the learning process of maize and bean producers in eastern and midwestern Uganda. Outlook on Agriculture50(4): 418–440.
60.
SameeDFNosheenHNKhanIA, et al. (2015) Women in Agriculture in Pakistan. Islamabad: FAO.
61.
SrivastavaLAustinMJ (2012) Women and nongovernmental organizations in developing countries. Social Development Issues34(1): 77–91.
62.
SutherlandL-ABurtonRJFAdamsone-FiskovicaA, et al. (2021b) Inclusivity of on-farm demonstration: Gender, age, and geographic location. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension27(5): 591–613,
63.
SutherlandL-AMarchandF (2021a) On-farm demonstration: Enabling peer-to-peer learning. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension27(5): 573–590.
64.
TheriaultVSmaleMHaiderH (2017) How does gender affect sustainable intensification of cereal production in the West African sahel? Evidence from Burkina Faso. World Development92: 177–191
65.
ThorntonPKSchuetzTForchW, et al. (2017) Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based. Agricultural Systems152: 145–153.
66.
TruongTNCYamadaR (2002) Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of technologies in farming system: A case study in O’Mon district, can tho province, Mekong Delta. Omorice10: 94–100.
67.
Van Den BergHJigginsJ (2007) Investing in farmers-the impacts of farmer field schools in relation to integrated pest management. World Development35(4): 663–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.004.
68.
WestermannOAshbyJPrettyJ (2005) Gender and social capital: The importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development33(11): 1783–1799
69.
WilliamsFETaronA (2020) Demand-led extension: A gender analysis of attendance and key crops. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension26(4): 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1726778.
70.
World Bank (2009) Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. Washington, DC: World Bank.
71.
World Bank and IFPRI (2010) Gender and governance in rural services: Insights from India, Ghana, and Ethiopia. Washington, DC: IFPRI and World Bank.
72.
World Bank, FAO and IFAD (2008) Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. Washington, DC: World Bank.
73.
ZossouEArounaADiagneA, et al. (2016) Gender gap in acquisition and practice of agricultural knowledge: Case study of rice farming in West Africa. Experimental Agriculture53(04): 566–577.
74.
ZwartSJWorouSGbaguidiF., et al. (2013) A low-cost participatory development approach for rice cultivation in inland valleys. In: Africa Rice congress: 3rd Africa rice: Rice science for food security through smallholder and Agri-business development in Africa, Yaoundé, 21–24 October 2013, 1–16.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
