Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This research investigated listeners' ability to recognize adjacent vowels and consonants that are conveyed in part by a common temporal cue – vowel duration. The stimuli consisted of a large sample of natural speech containing nonsense syllables made by combining four vowels that differed in inherent duration (/i/, /ε/, /i/, /e/) with two syllable-final consonants that differed in phonological voicing (/z/ and /s/), a distinction that is partially cued by vowel duration. Experiment 1 examined the effect of vowel identity, fricative identity, and contextual factors on vowel duration, voiced-frication duration, and voiceless-frication duration in speech production, and the potential effectiveness of these durational measures as classification cues. In Experiment 2, listeners identified the syllables after they had been excised from sentential context. Accuracy in recognizing /s/ varied with the inherent duration of the preceding vowel, with the number of errors increasing with inherent vowel duration. This suggests that listeners did not sufficiently account for the effect of vowel identity when interpreting vowel duration as a cue to syllable-final voicing. In Experiment 3, listeners heard the syllables in sentential context. Accuracy improved, and no relation was found between inherent vowel duration and accuracy in recognizing /s/. This indicated that the sentential context of a syllable conveys information that is useful to listeners in correctly determining the segmental basis of the internal temporal structure of a syllable.

Keywords

vowel duration fricative voicing context effects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ainsworth, W.A. (1972). Duration as a cue in the recognition of synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 648–651.

Denes, P. (1955). Effect of duration on the perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 761–764.

Derr, M.A. , and Massaro, D.W. (1980). The contribution of vowel duration, Fo contour, and frication duration as cues to the /juz/-/jus/ distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 51–59.

Fowler, C.A. (1980). Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113–133.

Gordon, P.C. (1988). Induction of rate-dependent processing by coarse-grained aspects of speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 137–146.

Gordon, P.C. (1989). Context effects in recognizing syllable-final /z/ and /s/ in different phrasal positions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1698–1707.

Haggard, M. (1978). The devoicing of voiced fricatives. Journal of Phonetics, 6, 95–102.

Klatt, D.H. (1976). Linguistic use of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221.

Martin, J.G. (1970). On judging pauses in spontaneous speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 75–78.

10.

Mermelstein, P. (1978). On the relationship between vowel and consonant identification when cued by the same acoustic information. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 331–336.

11.

Miller, J.L. (1981). Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions. In P.D. Eimas and J.L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on the Study of Speech (pp. 39–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Miller, J.L. (1987). Rate-dependent processing in speech perception. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language (Vol. 3) (pp. 119–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

13.

Peterson, G.E. , and Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693–703.

14.

Port, R.F. , Al-Ani, S. , and Maeda, S. (1980). Temporal compensation and universal phonetics. Phonetica, 37, 235–252.

15.

Port, R.F. , Reilly, W.T. , and Maki, D.P. (1988). Use of syllable-scale timing to discriminate words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 265–273.

16.

Raphael, L.J. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristics of word-final consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1296–1303.

17.

Repp, B.H. , and Lin, H.-B. (1991). Effects of preceding context on the voice-onset-time category boundary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 289–302.

18.

Soli, S.D. (1982). Structure and duration of vowels together specify fricative voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 366–378.

19.

Summerfield, Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1074–1095.

20.

Verbrugge, R.R. , and Shankweiler, D.P. (1977). Prosodic information for vowel identity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, S39 (Abstract).

21.

Whalen, D.H. (1989). Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 284–292.

Disambiguation of Segmental Dependencies by Extended Phonetic Context

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References