Emerging city policies: Devolution,deals and disorder

Abstract

In this article we consider whether the city policy frameworks that are currently emerging in England and Scotland, under the influence of devolution and localism, are likely to result in a locally effective yet nationally coherent set of economic outcomes or generate a disorderly pattern of local autonomies based on a series of ad hoc, local deals. Mindful of the context of slow economic growth and austerity, we look at the evolution of city policies in Scotland and England in the light of some rather fundamental requirements for cohesive decentralised policy design and implementation. Each can learn from the policy experiences of the other, but key questions remain as to whether sufficient resources and governance cohesion, to deliver greater city-led national economic growth, will emerge in England and Scotland.

Keywords

City Deals devolution economic development localism Scotland

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Watkins

(2002) Greenfields, Brownfields and Housing Development, Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Allen

Cochrane

(2010) Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antipode 42(5): 1071–1089.

Bentley

Pugalis

(2013) New directions in economic development: Localist policy discourses and the Localism Act. Local Economy 28(3): 257–274.

Birrell

(2009) The Impact of Devolution on Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.

Bounds A (2011) Manchester Council attacks ‘ideological’ cuts. Financial Times, 8 February.

Brenner

(2004) Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy 11(3): 447–488.

Bristow

(2010) Critical Reflection on Regional Competitiveness: Theory, policy, practice, Abingdon: Routledge.

Cabinet Office (2001) National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal, London: HMSO.

Cabinet Office (2012) City Deals Announced to Allow Cities to go for Growth. News release, 5 July.

10.

Cabinet Office (2013) Deputy Prime Minister Launches more ‘City Deals’. News release, 19 February.

11.

Centre for Cities (2011) Cities Outlook 2011, London: Centre for Cities.

12.

Centre for Cities (2012) Cities Outlook 2012, London: Centre for Cities.

13.

Centre for Cities (2013) Cities Outlook 2013, London: Centre for Cities.

14.

Champion T and Townsend A (2012) Great Britain’s Second Order City-Regions in Recessions, 1978–2010. SERC Discussion Paper 104. London: SERC. Available at: http://www.spatialeconomics.ac.uk/textonly/SERC/publications/download/sercdp0104.pdf (accessed 22 July 2013).

15.

Cowen

Wilton

Russell

(2008) Impacts and Outcomes of the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund, London: DCLG.

16.

Crowley

Balaram

Lee

(2012) People or Place? Urban policy in the age of austerity, London: The Work Foundation.

17.

DCLG (2006) Strong and Prosperous Communities Volume 1, Cm 6939-1. London: TSO.

18.

DCLG (2011) Updating the Evidence Base on English Cities, London: DCLG.

19.

DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework, London: DCLG.

20.

Department for Social Development (2012) Urban Regeneration and Community Development Policy Framework Consultation Document, Belfast: Department for Social Development.

21.

European Institute for Urban Affairs, School of Government and Society, Local Government Centre, Cities Research Centre, SQW Consulting, Office for Public Management and Centre for Local and Regional Government Research (2011) Long Term Evaluation of Local Area Agreements and Local Strategic Partnerships 2007–2010: Final Report. London: DCLG.

22.

Glaeser

(2011) Triumph of the City, London: Macmillan.

23.

GMCA (2012) Greater Manchester City Deal. Available at: http://www.agma.gov.uk/cms_media/files/city_deal_final_text_210312.doc (accessed 12 June 2013).

24.

Harrison

(2007) From competitive regions to competitive city regions: A new orthodoxy, but some old mistakes. Journal of Economic Geography 7(3): 311–332.

25.

Hastings

Bramley

Bailey

(2012) Serving Deprived Communities in a Recession, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

26.

Heseltine

(2012) No Stone Unturned: In Pursuit of Growth, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

27.

HM Government (2010) The Coalition: Our Programme for Government, London: Cabinet Office.

28.

HM Government (2012) Unlocking Growth in Cities: City-Deals Wave 1, London: Cabinet Office.

29.

HM Treasury (2011) National Infrastructure Plan 2011, London: TSO.

30.

HM Treasury and Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2013) Government’s Response to the Heseltine Review, Cm 8587. London: TSO.

31.

House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee (2013) Local Enterprise Partnerships. Ninth Report of Session 2012–13, HC 598. London: TSO.

32.

Howat

(2007) Choices for a Purpose: Review of Scottish Executive Budgets, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

33.

IPPR North (2012) Northern Prosperity is National Prosperity: A Strategy for Revitalising the UK Economy, Newcastle: IPPR North.

34.

Jonas

AEG

(2012) City-regionalism: Questions of distribution and politics. Progress in Human Geography 36(6): 822–829.

35.

Jones

(2010) Here we go again: The pathology of compulsive re-organisation. Local Economy 25(5/6): 373–378.

36.

London Finance Commission (2013) Raising the Capital, London: GLA.

37.

Lyons

(2007) Place-Shaping: A Shared Ambition for the Future of Local Government, London: TSO.

38.

Maclennan D and Chisholm S (eds) (2013) New Times, New Businesses: Housing Policies in an Era of Austerity. St Andrews: University of St Andrews. Available at: http://ggsrv-cold.st-andrews.ac.uk/chr/Uploads/Publications/NTNB-Project-Report%202013.pdf (accessed 17 July 2013).

39.

Maclennan

O’Sullivan

(2013) Localism, devolution and housing policies. Housing Studies 28(4): 599–615.

40.

Macleod

(2001) New regionalism reconsidered: Globalization and the remaking of political economic space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(4): 804–829.

41.

MacLeod

Goodwin

(1999) Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics, scale, and explanation. Political Geography 18(6): 697–730.

42.

Midwinter

(2009) New development: Scotland’s Concordat – an assessment of the new financial framework in central-local relations. Public Money & Management 29(1): 65–70.

43.

NIESR (2013) Budget 2013 and the OBR’s forecast: NIESR’s response. 22 March. Available at: http://niesr.ac.uk (accessed 12 June 2013).

44.

OBR (2012) Forecast Evaluation Report, October, London: TSO.

45.

ODPM (2006) State of the English Cities, London: HMSO.

46.

O’Sullivan

(1984) Misconceptions in the current housing subsidy debate. Policy and Politics 12(2): 119–144.

47.

Overman H (2011) How did London get away with it? Centrepiece (Winter 2010/2011).

48.

Parkinson

(2001) The Urban White Paper: Half Way to Paradise? New Economy 8(1): 47–51.

49.

Peck

(2011) Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography 35(6): 773–797.

50.

Pike

(2002) Task forces and the organisation of economic development: The case of the North East region of England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20(5): 717–739.

51.

Pike A, Tomaney J, Torrisi G et al. (2010) In Search of the ‘Economic Dividend’ of Devolution: Spatial Disparities, Spatial Economic Policy and Decentralisation in the UK. SERC Discussion Paper 62. London: SERC.

52.

Pugalis

Fisher

(2011) English regions disbanded: European funding and economic regeneration implications. Local Economy 26(6/7): 500–516.

53.

Pugalis L and Townsend A (2011) A novel approach to spatial development: England dismantles its regions! In: Regional development and policy development: Challenges, choices and recipients, Regional Studies Association annual international conference, Newcastle University, UK, 17–20 April 2011.

54.

Rodríguez-Pose

Ezcurra

(2010) Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from the OECD countries. Journal of Economic Geography 11(4): 619–643.

55.

Rodríguez-Pose

Gill

(2005) On the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution. Regional Studies 39(4): 405–420.

56.

Rodríguez-Pose

Sandall

(2008) From identity to the economy: Analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26(1): 54–72.

57.

Rosenthal

Strange

(2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson

Thisse

J-F

(eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics: Vol 4, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 2119–2171.

58.

Schmuecker

Lodge

Goodall

(2012) Assessing the Implications of a more Autonomous Scotland for the North of England, Newcastle: IPPR North.

59.

Scottish Executive (2003) Review of Scotland’s Cities: The Analysis, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

60.

Scottish Government (2008) Single Outcome Agreements. News release, 30 June.

61.

Scottish Government (2011a) Scotland’s Cities: Delivering for Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

62.

Scottish Government (2011b) Infrastructure Investment Plan, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

63.

Scottish Government (2011c) The Government Economic Strategy, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

64.

Scottish Government (2013) National Planning Framework 3: Main Issues Report and Draft Framework, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

65.

Taylor M, Burn-Murdoch J and Butler P (2013) Council cuts will bring local government ‘to its knees’. The Guardian, 26 March.

66.

Theodore

Peck

(2012) Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating ‘commonsense’ urban policy across the OECD. European Urban and Regional Studies 19(1): 20–41.

67.

Tiebout

(1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416–424.

68.

Travers

Whitehead

(2010) A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 Years on, Background paper. London: LSE.

69.

Urban Task Force (1999) Towards an Urban Renaissance, London: E & FN Spon.

70.

Welsh Government (2012) City Regions Final Report, Cardiff: Welsh Government.

71.

Wilcox

Pawson

(2013) UK Housing Review, Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.

72.

Williams

Mooney

(2008) Decentring social policy? Devolution and the discipline of social policy: A commentary. Journal of Social Policy 37(3): 489–507.

73.

Wolf M (2013) Britain’s austerity is indefensible. Financial Times, 12 March.