This paper examines the death penalty through a public health framework, analysing its systemic impacts on individual and community well-being. Drawing on recent legislative changes in Malaysia, including the 2023 abolition of mandatory capital punishment, the study identifies three critical pathways through which the death penalty threatens public health: prolonged confinement of death row inmates, miscarriages of justice, and punitive drug policies. The research highlights how capital punishment creates trauma that extends beyond death row prisoners and affects families, prison staff, legal professionals, and communities. It emphasises the death penalty's disproportionate impact on marginalised groups, including women, sexual minorities, and individuals with disabilities, who face compounded discrimination in the judicial system. The paper concludes that abolishing the death penalty is not merely a legal imperative but a public health necessity, recommending a shift toward evidence-based, health-centred approaches that prioritise rehabilitation, harm reduction, and restorative justice.
Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 14. The right to the highest attainable standard of health (article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). Vol. Twenty-sec. Geneva; 2000.
2.
BeckEAdcockCFBantimbaA. A public health case for the abolition of the death penalty. In: RicciardelliLA (ed.) Social work, criminal justice, and the death penalty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2020, pp.117–130. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190937232.003.0010.
3.
MagruderKMMcLaughlinKAElmore BorbonDL. Trauma is a public health issue. Eur J Psychotraumatol2017; 8: 1375338.
4.
Amnesty International. Amnesty International global report: death sentences and executions 2023. May 2024; 2024.
5.
GirelliGJofréMAjengL. The death penalty for drug offences: global overview 2024. London: Harm Reduction International, 2025.
6.
KananatuT. Framing death penalty politics in Malaysia. Int J Crime, Justice Soc Democr2022; 11: 57–66.
7.
IsmailSJaafarN. Drug smuggling in Malaysia-our recent case files. Malaysian J Forensic Sci2015; 5: 44–47.
8.
QuraishiM. Case study 3: the death penalty in Malaysia. In: Towards a Malaysian criminology: conflict, censure and compromise. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2020, pp.141–154.
DhillonGMohammadNMiinNY. Capital punishment in Malaysia and globally: a tool for justice or a weapon against humanity. Leg Netw Ser2012; 1: 1–23.
12.
LeeSLDhillonG. The death sentence in Malaysia: a socio-legal review. In: 9th SWS International Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES - ISCSS 2022. 2022.
13.
Wu Kai-MingJ. Challenges to the Constitutionality of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Malaysia. Soc Sci Lang Lit (A Cross Sect Artic Discuss Eval Publ 2021), ed Dr Donipati Sumalatha. 2021.
14.
GirelliG. ‘Alternative facts’: public opinion surveys on the death penalty for drug offences in selected Asian countries. Int J Drug Policy2021; 92: 103155.
15.
PetcharamesreeSBoonlongRBreenD. ASEAN and the death penalty: theoretical and legal views and a pathway to abolition. In: Unpacking the death penalty in ASEAN. Springer Singapore, 2023, pp.157–177.
HoodR. The death penalty in Malaysia: public opinion on the mandatory death penalty for drug trafficking, murder and firearms offences. Death Penalty Project. London. Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford & The Bar Council of Malaysia; 2013.
22.
BeckEAdcockCFBantimbaA. Public health case for the abolition of the death penalty [internet]. In: RicciardelliLA (eds) Social work, criminal justice, and the death penalty. Oxford University Press, 2020, pp.0. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190937232.003.0010.
23.
LongWC. The Death Penalty as a Public Health Problem. In: Šimonovíc I, editor. The ‘Hidden’ Third Parties as Victims [Internet]. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Right; 2016. pp. 91–99. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/human-rights-new-york.
24.
WeisbuchJB. The public health effects of the death penalty. J Public Health Policy [Internet]1984 Apr 25; 5: 305–311. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3342155.
25.
WelshJ. The death penalty as a public health issue. Eur J Public Health2000; 10: 2–3.
26.
SchweizerJ. Racial disparity in capital punishment and its impact on family members of capital defendants. J Evid Based Soc Work2013; 10: 91–99.
BloomSLReichertM. Bearing witness: violence and collective responsibility. New York: Routledge, 2014.
29.
King JrML.Letter from Birmingham jail. In: Why we can't wait. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
30.
GilliganJ. Shame, guilt, and violence. Soc Res An Int Q2003; 70: 1149–1180.
31.
VelottiPElisonJGarofaloC. Shame and aggression: different trajectories and implications. Aggress Violent Behav2014; 19: 454–461.
32.
The Lancet. The death penalty: a breach of human rights and ethics of care. Lancet (London, England)2023; 401: 1629.
33.
CunninghamMDVigenMP. Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: a critical review of the literature. Behav Sci Law2002; 20: 191–210.
34.
PeelD. Clutching at life, waiting to die: the experience of death row incarceration. W Criminol Rev2013; 14: 61.
35.
United Nations Human Rights Council. Report of the Human Rights Council on the Death Penalty and Human Rights Violations, A/HRC/36/27, para. 3. 2017.
36.
United Nations General Assembly. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, A/77/150. 2022.
37.
ChessmanC. Cell 2455, death row: a condemned man’s own story. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2009.
38.
JohnsonR. Death work: a study of the modern execution process. United States: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., 1990.
39.
Tidball-BinzM. Medico-legal death investigations (Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; A/HRC/50/34). Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Council, 2022.
40.
OsofskyMJOsofskyHJ. The psychological experience of security officers who work with executions. Psychiatry Interpers Biol Process2002; 65: 358–370.
41.
LongWC. Trauma therapy for death row families. J Trauma Dissociation2011; 12: 482–494.
42.
GrossSR. Lost lives: miscarriages of justice in capital cases. Law Contemp Probs1998; 61: 125.
43.
WesterveltSDCookKJ. Coping with innocence after death row. Contexts2008; 7: 32–37.
44.
BlackerbyJC. Life after death row: preventing wrongful capital convictions and restoring innocence after exoneration. Vand L Rev2003; 56: 1179.
45.
BrooksSKGreenbergN. Psychological impact of being wrongfully accused of criminal offences: a systematic literature review. Med Sci Law2021; 61: 44–54.
46.
Da-YuanHAN. Preventing wrongful death penalty conviction by constitutional control: based on an analysis of 10 misjudged death penalty cases. J Renmin Univ China2013; 27: 10.
47.
WerbDKerrTNosykB, et al.The temporal relationship between drug supply indicators: an audit of international government surveillance systems. BMJ Open2013; 3: e003077.
48.
DruckerE. A plague of prisons: The epidemiology of mass incarceration in America. New York: The New Press, 2013.
49.
RehmJTaylorBRoomR. Global burden of disease from alcohol, illicit drugs and tobacco. Drug Alcohol Rev2006; 25: 503–513.
50.
DegenhardtLMathersBGuarinieriM, et al.Meth/amphetamine use and associated HIV: implications for global policy and public health. Int J Drug Policy2010; 21: 347–358.
51.
ReidGKamarulzamanASranSK. Malaysia and harm reduction: the challenges and responses. Int J Drug Policy2007; 18: 136–140.
52.
KamarulzamanAMcBrayerJL. Compulsory drug detention centers in East and Southeast Asia. Int J Drug Policy2015; 26: S33–S37.
53.
CseteJKamarulzamanAKazatchkineM, et al.Public health and international drug policy. Lancet2016; 387: 1427–1480.
54.
HoyleCGirelliG. The Death Penalty for Drug Offences: Foreign Nationals. Briefing Paper, Harm Reduction International. 2019.
55.
AhaltCBinswangerIASteinmanM, et al.Confined to ignorance: the absence of prisoner information from nationally representative health data sets. J Gen Intern Med2012; 27: 160–166.
56.
Global Commission on Drug Policy. The world drug perception problem: countering prejudices about people who use drugs. Global Commission on Drug Policy Geneva; 2017.
57.
HughesCEStevensA. What can we learn from the Portuguese decriminalization of illicit drugs?Br J Criminol2010; 50: 999–1022.
van den BerghBJGathererAFraserA, et al.Imprisonment and women’s health: concerns about gender sensitivity, human rights and public health. Bull World Health Organ2011; 89: 689–694.
61.
HarnerHMRileyS. The impact of incarceration on women’s mental health: responses from women in a maximum-security prison. Qual Health Res2013; 23: 26–42.
62.
SingerMIBusseyJSongL-Y, et al.The psychosocial issues of women serving time in jail. Soc Work1995; 40: 103–113.
63.
CalvoEdM. Imprisonment of women. The penitentiary punishment of social exclusion and gender inequality. Zerb Gizarte Zerb Aldizkaria= Rev Serv Soc2014; 56: 75–86.
64.
JonesSJBeckE. Disenfranchised grief and nonfinite loss as experienced by the families of death row inmates. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying2007; 54: 281–299.
65.
BruceEJSchultzCL. Nonfinite loss and grief: a psychoeducational approach. USA: Paul H Brookes Publishing, 2001.
66.
LourtauDHickeySP. Judged for more than her crime: a global overview of women facing the death penalty. New York: Cornell University, 2018.
67.
HarryL. Rethinking the relationship between women, crime and economic factors: the case-study of women sentenced to death for drug trafficking in Malaysia. Laws2021; 10: 9.
68.
RazaliSFisherJKirkmanM. “Nobody came to help”: interviews with women convicted of filicide in Malaysia. Arch Womens Ment Health2019; 22: 151–158.
69.
World Coalition Against The Death Penalty. Joint statement for the 20th anniversary of the World Day Against the Death Penalty on the Death Penalty and the Human Rights of Women and LGBTQIA+ people [Internet]. WCADP. 2022 [cited 2024 May 24]. Available from: https://worldcoalition.org/2022/10/10/world-day-20th-anniversary-joint-statement/
70.
SatoMAlexanderC. State-sanctioned killing of sexual minorities: looking beyond the death penalty. Monash University Australia, 2021.
71.
CavagniniL. What justice can be: looking at the imprisonment experiences of trans and gender non-conforming inmates through queer theory, and the role of social workers in abolition practices. USA: Appalachian State University, 2021.
72.
LiA. To what extent does society need to support LGBTQ+ prisoners in American prison housing? In: 2021 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2021). Atlantis Press; 2021, pp. 572–575.
73.
RapaportE. The death penalty and gender discrimination. Law Soc Rev1991; 25(2): 367–383.
74.
CainCMEllisonJM. The pains of imprisonment through a rainbow lens: an overview of the marginalized conditions of incarceration for LGBTQ persons. In: Handbook on inequalities in sentencing and corrections among marginalized populations. New York, NY: Routledge, 2022, pp.206–222.
75.
DrakeDS. Incarceration of LGBTQ people. In: The Routledge handbook of LGBTQIA administration and policy. USA: Routledge, 2018, pp.314–334.
76.
KosenkoKANelsonEA. Identifying and ameliorating lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health disparities in the criminal justice system. Am J Public Health2018; 108: 970.
77.
MalaysiaKini. Court upholds Thai sex worker’s death sentence for trafficking meth [Internet]. MalaysiaKini (27 December 2017). 2017 [cited 2023 Feb 15]. Available from https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/406678
78.
BrightSB. Imposition of the death penalty upon the poor, racial minorities, the intellectually disabled and the mentally ill. Mov Aw from Death Penal Arguments, Trends Perspect Ed by Ivan Šimonović, UN Off High Comm Hum Rights. 2014; 99–113.
79.
MaloneL. Too ill to be killed: mental and physical competency to be executed pursuant to the death penalty. Tex Tech L Rev2018; 51: 147.
