Transfer spending among English Premier League clubs has increased drastically since the inception of the league, often funded by extremely wealthy owners who began purchasing majority stakes in clubs. Using data from the Deloitte Annual Review of Football Finance, we allow for different tiers of football clubs representing the haves and the have nots as well as a comparison between the first and second decades of the Premier League. Our finding that heightened spending has improved on-field performance only at the expense of hurting profitability is in line with win maximisation surmounting profit maximisation in today's Premier League.
AndreffW. (2011), ‘Some comparative economics of the organization of sports: competition and regulation in North American vs. European professional team sports leagues’, European Journal of Comparative Economics, 8, 1, pp. 3–27.
2.
BergE. van den (2011), The Valuation of Human Capital in the Football Player Transfer Market: An Investigation of Transfer Fees Paid and Received in the English Premier League, Master Thesis Financial Economics, Erasmus School of Economics, Netherlands.
3.
BorooahV.K.ManganJ. (2012), ‘Measuring competitive balance in sports using generalized entropy with an application to English premier league football’, Applied Economics, 44, 9, pp. 1093–102.
4.
BuraimoB.FrickB.HickfangM.SimmonsR. (2015), ‘The economics of long-term contracts in the footballers’ labour market’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 62, 1, pp. 8–24.
5.
BurdekinR.C.K. (2012), ‘Demand for attendance: price measurement’, in ShmanskeS. and KahaneL.H. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sports Economics: Volume 2; Economics Through Sports, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
6.
CarmichaelF.McHaleI.ThomasD. (2011), ‘Maintaining market position: team performance, revenue and wage expenditure in the English premier league’, Bulletin of Economic Research, 63, 4, pp. 464–97.
7.
Deloitte (1994–2014), Annual Review of Football Finance, various issues.
8.
DietlH.FranckE.GrossmanM.LangM. (2012), ‘Contest theory and its applications in sports’, in ShmanskeS. and KahaneL.H. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sports Economics: Volume 2; Economics Through Sports, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
9.
DobsonS.GoddardJ. (2011), The Economics of Football, second edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
10.
DownwardP. (2014), ‘English professional football’, in GoddardJ. and SloaneP. (eds), Handbook on the Economics of Professional Football, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar.
11.
FeddersenA.MaennigW. (2008), ‘The European perspective on team ownership, competitive balance, and event impacts’, in HumphreysB.R. and HowardD.R. (eds), The Business of Sports, volume 1, Westport, CT, Praeger.
12.
FeessE.MuehlheusserG. (2003), ‘Transfer fee regulations in European football’, European Economic Review, 47, 4, pp. 645–68.
13.
FranckE. (2014), ‘Financial fair play in European club football: what is it all about?’, International Journal of Sport Finance, 9, 3, pp. 193–217.
14.
FrickB. (2013), ‘Team wage bills and sporting performance: evidence from (major and minor) European football leagues’, in RodríguezP., KésenneS. and GarcíaJ. (eds), The Econometrics of Sport, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar.
15.
FrickB.SimmonsR. (2014), ‘The football players’ labour market after the Bosman ruling’, in GoddardJ. and SloaneP. (eds), Handbook on the Economics of Professional Football, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar.
16.
Garcia-del-BarrioP.SzymanskiS. (2009), ‘Goal! Profit maximization versus win maximization in soccer’, Review of Industrial Organization, 34, 1, pp. 45–68.
17.
GerrardB. (2006), ‘Analyzing the win-wage relationship in pro sports leagues: evidence from the FA premier league, 1997/98–2001/02’, in RodríguezP., KésenneS. and García,J. (eds), Sports Economics after Fifty Years: Essays in Honour of Simon Rottenberg, Oviedo, Spain, Universidad de Oviedo.
18.
HallS.SzymanskiS.ZimbalistA.S. (2002), ‘Testing causality between team performance and payroll: the cases of major league baseball and English soccer’, Journal of Sports Economics, 3, 2, pp. 149–68.
19.
HopeC. (2014), ‘Money buys you happiness! City, Chelsea and United top the net-spend charts and ultimately dominate the silverware … while trophyless Arsenal lie in 18th place’, Daily Mail, 7 February.
20.
House of Commons, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2013), Football Governance Follow-Up: Fourth Report of Session 2012–13, Volume 1 (HC 509), London, The Stationery Office Limited.
21.
KavanaghM. (2010), ‘Wage demands pose threat to premier league’, Financial Times, 8 June.
22.
Késenne,S. (2014), The Economic Theory of Professional Team Sports: An Analytical Treatment, second edition, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar.
23.
KuperS.SzymanskiS., (2014), Soccernomics: Why England Loses, Why Spain, Germany, and Brazil Win, and Why the U.S., Japan, Australia – and Even Iraq – Are Destined to Become the Kings of the World's Most Popular Sport, World Cup edition, New York, Nation Books.
24.
LeeY.H.FortR. (2012), ‘Competitive balance: time series lessons from the English premier league’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 59, 3, pp. 266–82.
25.
MurrayE.GibsonO. (2012), ‘Rangers on precipice as biggest club yet faces shocking bankruptcy’, The Guardian, 13 February.
26.
PeetersT.SzymanskiS. (2014), ‘Financial fair play in European football’, Economic Policy, 29, 78, pp. 343–90.
27.
SimmonsR.ForrestD. (2004), ‘Buying success: team performance and wage bills in U.S. and European sports leagues’, in FortR. and FizelJ. (eds), International Sports Economics Comparisons, Westport, CT, Greenwood Publishing Group.
28.
SloaneP.J. (1971), ‘The economics of professional football: the football club as a utility maximiser’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 18, 2, pp. 121–46.
29.
SzymanskiS. (2013), ‘Wages, transfers and the variation of team performance in the English premier league’, in RodríguezP., KésenneS. and García,J. (eds), The Econometrics of Sport, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar.
30.
SzymanskiS. (2014), ‘Fair is foul: a critical analysis of UEFA financial fair play’, International Journal of Sport Finance, 9, 3, pp. 218–29.
