In this paper I argue that intonation is best analyzed as an overt marking of the focus structure (f-structure) of a sentence. The linguistic level of fstructure in which both topic and focus are identified provides the link between context, interpretation, syntax, and intonation. I further show that the view that grammar is f-structure driven modifies the set of questions one must pose in analyzing the function of various sign language correlates of prosody and intonation.
Bolinger, D. (1972). Accent is predictable (if you're a mind-reader) . Language, 48, 633-644.
2.
Bolinger, D. (1982). Facial expressions. Luncheon talk atStanford University.
3.
Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (183-216) . Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press.
4.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program (. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 239-298.
6.
Cohen, A., & Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997). Bare plurals and focus structure. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium (pp.31-36).
7.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1979). Discourse constraints on dative movement. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 441-467). New York: Academic Press.
8.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997). The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Erteschik-Shir, N., & Lappin, S. (1987).Dominance and modularity. Linguistics , 25(4), 671-685.
10.
Erteschik-Shir, N., & Rapoport, T. (1997). Verbal projection. In G. Matos, & M. Miguel (Eds.), On interfaces in linguistic theory: Selected papers from the International Conference on Interfaces in Linguistics, Oporto, November, 1995 (pp. 129-148). Lisboa: APL/Edições Colibri.
11.
Erteschik-Shir, N., & Rapoport, T.(in preparation). Rolling aspect. Ben-Gurion University , ms.
12.
Gussenhoven, C. (1983). Focus, mode, and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 377-417.
13.
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts .
14.
Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
Jacobs, J. (1991).Focus ambiguities. Journal of Semantics , 8, 1-36.
16.
Jacobs, J. (1994). Informational autonomy. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (Eds.), Focus and natural language processing, Vol. 1: Intonation and syntax. Working Papers of the Institute for Logic and Linguistics (pp. 113-132). IBM.
17.
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
18.
Ladd, D.R. (1980). The structure of intonational meaning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Miyagawa, S. (1997). Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(1), 1-26.
22.
Nespor, M., & Sandler W. (1999) (this issue). Prosody in Israeli Sign Language . Language and Speech, 42(2&3), 143-176
23.
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht : Foris.
24.
Partee, B.H. (1992). Topic, focus, and quantification. Proceedings of the 1991 SALT Conference (pp. 159-187). Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, Cornell University.
25.
Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In J. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. L. Pollack (Eds.), Intention and communication (pp. 271-312). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53-94.
27.
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Selkirk, E. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing . In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp.550-569). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
29.
Steedman, M. (1991). Structure and intonation. Language , 67(2), 260-296.
30.
Strawson, P.F. (1964). Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria, 30, 86-99. Reprinted in D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.) (1971). Semantics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Vallduví, E. (1992). The informational component. New York: Garland.
32.
Wilbur, R.B. (1996). Prosodic structure of American Sign Language. Ms. Purdue University.
33.
Wilbur, R., & Patschke, C.G. (1998). Body leans and the marking of contrast in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics , 30, 275-303.
34.
Zubizarreta, M.L. (1998). Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
