Forensic facial reconstruction is a useful tool to assist the public in recognizing human remains, leading to positive forensic investigation outcomes. To reproduce a virtual face, facial soft tissue thickness is one of the major guidelines to reach the accuracy and reliability for three-dimensional computerized facial reconstruction, a method that is making a significant contribution to improving forensic investigation and identification. This study aimed to develop a facial soft tissue thickness dataset for a Thai population, and test its reliability in the context of facial reconstruction. Three-dimensional facial reconstruction was conducted on four skulls (2 males and 2 females, with ages ranging between 51 to 60 years). Two main tools of three-dimensional computer animation and modeling software—Blender and Autodesk Maya—were used to rebuild the three-dimensional virtual face. The three-dimensional coordinate (x, y, z) cutaneous landmarks on the mesh templates were aligned homologous to the facial soft tissue thickness markers on the three-dimensional skull model. The final three-dimensional virtual face was compared to the target frontal photograph using face pool comparison. Four three-dimensional virtual faces were matched at low to moderate levels, ranging from 30% to 70% accuracy. These results demonstrate that the facial soft tissue thickness database of a Thai population applied in this study could be useful for three-dimensional computerized facial reconstruction purposes.
WilkinsonC. Facial reconstruction--anatomical art or artistic anatomy?J Anat2010; 216: 235–250.
2.
DengQZhouMWuZ, et al.A regional method for craniofacial reconstruction based on coordinate adjustments and a new fusion strategy. Forensic Sci Int2016; 259: 19–31.
3.
De BuhanMNardoniC. A facial reconstruction method based on new mesh deformation techniques. Forensic Sci Res2018; 3: 256–273.
4.
FernandesCMSerra MdaCDa SilvaJV, et al.Tests of one Brazilian facial reconstruction method using three soft tissue depth sets and familiar assessors. Forensic Sci Int2012; 214: 211.e211–217.
5.
FernandesCMPereiraFDDa SilvaJV, et al.Is characterizing the digital forensic facial reconstruction with hair necessary? A familiar assessors’ analysis. Forensic Sci Int2013; 229: 164.e161–165.
6.
VerzéL. History of facial reconstruction. Acta Biomed2009; 80: 5–12.
ClaesPVandermeulenDDe GreefS, et al.Computerized craniofacial reconstruction: conceptual framework and review. Forensic Sci Int2010; 201: 138–145.
9.
StephanCNCapleJMGuyomarc’hP, et al.An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging. Forensic Sci Res2019; 4: 10–28.
10.
VanezisMVanezisP. Cranio-Facial reconstruction in forensic identification — historical development and a review of current practice. Med Sci Law2000; 40: 197–205.
11.
ShortLJKhambayBAyoubA, et al.Validation of a computer modelled forensic facial reconstruction technique using CT data from live subjects: a pilot study. Forensic Sci Int2014; 237: 147.e141–148.
12.
LeeWJWilkinsonCMHwangHS. An accuracy assessment of forensic computerized facial reconstruction employing cone-beam computed tomography from live subjects. J Forensic Sci2012; 57: 318–327.
13.
LeeWJWilkinsonCMHwangHS, et al.Correlation between average tissue depth data and quantitative accuracy of forensic craniofacial reconstructions measured by geometric surface comparison method. J Forensic Sci2015; 60: 572–580.
14.
MirandaGEWilkinsonCRoughleyM, et al.Assessment of accuracy and recognition of three-dimensional computerized forensic craniofacial reconstruction. PLoS One2018; 13: e0196770.
15.
RajapakseRNMadugallaAKAmarasingheIU, et al. Facial muscle anatomy based approach for forensic facial reconstruction in Sri Lanka. In: International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ed VidanapathiranaM), Colombo, Sri Lanka, 12–15 December 2012, pp. 27–35.
16.
Tedeschi-OliveiraSVMelaniRFHDe AlmeidaNH, et al.Facial soft tissue thickness of Brazilian adults. Forensic Sci Int2009; 193: 127.e121–127.
17.
De AlmeidaNHMichel-CrosatoEDe PaivaLA, et al.Facial soft tissue thickness in the Brazilian population: new reference data and anatomical landmarks. Forensic Sci Int2013; 231: 404.e401–407.
18.
HwangHSParkMKLeeWJ, et al.Facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction in Korean adults. J Forensic Sci2012; 57: 1442–1447.
19.
Guyomarc’hPSantosFDutaillyB, et al.Facial soft tissue depths in French adults: variability, specificity and estimation. Forensic Sci Int2013; 231: 411.e1–10.
20.
ThiemannNKeilVRoyU. In vivo facial soft tissue depths of a modern adult population from Germany. Int J Legal Med2017; 131: 1455–1488.
DomarackiMStephanCN. Facial soft tissue thicknesses in Australian adult cadavers. J Forensic Sci2006; 51: 5–10.
23.
StephanCNPreislerR. In vivo facial soft tissue thicknesses of adult Australians. Forensic Sci Int2018; 282: 220.e1–12.
24.
SandaminiHJayawardenaABatuwitageL, et al.Facial soft tissue thickness trends for selected age groups of Sri Lankan adult population. Forensic Sci Int2018; 293: 102.e101–111.
25.
ChanWNListiGAManheinMH. In vivo facial tissue depth study of Chinese-American adults in New York city. J Forensic Sci2011; 56: 350–358.
26.
DongYHuangL, FengZ,et al.Influence of sex and body mass index on facial soft tissue thickness measurements of the northern Chinese adult population. Forensic Sci Int2012; 222: 396.e391–397.
27.
JiaLQiB, YangJ,et al.Ultrasonic measurement of facial tissue depth in a northern Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int2016; 259: 247.e241–246.
28.
De GreefSClaesP, VandermeulenD,et al.Large-scale in-vivo caucasian facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int2006; 159: S126–146.
29.
Guyomarc’hPDutaillyBChartonJ, et al.Anthropological facial approximation in three dimensions (AFA3D): computer-assisted estimation of the facial morphology using geometric morphometrics. J Forensic Sci2014; 59: 1502–1516.
30.
StephanCNPreislerRBulutO, et al.Turning the tables of sex distinction in craniofacial identification: why females possess thicker facial soft tissues than males, not vice versa.Am J Phys Anthropol2016; 161: 283–295.
31.
CapleJStephanCN. A standardized nomenclature for craniofacial and facial anthropometry. Int J Legal Med2016; 130: 863–879.
32.
StephanCNMeikleBFreudensteinN, et al. Facial soft tissue thicknesses in craniofacial identification: data collection protocols and associated measurement errors. Forensic Sci Int2019; 304: 109965.
33.
MeikleBStephanCN. B-mode ultrasound measurement of facial soft tissue thickness for craniofacial identification: a standardized approach. J Forensic Sci2020; 65: 939–947.
34.
ThitiorulSPrapayasatokSNa LampangS, et al.Nose width and mouth width predictions in a Thai population using cone-beam computed tomography data. Aust J Forensic Sci2019; 53: 1–10.
35.
ThitiorulSMahakkanukrauhPPrasitwattanasereeS, et al.Three-Dimensional prediction of the nose for facial approximation in a Thai population. J Forensic Sci2020; 65: 707–714.
StephanCNArthurRS. Assessing facial approximation accuracy: how do resemblance ratings of disparate faces compare to recognition tests?Forensic Sci Int2006; 159: S159–S163.
42.
StephanCNCicoliniJ. Measuring the accuracy of facial approximations: a comparative study of resemblance rating and face array methods. J Forensic Sci2008; 53: 58–64.
43.
LeeWJWilkinsonCM. The unfamiliar face effect on forensic craniofacial reconstruction and recognition. Forensic Sci Int2016; 269: 21–30.
44.
SforzaCGrandiGDe MenezesM, et al.Age- and sex-related changes in the normal human external nose. Forensic Sci Int2011; 204: 205.e201–209.
45.
ChenFChenYYuY, et al.Age and sex related measurement of craniofacial soft tissue thickness and nasal profile in the Chinese population. Forensic Sci Int2011; 212: 272.e271–276.
46.
AlbertAMRicanekKJrPattersonE.A review of the literature on the aging adult skull and face: implications for forensic science research and applications. Forensic Sci Int2007; 172: 1–9.
47.
De DonnoASabloneSLaurettiC, et al.Facial approximation: soft tissue thickness values for caucasian males using cone beam computer tomography. Leg Med (Tokyo)2019; 37: 49–53.
48.
StephanCN. 2018 Tallied facial soft tissue thicknesses for adults and sub-adults. Forensic Sci Int2017; 280: 113–123.
49.
HoultonTMRJoosteNSteynM. Testing regression and mean model approaches to facial soft-tissue thickness estimation. Med Sci Law2021; 61: 170–179.
50.
GietzenTBrylkaRAchenbachJ, et al.A method for automatic forensic facial reconstruction based on dense statistics of soft tissue thickness. PLoS One2019; 14: e0210257.
