This paper hinges on the distinction between “maximizing profit” and “making profit.” It recounts from Adam Smith the ethical basis for profit making, and observes in Augustin Cournot why the maximization assumption was introduced. Several introductory texts are examined to observe how profit maximization is presented. The veracity of the assumption is challenged by considering: owner/ managers who focus on utility rather than profit, corporate maximization of shareholder wealth, corporate managers who pursue personal benefits, and evidence of “corporate social responsibility.” Milton Friedman's 1970 New York Times Magazine essay, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” is used to support that the ethical justification for the market system does not rest on maximizing profit, and that individuals often have moral latitude to pursue non-pecuniary business goals alongside seeking profit. Teaching that all firms maximize profit poorly educates students concerning how many firms actually behave and it reinforces a pecuniary value.
BrealeyRichard, StewartMyers, and AlanMarcus. 2012. Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. 7th ed.NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
7.
CaseKarl E., FairRoy C., and OsterSharon M.2012. Principles of Economics. 10th ed.Boston: Prentice Hall.
8.
ConroyMichael E.2007. Branded! How the 'Certification Revolution' is Transforming Global Corporations. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
9.
CournotAugustin. 1971. Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, 1838. With an Essay, Cournot and Mathematical Economics and a Bibliography of Mathematical Economics. New York: A.M. Kelley.
10.
DanielsonMorris G., HeckJean L., and ShafferDavid R.2008. “Shareholder Theory - How Opponents and Proponents Both Get It Wrong.” Journal Of Applied Finance18(2): 62–66.
11.
DillardJennifer. 2008. “A Slaughterhouse Nightmare: Psychological Harm Suffered by Slaughterhouse Employees and the Possibility of Redress through Legal Reform.” Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy15(2): 391–408.
12.
EdlinAaron S., and StiglitzJoseph E.1995. “Discouraging Rivals: Managerial Rent-Seeking and Economic Inefficiencies.” American Economic Review85(5): 1301–1312.
13.
EkelundRobert B.Jr, RobertF. Hébert. 1990. A History of Economic Theory and Method. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
14.
FisherIrving. 1898. “Cournot and Mathematical Economics.” Quarterly Journal Of Economics12(2): 119–138.
15.
FriedmanMilton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
FriedmanMilton. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.” New York Times Magazine, September13, pp. 32–33, 122, 126.
17.
GarrigaElisabet, and DomènecMelé. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory.” Journal Of Business Ethics53(1/2): 51–71.
18.
GoodsteinEban S.2011. Economics and the Environment. 6th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
19.
GreenhouseSteven. 2004. “Workers Assail Night Lock-Ins By WalMart.” New York Times, January18, pp. 1.
20.
GreenhouseSteven and JimYardley. 2012. “As Walmart Makes Safety Vows, It's Seen as Obstacle to Change.” New York Times, December29, pp. 1.
21.
KitzmuellerMarkus, and JayShimshack. 2012. “Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal Of Economic Literature50(1): 51–84.
22.
KrugmanPaul and RobinWells. 2013. Economics. 3rd ed. New York: Worth Publishers.
MargolisJoshua D., HillaryAnger Elfenbein and WalshJames P.2009. “Does it Pay to Be Good … And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance.” Social Science Review Network. Retrieved April20, 2013 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1866371).
25.
MishelLawrence and NatalieSabadish. 2012. “CEO Pay and the Top 1%: How Executive Compensation and Financial-sector Pay Have Fueled Income Inequality.” Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved March25, 2013. (http://www.epi.org/publication/ib331-ceo-pay-top-1-percent/).
26.
MontesLeonidas. 2003. “Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stages of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought25(1): 63–90.
27.
O'TooleJames, and DavidVogel. 2011. “Two and a Half Cheers for Conscious Capitalism.” California Management Review53(3): 60–76.
ReinhardtForest L., StavinsRobert N., and RichardH. K. Vietor. 2008. “Corporate Social Responsibility through an Economic Lens.” Review Of Environmental Economics And Policy2(2): 219–239.
30.
SchendlerAuden., 2009. Getting Green Done: Hard Truths from the Front Lines of the Sustainability Revolution. New York: PublicAffairs.
31.
SmithAdam. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32.
SmithAdam, EdwinCannan, and MaxLerner. 1937. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library.
33.
StiglitzJoseph E.2012. The Price of Inequality. W. W. Norton & Company.
34.
StoneGerald W.2012. CoreEconomics. 2nd ed. New York: Worth Publishers.
35.
StrongMichael. 2009. Be the Solution: How Entrepreneurs and Conscious Capitalists Can Solve All the World's Problems. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
U.S. Department of Commerce. United States Census Bureau. 2012. “Statistics about Business Size (including Small Business) from the U.S. Census Bureau.” Washington, DC. Retrieved March10, 2013 (http://www.census.gov/econ/smallbus.html#Nonemployers).
