In a study comparing the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language, the project's deaf researchers were struck by the difference in the production of the signs by the two groups of signers. Specifically, they felt that the early learners' signing was easier to watch and to understand because it was somehow more “rhythmic.” In order to discover reasons for this impression, analyses were made of temporal aspects of the production of signs which might function as prosodic elements in this visual-corporal language. Two kinds of rhythmic patterning were found in the spontaneous signed narratives which formed the data of the original study. The first is temporal balancing of syntactic phrases in which the final phrase is produced with approximately the same duration as that of the preceding phrase in certain kinds of discourse. This kind of temporal balancing was found in the data of both the early and late learners of the language. The second rhythmic patterning found in this study is a regular side to side movement of the torso which phonetically marks larger chunks of some types of discourse. This marking is used consistently by the early learners but not by the late learners, who tend rather to transfer prosodic markers from their first language, German, to their sign language production.
Allen, G.D., Wilbur, R., & Schick, B. (1991). Aspects of rhythm in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 72, 297-320.
2.
Bahan, B., & Supalla, S. (1995). Line segmentation and narrative structure: A study of eyegaze behavior in American Sign Language. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture and space. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
Baker, C., & Padden, C. (1978). Focusing on the nonmanual components of American Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Bos, H. (1994). Pronoun copy in sign language of the Netherlands . Presentation at the 4th European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich, September, 1994, ms.
5.
Boyes Braem, P. (1995). Eine Untersuchung über den Einfluss des Erwerbsalters auf die in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz verwendeten Formen von Gebärdensprache: Ein Überblick zu einem vom Schweizerischen Nationalfonds unterstützten Projekt des Forschungszentrums für Gebärdensprache, Basel, 1991-1995. [A Study of the effect of age of acquisition on the forms of sign language used in German Switzerland.]Zürich: Verein zur Unterstützung der Gebärdensprache der Gehörlosen.
6.
Boyes Braem, P. (1999). Functions of the mouthing component in Swiss German Sign Language. In D. Brentari (Ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: Grammatical constraints and social contexts . Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
7.
Bull, P. (1990). What does gesture add to the spoken word. In H. Barlow, C. Blakemore, & M. WestonSmith (Eds.), Images and understanding.Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Buxton, H. (1983). Temporal Predictability in the Perception of English Speech. In A. Coulter & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: models and measurements. Berlin: Springer.
9.
Condon, W.S. (1988). An analysis of behavior organization. Sign Language Studies, 58, 55-88.
10.
Coulter, G.R. (1990). Emphatic stress in ASL. In S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (Eds.),Theoretical issues in sign language research, 1 : Linguistics . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Coulter, G.R. (1993). Phrase-level prosody in ASL. In G. R. Coulter (Ed.), Phonetics and phonology: Current issues in ASL phonology (pp. 263-272). San Diego: Academic Press.
12.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English speech rhythm. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company.
13.
Covington, V.C. (1973). Features of stress in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 2, 39 - 58.
14.
Cutler, A. (1994).Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions. Lingua, 92 (1-4), 81-104.
15.
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993). Space in Danish Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum.
16.
Grosjean, F. (1979). A study of timing in a manual and a spoken language: American Sign Language and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8 (4), 379-405.
17.
Grosjean, F. (1983). How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language. Linguistics, 21, 501-529.
18.
Grosjean, F. (1997). Processing mixed language: Issues, findings, and models. In A. M. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 225-254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
Grosjean, F. (1999). The bilingual's language modes. In J. L. Nicol & T. D. Langendoen (Eds.), Language processing in the bilingual . Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
Hayes, B. (1993). Against movement: Comments on Liddell's article . In G. R. Coulter (Ed.), Phonetics and phonology : Current issues in ASL phonology (pp. 213-226). San Diego: Academic Press.
21.
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
22.
Ikoma, M. (1993). Stress-timed rhythm in German speech: A study in acoustic phonetics. Sophia Linguistica, 33, 197-216.
23.
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language. Cognition, 39, 215-258.
24.
Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech . In A.W. Seigman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication . Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
25.
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction. Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Kingston, J. (1999)(this issue). Extrapolating from spoken to signed prosody via laboratory phonology. Language and Speech, 42(2&3), 251-281.
27.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, U.K.: MIT Press.
28.
Liddell, S.K. (1977). Nonmanual signals in American Sign Language: A many layered system. In William C. Stokoe (Ed.), Proceedings of the first national symposium on sign language research and teaching (pp. 193-228). Washington, D. C.: National Association of the Deaf.
29.
Liddell, S.K. (1978). Non manual signals and relative clauses in ASL . In Patricia Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press.
30.
Liddell, S.K. (1980). American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
31.
Liddell, S.K., & Johnson, R.E. (1989). American Sign Language: The phonological base . Sign Language Studies, 64, 195-277.
32.
Mayberry, R. (1993). First language acquisition after childhood differs from second language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1258-1270.
33.
McDonald, B. (1982). Aspects of the ASL predicate system. Unpub. Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of New York at Buffalo.
34.
Miller, C. (1994a). Simultaneous constructions and complex signs in Quebec Sign Language. In I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman, & M. Brennan (Eds.), Perspectives on sign language structure (pp. 131-147). Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association .
35.
Miller, C. (1994b). Simultaneous constructionsin Quebec Sign Language . In M. Brennan & G. Turner (Eds.), Word-order issues in sign language. Working papers (pp. 89-112). Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
36.
Miller, C. (1997). Phonologie de la langue des signes quèbècoise. Structure simultanèe et ax temporel. Doctoral dissertation. Université du Quèbec. Montrèal.
37.
Nespor, M., & Sandler, W. (1999) (this issue). Prosody in Israeli sign language . Language and Speech, 42(2&3), 143-176.
38.
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht : Foris.
39.
Perlmutter, D. (1992). Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 407-442.
40.
Perlmutter, D. (1993). Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. In G. R. Coulter (Ed.), Phonetics and phonology: Current issues in ASL phonology (pp. 227-259). San Diego: Academic Press.
41.
Sandler, W. (1990). Temporal aspects and ASL phonology. In S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, 1. Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Sandler, W. (1999). Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language . In T.A. Hael & U. Kleinhenz (Eds.), Studies on the phonological word (pp. 223-254). Amsterdam: Benjamins .
43.
Scott, D.R., Isard, S.D., & Boysson-Bardies, B. de (1985). Perceptual isochrony in English and French. Journal of Phonetics, 13(2), 155- 162.
44.
Srensen, R.K. (1980). Rhythms, "intonation," and sentence markers in Danish Sign Language. In I. Ahlgren & B. Bergman (Eds.), Papers from the First International Symposium on Sign Language Research (pp. 283-291). Stockholm: The Swedish National Association of the Deaf.
45.
Supalla, T. (1986). The classifier system in American Sign Language . In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization. (pp. 181-214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46.
Tweney, R.D., Liddell, S.K., & Bellugi, U. (1983). The perception of grammatical boundaries in sign language. Discourse Processes, 6, 295-304.
47.
Uyechi, L. (1994). The geometry of visual phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
48.
Wallin, L. (1996). Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University.
49.
Wenk, B.J. (1985). Speech rhythms in second language acquisition . Language and Speech, 28(2), 157 - 176.
50.
Wilbur, R., & Nolen, S. (1986). The duration of syllables in American Sign Language . Language and Speech, 29, 263-280.
51.
Wilbur, R., & Schick, B. (1987). The effects of linguistic stress on aSL signs . Language and Speech30, 301-324.
52.
Wilbur, R. (1990). An experimental investigation of stressed sign production. International Journal of Sign Linguistics, 1 (1), 41-59.
53.
Wilbur, R. (1994a). Eyeblinks and ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies, 84, 221-240.
54.
Wilbur, R. (1994b). Stress, focus, and extrametricality in ASL. Presentation to the Annual Meeting of theLinguistic Society of America , Boston, ms.
55.
Wilbur, R. (1999)(this issue). Stress in ASL: Empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech, 42(2&3), 229-250.
