Syllables in spoken languages have been argued to have an internal structure which may cluster the consonants and vowels into subgroups. The most commonly used subgroups are the Onset (initial consonants) and Rhyme (vowel and remaining consonants), with the further possibility of dividing the Rhyme into Nucleus (the vowel and any on- or off-glides) and the Coda (the final consonants). Although linguistic debate continues about the exact formulation of such syllable models, the evidence is clear that listeners identify rhythmic beats at a particular point inside the syllable, namely at the release of the initial consonants into the following linguistically stressed vowels (referred to as the syllable peak, assumed to be part of the Nucleus). To determine whether such loci would be identified for syllables in American Sign Language, deaf native signers, hearing native signers, and hearing subjects unfamiliar with sign language were asked to tap to videotaped signed stimuli. Analysis of the tap locations in signed syllables revealed a relatively flat distribution across the syllable for all three groups and for individual subjects. The absence of syllable peak perception is discussed in relation to the motoric characteristics of sign production.
Allen, G.D. (1972). The location of rhythmic stress beats in English speech. Parts I and II. Language and Speech, 15, 72–100, 179–195.
2.
Allen, G.D., Wilbur, R., and Schick, B. (in press). Aspects of rhythm in ASL. Sign Language Studies.
3.
Battison, R. (1978). Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language.Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press, Inc.
4.
Brentari, D. (1990). Underspecification in American Sign Language phonology. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Boston, May.
5.
Brentari, D., and Goldsmith, J. (in press). Secondary licensing and the non-dominant hand in ASL phonology. In G. Coulter (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Buxton, H. (1983). Temporal predictability in the perception of English speech. In A. Cutler and D. Ladd (eds.), Prosody: Models and Measurements (pp. 111–121). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7.
Chinchor, N. (1981). Numeral Incorporation in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Brown University.
8.
Clements, G.N., and Keyser, S.J. (1983). CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No. 9. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Corina, D. (in press). Reassessing the role of sonority in syllable structure: Evidence from a visual gestural language. Chicago Linguistic Society Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology, 26.
10.
Coulter, G. (1982). On the nature of ASL as a monosyllabic language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting, Linguistic Society of America, San Diego.
11.
Coulter, G. (1990). Emphatic stress in ASL. In S. Fischer and P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research: Linguistics (pp. 109–126). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Edmondson, W. (1986). Autosegmental phonology: The syllable and the sign. In B. Tervoort (ed.), Signs of Life: Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research (pp. 79–94). Institute of General Linguistics of the University of Amsterdam, 50.
13.
Edmondson, W. (1990). Segments in signed languages: Do they exist and does it matter? In W. Edmondson and F. Karlsson (eds.), SLR '87: Sign Language Research (pp. 66–74). Hamburg: SIGNUM Press.
14.
Fowler, C.A. (1979). “Perceptual centers” in speech production and perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 375–388.
15.
Fowler, C.A., Whalen, D.H., and Cooper, A.M. (1988). Perceived timing is produced timing: A reply to Howell. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 94–98.
16.
Fraisse, P. (1963). The Psychology of Time.New York: Harper & Row.
17.
Frishberg, N. (1978). The case of the missing length. Communication and Cognition, 11, 57–68.
18.
Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology: A New Synthesis.London: Basil Blackwell.
19.
Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253–306.
20.
Howell, P. (1988a). Prediction of P-center location from the distribution of energy in the amplitude envelope: I. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 90–93.
21.
Howell, P. (1988b). Prediction of P-center location from the distribution of energy in the amplitude envelope: II. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 99.
22.
Kantor, R. (1978). Identifying native and non-native signers. Communication and Cognition, 11, 39–55.
23.
Kegl, J., and Wilbur, R. (1976). When does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphology, and phonology vs. stylistic variation in American Sign Language. In S. Mufwene, C. Walker, and S. Steever (eds.), Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 376–396). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Klima, E., and Bellugi, U. (1979). The Signs of Language.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Liddell, S. (1978). An introduction to relative clauses in ASL. In P. Siple (ed.), Understanding Language through Sign Language Research (pp. 59–90). New York: Academic Press.
26.
Liddell, S. (1982). Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Presented at the Summer Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, College Park, MD.
27.
Liddell, S. (1984). THINK and BELIEVE: Sequentiality in American Sign Language signs. Language, 60, 372–399.
28.
Liddell, S. (1990). Structures for representing handshape and local movement at the phonemic level. In S. Fischer and P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research: Linguistics (pp. 37–66). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Liddell, S. (in press). Holds and positions: Comparing two models of segmentation in ASL. In G. Coulter (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
30.
Marcus, S. (1975). Perceptual Centres. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge.
31.
Morton, J., Marcus, S., and Frankish, C. (1976). Perceptual centres (P-centres). Psychological Review, 83, 405–408.
32.
Newkirk, D. (1981). The temporal segmentation of movement in American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies.
33.
Perlmutter, D. (1988). A moraic theory of American Sign Language syllable structure. Presented at the Gallaudet Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Washington, D.C.
34.
Perlmutter, D. (in press). The moraic theory and the typology of ASL syllable structure. In G. Coulter (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
35.
Poizner, H. (1983). Perception of movement in American Sign Language: Effects of linguistic structure and linguistic experience. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 215–231.
36.
Rapp, K. (1971). A study of syllable timing. Quarterly Status and Progress Report, Speech Transmission Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Part 1, 14–19.
37.
Sandler, W. (1986). The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 50, 1–28.
38.
Sandler, W. (1987). Sequentiality and Simultaneity in American Sign Language Phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
39.
Sandler, W. (1990). Temporal aspects and ASL phonology. In S. Fischer and P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (pp. 7–36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Sandler, W. (in press). Linearization of phonological tiers in ASL. In G. Coulter (ed), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
41.
Steriade, D. (1988). Review of Clements and Keyser ‘CV Phonology’. Language, 64, 118–129.
42.
Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers No. 8.
43.
Wilbur, R. (1979). American Sign Language and Sign Systems.Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
44.
Wilbur, R. (1987). American Sign Language: Linguistic and Applied Dimensions.San Diego: College-Hill Press.
45.
Wilbur, R. (1990a). An experimental investigation of stressed sign production. International Journal of Sign Linguistics, 1, 41–59.
46.
Wilbur, R. (1990b). Intonation and focus in American Sign Language. In B. Josephs (ed.), Intonation and Focus: ESCOL 1990.Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
47.
Wilbur, R. (1990c). Why syllables? What the notion means for ASL research. In S. Fischer and P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (pp. 81–108). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Wilbur, R. (in press). Segments and syllables in American Sign Language phonology. In G. Coulter (ed.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
49.
Wilbur, R., and Nolen, S. (1986). The duration of syllables in American Sign Language. Language and Speech, 29, 263–280.
50.
Wilbur, R., and Schick, B. (1987). The effects of linguistic stress on ASL signs. Language and Speech, 30, 301–323.
51.
Wilcox, S. (1988). The phonetics of fingerspelling: Kinematic, temporal, and dynamic aspects of fingerspelling production. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.
