Durations of American English Vowels by Native and Non-native Speakers: Acoustic Analyses and Perceptual Effects

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine durations of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers and the effects of vowel duration on vowel intelligibility. Twelve American English vowels were recorded in the /hVd/ phonetic context by native speakers and non-native speakers. The English vowel duration patterns as a function of vowel produced by non-native speakers were generally similar to those produced by native speakers. These results imply that using duration differences across vowels may be an important strategy for non-native speakers’ production before they are able to employ spectral cues to produce and perceive English speech sounds. In the intelligibility experiment, vowels were selected from 10 native and non-native speakers and vowel durations were equalized at 170 ms. Intelligibility of vowels with original and equalized durations was evaluated by American English native listeners. Results suggested that vowel intelligibility of native and non-native speakers degraded slightly by 3–8% when durations were equalized, indicating that vowel duration plays a minor role in vowel intelligibility.

Keywords

Vowel duration duration pattern non-native speakers vowel intelligibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ainsworth

W. A.

(1972). Duration as a cue in the recognition of synthetic vowels. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 51, 648–651.

ANSI (2010). Specification for Audiometers. ANSI Report No. S3.6-2004, ANSI, New York.

Black

J. W.

(1949). Natural frequency, duration, and intensity of vowels in reading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 14, 216–221.

Bohn

O.-S.

(1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In Strange

(Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279–304). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Chen

Robb

Gilbert

Lerman

(2001). Vowel production by Mandarin speakers of English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 15, 427–440.

Crystal

T. H.

House

A. S.

(1988). The duration of American-English vowels: an overview. Journal of Phonetics, 16, 263–284.

Escudero

Boersma

(2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585.

Fant

(1960). The acoustic theory of speech production (pp. 15–27). The Hague, The Netherlands: Moulton.

Flege

J. E.

(1995). Second language speech learning: theory, findings and problems. In Strange

(Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.233–277). Timonium, MD: York.

10.

Flege

J. E.

Bohn

O.-S.

Jang

(1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.

11.

Hillenbrand

Getty

L. J.

Clark

M. J.

Wheeler

(1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English Vowels. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 97, 3099–3111.

12.

Hillenbrand

J. M.

Clark

M. J.

Houde

R. A.

(2000). Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 108, 3013–3022.

13.

Howie

J. M.

(1976). Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones (pp. 147–200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Jia

Strange

Collado

Guan

(2006). Perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin speakers: age-related differences vary with amount of L2 exposure. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 119, 1118–1130.

15.

Jin

S.-H.

Liu

(in press). Intelligibility of American english vowels and consonants spoken by International Students in the US. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.

16.

Lehiste

(1970). Suprasegmentals (pp. 1–168 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

17.

Miller

J. D.

(1989). Auditory-perceptual integration of the vowel. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 85, 2114–2134.

18.

Morrison

G. S.

(2005). An appropriate metric for cue weighting in L2 speech perception: Response to Escudero & Boersma (2004). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 597–606.

19.

Stevens

K. N.

(1959). The role of duration in vowel identification. Quarterly Progress Report, 52, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.

20.

Strange

(1989). Evolving theories of vowel perception. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2081–2087.

21.

Strange

Jenkins

J. J.

Johnson

T. L.

(1983). Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 74, 695–705.

22.

Studebaker

(1985). A “rationalized” arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 42, 56–64.

23.

Tiffany

(1953). Vowel recognition as a function of duration, frequency modulation and phonetic context. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorder, 18, 289–301.

24.

van Sauten

J. P. H

. (1992). Contextual effects on vowel duration. Speech Communication, 11, 513–546.

25.

van Wijingaarden

S. J

. (2001). Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech. Speech Communication, 35, 103–113.

26.

van Wijingaarden

S. J.

Steeneken

H. J. M.

Houtgast

. (2002). Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 111, 1906–1916.

27.

Wang

(2007). English as a lingua franca: Mutual intelligibility of Chinese, Dutch and American speakers of English. PhD dissertation, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.

28.

Yang

(1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245–261.