For schools and academic studies to continue, children as well must adhere to the measures taken to prevent the spread of Covid-19. The aim of this study was to develop a scale to assess schoolchildren’s attitudes toward Covid-19 measures. The sample of this study, which was designed in a methodological type, consisted of 205 children. This study was conducted at primary schools in Zonguldak, Turkey. The validity of content and construct was examined to evaluate the validity of the Schoolchildren’s Attitudes toward Covid-19 Measures Scale. This scale is a valid and reliable measure for assessing the attitudes of schoolchildren toward Covid-19 measures. The results of the factor analysis indicated a scale with 28 items and six factors. Cronbach’s alpha value for the overall scale is 0.928. According to the results of the analysis, the developed scale was found to have excellent content and construct validity and reliability for schoolchildren.
AkatM.KarataşK. (2020). Psychological effects of COVID-19 pandemic on society and its reflections on education. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(4), 1–14.
2.
BurnsN.GroveS. K. (2009). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. Elsevier Saunders.
3.
Cachón-ZagalazJ.Sánchez-ZafraM.Sanabrias-MorenoD.González-ValeroG.Lara-SánchezA. J.Zagalaz-SánchezM. L. (2020). Systematic review of the literature about the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of school children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 569348.
4.
ÇapıkC. (2014). Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı [Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies]. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi [Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences], 17(3), 196–205.
5.
ChenW. (2010). Internet-usage patterns of immigrants in the process of intercultural adaptation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(4), 387–399.
6.
ChenS. W.RiceS.StoreyK.KeglovitsM.DevineM.YanY. (2022). COVID-19: Factors predicting depressive symptoms in people aging with long-term physical disabilities. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 2022, Article 15394492221107557.
7.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1419.
8.
DoğruS. S.ArslanE. (2008). Engelli çocuğu olan annelerin sürekli kaygı düzeyi ile durumluk kaygı düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of trait anxiety levels and state anxiety levels of mothers with disabled children]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Selcuk University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences].
9.
ElliottM. L.KnodtA. R.IrelandD.MorrisM. L.PoultonR.RamrakhaS.HaririA. R. (2020). What is the test-retest reliability of common task-functional MRI measures? New empirical evidence and a meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 31(7), 792–806.
10.
GawkeJ. C.GorgievskiM. J.BakkerA. B. (2019). Measuring intrapreneurship at the individual level: Development and validation of the employee intrapreneurship scale (EIS). European Management Journal, 37(6), 806–817.
GhoshS.ParishS. (2013). Prevalence and economic well-being of families raising multiple children with disabilities. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1431–1439.
13.
GuptaS.JawandaM. K. (2020). The impacts of COVID-19 on children. Acta Paediatrica, 109(11), 2181–2183.
14.
HayesA. F.CouttsJ. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24.
15.
JalongoM. R. (2021). The effects of COVID-19 on early childhood education and care: Research and resources for children, families, teachers, and teacher educators. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(5), 763–774.
16.
KaragozY. (2016). SPSSS ve AMOS 23 uygulamalı İstatistiksel analizler [SPSS and AMOS 23 applied statistical analysis]. Nobel Akademik.
17.
KimberlinL. C.WintersteinG. A. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65, 2276–2284.
18.
LedesmaR. D.Valero-MoraP.MacbethG. (2015). The scree test and the number of factors: A dynamic graphics approach. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2015, 18–21.
19.
LoBiondo-WoodG.HaberJ. (2017). Nursing research-E-book: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
20.
NguyenH. T.DoB. N.PhamK. M.KimG. B.DamH. T.NguyenT. T.DuongT. V. (2020). Fear of COVID-19 scale—associations of its scores with health literacy and health-related behaviors among medical students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), Article 4164.
21.
O’ConnorC.JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, Article 1609406919899220.
22.
OzdamarK. (2017). Ölçek ve test geliştirme yapısal eşitlik modellemesi [scale and test development structural equation modeling].Nisan Kitabevi [Nisan Bookstore].
23.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497.
24.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T.OwenS. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467.
25.
SaraswathiI.SaikarthikJ.KumarK. S.SrinivasanK. M.ArdhanaariM.GunapriyaR. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the mental health status of undergraduate medical students in a COVID-19 treating medical college: A prospective longitudinal study. PeerJ, 8, Article e10164.
26.
ŞencanH. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal Ölçümlerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik [reliability and validity in social and behavioral measurements].Seçkin Yayıncılık [Seçkin Publication].
WhiteK. A. (2014). Development and validation of a tool to measure self-confidence and anxiety in nursing students during clinical decision making. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(1), 14–22.
