Facebook not only changed the way we communicate but also the way we mourn and express grief. The social networking site allows users to interact with deceased users’ walls after death. This study utilized textual analysis to categorize Facebook posts (N = 122) on 30 deceased users’ walls according to uses and gratifications theory. Most posts were found to be motivated by entertainment, followed by integration and social interaction. Facebook users posted memories, condolences, and interacted with friends and family members in the deceased user’s network. Implications and potential future research are discussed.
AncuM. (2012) Older adults on facebook: A survey examination of motives and use of social networking by people 50 and older. Florida Communication Journal40(2): 1–12.
2.
BaekK.HoltonA.HarpD.YaschurC. (2011) The links that bind: Uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior27(6): 2243–2248.
3.
BergerA. A. (1998) Media research techniques, 2nd ed. London, England: Sage Publications, Inc.
4.
BlumlerJ. G. (1979) The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies. Communication Research6(1): 9–36.
5.
Brubaker, J. R., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). We will never forget you [online]: An empirical investigation of post-mortem myspace comments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China.
6.
BrubakerJ. R.HayesG. R.DourishP. (2013) Beyond the grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning. The Information Society29(3): 152–163.
7.
CarrollB.LandryK. (2010) Logging on and letting out: Using online social networks to grieve and to mourn. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30(5): 341–349.
8.
CheungC. M.ChiuP. Y.LeeM. K. (2011) Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook?Computers in Human Behavior27(4): 1337–1343.
9.
DegrootJ. M. (2012) Maintaining relational continuity with the deceased on Facebook. Journal of Death and Dying65(3): 195–212.
10.
DoblerR. (2009) Ghosts in the machine: Mourning the myspace dead. In: BlankT. (ed.) Folklore and the Internet: Vernacular expression in a digital world, Logan, UT: Utah State University Press, pp. 175–193.
11.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168.
FurisichE. (2009) In defense of textual analysis. Journalism Studies10(2): 238–252.
16.
GadekarR.KirshnatrayP.GaurS. (2012) A descriptive study of facebook uses among Indian Students. Media Asia39(3): 140–147.
17.
GeertzC. (1973) Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culutre. In: GeertzC. (ed.) The Interpretation of Cultures, New York, NY: Basic Books, pp. 3–30.
18.
GlynnC. J.HugeM. E.HoffmanL. H. (2012) All the news that’s fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior28(1): 113–119.
19.
GonzalesA. L.HancockJ. T. (2011) Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking14(1–2): 79–83.
20.
GoodmanL. A. (1961) Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics32(1): 148–170.
21.
GroverR. J.FowlerS. G. (2011) Helping those experience loss: A guide to grieving resources, Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
22.
HaL.JamesE. L. (1998) Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media42(4): 457–474.
23.
HamptonK.WellmanB. (2003) Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community2(4): 277–311.
24.
HargittaiE. (2007) Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): 276–297.
25.
HessA. (2007) In digital remembrance: Vernacular memory and the rhetorical construction of web memorials. Media, Culture & Society29(5): 812–830.
26.
HockeyJ.KatzJ.SmallN. (2001) Grief, mourning and death ritual, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
27.
HuntD.AtkinD.KrishnanA. (2012) The influence of computer-mediated communication apprehension on motives for Facebook use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(2): 187–202.
28.
IrwinM. D. (2015) Mourning 2.0—Continuing bonds between the living and the dead on Facebook. Journal of Death and Dying72(2): 119–150.
29.
KastenbaumR. (2000) The psychology of death, New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
30.
KatzE.BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1973) Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly37: 509–523.
31.
Kübler-RossE. (2009) On death and dying: What the dying have to teach doctors, nurses, clergy and their own families, Abingdon, England: Taylor & Francis.
32.
Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B., & Steinfield, C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, San Diego, CA.
33.
LinC. A. (2001) Audience attributes, media supplementation, and likely online service adoption. Mass Communication & Society4(1): 19–38.
34.
LoflandL. H. (1985) The social shaping of emotion: The case of grief*. Symbolic Interaction8(2): 171–190.
35.
MarwickA.EllisonN. B. (2012) “There isn’t Wifi in heaven!” negotiating visibility on facebook memorial pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(3): 378–400.
36.
McAndrewF. T.JeongH. S. (2012) Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior28(6): 2359–2365.
37.
McQuailD. (1983) Mass communication theory, 1st ed. London, England: Sage Publications, Inc.
38.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1984) Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39.
NadkarniA.HofmannS. G. (2012) Why do people use Facebook?Personality and Individual Differences52(3): 243–249.
40.
ParkN.KeeK. F.ValenzuelaS. (2009) Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior12(6): 729–733.
41.
PeluchetteJ.KarlK. (2010) Examining students’ intended image on Facebook: “What were they thinking?!”. Journal of Education for Business85(1): 30–37.
42.
Quan-HaaseA.YoungA. L. (2010) Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society30(5): 350–361.
43.
RaackeJ.Bonds-RaackeJ. (2008) Myspace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior11(2): 169–174.
44.
RobertsP.VidalL. A. (2000) Perpetual care in cyberspace: A portrait of memorials on the web. Omega: The Journal of Death and Dying40(4): 521–546.
45.
RossC.OrrE. S.SisicM.ArseneaultJ. M.SimmeringM. G.OrrR. R. (2009) Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior25(2): 578–586.
46.
RuggieroT. E. (2000) Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society3(1): 3–37.
47.
ShaoG. (2009) Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research19(1): 7–25.
48.
SheldonP. (2008) The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications20(2): 67.
TsaoJ. C.SibleyS. D. (2004) Readership of free community papers as a source of advertising information: A uses and gratifications perspective. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(4): 766–787.
51.
UristaM. A.QingwenD.DayK. D. (2009) Explaining why young adults use Myspace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication12(2): 215–229.
52.
Villegas, J., Mi Jung, K., & Cabrera, C. E. C. (2011). The influence of social media usage and online social capital on advertising perceptions. Paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings, Albuquerque, NM.
53.
WohnD. Y.LeeY.-H. (2013) Players of facebook games and how they play. Entertainment Computing4(3): 171–178.
