Social media is a growing phenomenon, yet people with intellectual disability (ID) may not experience comparable access to this communication technology. Adolescents with ID may benefit from e-inclusion, especially as individuals with ID are at risk of having smaller social networks.
Materials and Methods:
The Social Network Guide was adapted to measure social media usage and used to examine the interpersonal relationships of adolescents with and without ID.
Results:
Adolescents with ID held smaller social networks with less developed informal relationships. However, friendship quality was comparable or superior to typically developing peers. Adolescents with ID interacted with a smaller percentage of contacts using social media. Social media use was predictive of the number of reported friendships and did not significantly predict critical comments.
Conclusions:
Findings suggest that adolescents with ID have comparable access to social media but use these sites to interact with a smaller number of social contacts.
AlotaibiBN (1997) Social network and social support of individuals with disabilities: A review of the literatures. Available at:http://dr-banderalotaibi.com/images/boho/e4.pdf(accessed 10 August 2013).
2.
BhardwajAForrester-JonesRMurphyG (2018) Social networks of adults with an intellectual disability from South Asian and White communities in the United Kingdom: a comparison. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities31(2): e253–e264. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12351.
3.
BrownH (1999) Abuse of people with learning disabilities: layers of concern and analysis. In: StanleyNManthorpeJPenhaleB (eds.), Institutional Abuse: Perspectives Across the Life Course. London: Routledge, pp.89–110.
4.
CatonSChapmanM (2016) The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: a systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability41(2): 125–139.
Department of Health (2001) Valuing People. A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century. White Paper. HMSO, London.
8.
Department of Health (2007) Valuing People Now. From Progress to Transformation. London: Department of Health.
9.
DesjarlaisMWilloughbyT (2010) A longitudinal study of the relation between adolescent boys and girls’ computer use with friends and friendship quality: support for the social compensation or the rich-get-richer hypothesis?Computers in Human Behavior26: 896–905.
10.
DiddenRScholteRHJKorziliuaH, et al. (2009) Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation12: 146–151. DOI: 10.1080/17518420902971356.
11.
DunbarRI (2016) Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks?Royal Society Open Science3(1): 150292.
EmersonEMcVillyK (2004) Friendship activities of adults with intellectual disabilities in supported accommodation in Northern England. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities17: 191–197.
FengJLazarJKuminL, et al. (2008) Computer usage by young individuals with Down Syndrome: An exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, Assets ‘08, pp. 35–42. New York: ACM.
16.
FisherKL (2012) Parental perspectives on young adults with Down Syndrome and online social networking sites. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
17.
Forrester-JonesRBroadhurstS (2007) Autism and Loss. London: Jessica Kingsley.
18.
Forrester-JonesRGrantG (1997) Resettlement from Large Psychiatric Hospital to Small Community Residence. Aldershot: Avebury.
19.
Forrester-JonesRCarpenterJCoolen-SchrijnerP, et al. (2006) The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in the community 12 years after resettlement from long-stay hospitals. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities19(4): 285–295.
20.
Forrester-JonesRCarpenterJCoolen-SchrijnerP, et al. (2012) Good friends are hard to find? The social networks of people with mental illness 12 years after deinstitutionalisation. Journal of Mental Health21(1): 4–14.
21.
Forrester-JonesRDietzfelbingerLStedmanD, et al. (2018) Including the “spiritual” within mental health care in the UK, from the experiences of people with mental health problems. Journal of Religion and Health57(1): 384–407. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-017-0502 -1.
22.
Forrester-JonesRJonesSHeasonS, et al. (2004) Supported employment: a route to social networks. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities17: 199–208. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00199.x.
23.
GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK (2008) Health Behaviour and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
GuralnickM (1997) Peer social networks of young boys with developmental delays. American Journal on Mental Retardation101(6): 595–612.
25.
HartupWWStevensN (1999) Friendships and adaptation across the life span. Current Directions in Psychological Science8(3): 76–79.
26.
HillRADunbarRIM (2003) Social network size in humans. Human Nature14(1): 53–72.
27.
HolmesKMO’LoughlinN (2014) The experience of people with learning disabilities on social networking sites. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. Early View. Available at:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12001/abstract(accessed 8 July 2013).
28.
Holt-LunstadJSmithTBLaytonJB (2010) Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine7(7), e1000316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316..
29.
HouseJSLandisKRUmbersonD (1988) Social relationships and health. Science241(4865): 540–545. DOI: 10.1126/science.3399889.
30.
KawachiIBerkmanLF (2001) Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health78(3): 458–467. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.458.
31.
KydlandFMolka-DanielsenJBalandinS (2012) Examining the use of social media tool “Flickr” for impact on loneliness for people with intellectual disability. In: NOKOBIT 2012: Proceedings of the 2012 Norsk konferanse for organisasjoners bruk av informasjonsteknologi, Akademika forlag, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 253–264.
MargaryanALittlejohnAVojtG (2011) Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education56: 429–440. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.
MazurekMOShattuckPTWagnerM, et al. (2012) Prevalence and correlates of screen-based media use among youths with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders42(8): 1757–1767.
37.
McVillyKRStancliffeRJParmenterTR, et al. (2006) Adults with intellectual disabilities discuss loneliness. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities19: 191–203. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00261.x.
ParkLECrockerJMickelsonKD (2004) Attachment styles and contingencies of self-worth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30(10): 1243–1254. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204264000.
40.
RaghavendraPHutchinsonCGraceE, et al. (2018) “I like talking to people on the computer”: Outcomes of a home-based intervention to develop social media skills in youth with disabilities living in rural communities. Research in Developmental Disabilities76: 110–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.012.
41.
ReichSMSubrahmanyamKEspinozaG (2012) Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescent’s online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology48(2): 356–368. DOI: 10.1037/a0026980.
42.
RobertsonJEmersonEGregoryN, et al. (2001) Social networks of people with mental retardation in residential settings. Mental Retardation39(3): 201–214.
43.
SangoPForrester-JonesR (2017) Spirituality and social networks of people with intellectual and developmental disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability [Online], 21(3): 280–295. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2017.1310820..
44.
ThelwellM (2008) Social networks, gender and friending: An analysis of MySpace member profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59: 1321–1330.
45.
TraceyEMAbellN (1994) Social network map: assessing social support in clinical practice. Social network map: some further refinements on administration. Social Work Research18: 56–60.
46.
TurkleS (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
47.
ValkenburgPPeterJ (2007) Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology43: 267–277.
48.
VallorS (2012) Flourishing on facebook: virtue friendship and the new social media. Ethics and Information Technology4: 185–199.
49.
van SchalkwykGIMarinCEOrtizM, et al. (2017) Social media use, friendship quality, and the moderating role of anxiety in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders47(9): 2805–2813.
50.
WebsterAACarterM (2007) Social relationships and friendships of children with developmental disabilities: implications for inclusive settings. A systematic review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability32(3): 200–213.
51.
Wenz-GrossMSipersteinGN (1997) Importance of social support in the adjustment of children with learning problems. Exceptional Children63(2): 183–193.
52.
WethingtonEKesslerRC (1986) Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour27(1): 78–89.
53.
WilsonJ (2003) Mentors: paving the transition from school to adulthood for students with disabilities. American Rehabilitation27(1): 0–2.
54.
YoungSN (2008) The neurobiology of human social behaviour: an important but neglected topic. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience33(5): 391–392.
55.
ZhaoYQuiW (2011) The potential of social media for students with disabilities. In: GrayTSilver-PacuillaH (eds.), Breakthrough Teaching and Learning: How Educational and Assistive Technologies are Driving Innovation. New York: Springer, pp.71–86.
