This article reflects upon a comparative analysis of the 28 ‘City Deals’ agreed between UK government, Scottish government and city-regional groupings in England and Scotland since 2011. The City Deals have sought to incentivise local actors to identify and prioritise ‘asks’ of UK and devolved governments, fund, finance and deliver infrastructure and other economic development interventions, and to reform city/city-region governance structures to ‘unlock’ urban growth. Our analysis is based upon 32 in-depth interviews with lead actors in the City Deals, including elected officials from local government, central government officials and policy specialists from think tanks, as well as a secondary literature review. We find that City Deals are reworking the role of the UK state internally and through changed central-local and intra-local (city-regional) relations. Regional and urban public policy is being recast as a process of deal-making founded upon territorial competition and negotiation between central national and local actors unequally endowed with information and resources, leading to highly imbalanced and inequitable outcomes across the UK. As a template for public policymaking in an emergent and decentralising context, deal-making raises substantive and unresolved issues for governance in the UK that are especially pertinent as the new Conservative government at Westminster pledges to widen and broaden this approach as a central component of its future devolution strategy and policy.
AghionP., BesleyT., BrowneJ., CaselliF., LambertR., LomaxR., PissaridesC. and Van ReenanJ. (2013), Investing for Prosperity: Skills Infrastructure and Innovation, a report of the LSE Growth Commission, Institute for Government/Centre for Economic Performance, London.
2.
AshtonP., DoussardM. and WeberR. (2014), ‘Reconstituting the state: city powers and exposures in Chicago's infrastructure leases’, Special Issue of Urban Studies on Financialization and the Production of Urban Space, pp. 1–17.
3.
BlondP. (2010), Red Tory: How Left and Right have Broken Britain and How We Can Fix It?, London, Faber and Faber.
4.
Cabinet Office (2010), The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, London, The Cabinet Office.
5.
Cabinet Office (2011) Unlocking Growth in Cities, London, The Cabinet Office.
6.
Cabinet Office (2011a) Open Public Services White Paper, London, The Cabinet Office.
7.
Cabinet Office (2012) City Deals Prospectus for Wave 2 Cities, London, The Cabinet Office.
8.
Centre for Cities (2012), City Deals and Making Devolution Happen, London, Centre for Cities.
9.
Centre for Cities (2013) City Deals: Insights from the Core Cities, London, Centre for Cities.
10.
ClarkeN. and CochraneA. (2013), ‘Geographies and politics of localism: the localism of the United Kingdom's coalition government’, Political Geography, 34, pp. 10–23.
11.
DCLG (2012) A Plain English Guide to Business Rates Retention: Local Government Finance Bill, London, Department for Communities and Local Government.
12.
GrahamS. and MarvinS. (2001), Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition, London, Routledge.
13.
HanrattyN. (2015), City Deal Implications and Next Steps: Report of Director of Economic Development to Cabinet, 2 April, Cardiff, City of Cardiff Council.
14.
HM Government/Sheffield City Region (2015), Sheffield City Region Agreement on Devolution, London, HM Government/Sheffield City Region.
HodgeG.A., GreveC. and BoardmanA.E. (eds) (2010), International Handbook on Public-Private Partnerships, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
20.
House of Commons (2013), ‘The Local Government Finance Settlement 2013–14 and 2014–15’, Library Research Paper, London, House of Commons.
21.
HulbertC. and VammalleC. (2014), ‘A sub-national perspective on financing investment for growth I – measuring fiscal space for public investment: influences, evolution and perspectives’, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2014/02, Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
22.
IFS (2014), Response to the 2014 Budget, London, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
23.
InderstG. (2010), ‘Infrastructure as an asset class’, EIB Papers, 15, 1, pp. 70–104.
24.
KPMG (2014), Introducing UK City Deals: A Smart Approach to Supercharging Economic Growth and Productivity, New South Wales, KPMG.
25.
KrippnerG.R. (2005), ‘The financialization of the American economy’, Socio-Economic Review, 3, 2, pp. 173–208.
26.
Leeds City Region (2012), Unlocking our Economic Potential: A Leeds City Region City Deal, Lees, Leeds City Region Local Enterprise Partnership.
27.
MaclennanD. (2012), ‘Cities and policy change in the UK: recent developments’, Scottish Cities Knowledge Centre Briefing Note (0212), Glasgow, University of Glasgow.
28.
MarlowD. (2012), ‘City Deals – Implications for enhanced devolution and local economic growth’, London, LGIU Policy Briefing.
29.
MartinR., PikeA., TylerP. and GardinerB. (2015), Spatially Rebalancing the UK Economy: The Need for a New Policy Model, Seaford, Regional Studies Association.
30.
Maxwell-JacksonQ. (2013), Build the Infrastructure: Bin the Wish List, London, Centre Forum.
31.
McFarlaneA.G. (2007), ‘Putting the ‘public’ back into public private partnerships for economic development’, Western New England Law Review, 30, 1, pp. 39–60.
32.
MoranM. and WilliamsK. (2015), “Devo-Manc’: ‘Northern Powerhouse’ or ‘Northern Poorhouse?’ SPERI Comment, 7 April, Sheffield, University of Sheffield.
33.
National Audit Office (2001), Modern Policy-Making: Ensuring Policies Deliver Value for Money: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, London, The Stationery Office.
34.
National Audit Office (2013), Funding and Structures for Local Growth: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, London, The Stationery Office.
35.
National Audit Office (2014), Financial Sustainability of Local Authorities: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, London, The Stationery Office.
36.
OECD (2014), Private Financing and Governmental Support to Promote Long-Term Investments in Infrastructure, Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
37.
O'NeillP. (2013), ‘The financialisation of infrastructure: the role of categorisation and property relations’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6, 3, pp. 441–54.
38.
PikeA., MacKinnonD., CoombesM., ChampionT., BradleyD., CumbersA., RobsonL. and WymerC. (2015a), Tackling Declining Cities: UK City Trends and International Policy Review, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
39.
PikeA., MarlowD., McCarthyA., O'BrienP. and TomaneyJ. (2015b), ‘Local institutions and local economic development: the Local Enterprise Partnerships in England, 2010-’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8 (2), pp. 185–204.
40.
PikeA., Rodriguez-PoseA., TomaneyJ., TorrisiG. and TseliosV. (2012), ‘In search of the ‘economic dividend' of devolution: spatial disparities, spatial economic policy and decentralisation in the UK’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 1, pp. 10–28.
41.
PikeA. and TomaneyJ. (2009), ‘The state and uneven development: the governance of economic development in England in the post-devolution UK’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2, 1, pp. 13–34.
42.
Scottish Government (2015), Inverness City Deal – Opportunity for Everyone to Engage, Edinburgh, Scottish Government Communications.
43.
StorperM. (2014), ‘Governing the large metropolis’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 2 (2), pp. 115–34.
TomaneyJ. and McCarthyA. (2015), ‘The Manchester Model’, Town and Country Planning, May, London, Town and Country Planning Association.
46.
TomaneyJ., PikeA., TorrisiG., TseliosV. and Rodriguez-PoseA. (2011), ‘Decentralisation outcomes: a review of evidence and analysis of international data: a report for the Department for Communities and Local Government’, CURDS, Newcastle University and the Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics.
47.
TraversT. (2012), Local Government's Role in Promoting Economic Growth: Removing Unnecessary Barriers to Success, London, Local Government Association.
48.
TraversT. (2015), ‘A near federal UK requires a constitutional settlement’, 20 May, London, Local Government Chronicle.
49.
WardG. (2015), Edinburgh and South East Scotland City Region City Deal: Report to City of Edinburgh Council Executive, 28 May, Edinburgh, City of Edinburgh Council.
