We investigate the temporal and kinematic properties of consonant gemination and heterosyllabic clusters as opposed to singletons and tautosyllabic clusters in Italian. The data show that the singleton versus geminate contrast is conveyed by specific kinematic properties in addition to systematic durational differences in both the consonantal and vocalic intervals; by contrast, tautosyllabic and heterosyllabic clusters differ significantly for the duration of the consonantal interval but do not vary systematically with respect to the vocalic interval and cannot be consistently differentiated at the kinematic level. We conclude that systematic variations in acoustic vowel duration and the kinematics of tongue tip gestures represent the phonetic correlates of the segmental phonological contrast between short and long consonants, rather than of syllable structure. Data are only partly consistent with the predictions of both moraic and gesture-based models of the syllable about the effects of syllable structure on speech production dynamics and call for a more gradient view of syllabification.
Articulate Instruments Ltd. (2012). Articulate assistant advanced user guide: Version 2.14.
3.
AvesaniC.VayraM.ZmarichC. (2009). Coordinazione vocale-consonante e prominenza accentuale in italiano. La sfida della Articulatory Phonology [Vowel-consonant coordination and accentual prominence in Italian. The challenge of Articultory Phonology]. In FerrariG.BenattiR.MoscaM. (Eds.), Linguistica e modelli tecnologici di ricerca, Atti del XL Congresso Internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI) (pp. 353–386). Bulzoni.
4.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.
5.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
6.
BeňušS. (2011). Control of phonemic length contrast and speech rate in vocalic and consonantal syllable nuclei. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), 2116–2127.
BothorelA. (1982). Étude phonétique et phonologique du breton parlé à Argol (Finistère-sud). [Phonetic and phonological study of Argol Breton]. Lille: Atelier reproduction des thèses, Lille III.
9.
BrowmanC. P.GoldsteinL. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155–180.
10.
BybeeJ. (2000). The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In BarlowM.KemmerS. (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 65–85). CSLI.
11.
ByrdD.SaltzmanE. (2003). The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 149–180.
12.
CalamaiS.CelataC. (2011, August27–31). Timing in Italian VNC sequences at different speech rates [Conference]. Interspeech2011 – 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Florence.
13.
CelataC.MairanoP. (2014). On the timing of V-to-V intervals in Italian: A review, and some new hypotheses. Revista de Filología Románica, 31, 37–53.
14.
ChenC.CelataC.RicciI. (2017). An EPG + UTI study of syllable onset and coda coordination and coarticulation in Italian. In BertiniC.CelataC.MeluzziC.LenociG.RicciI. (Eds.), Fattori sociali e biologici nella variazione fonetica—Social and biological factors in speech variation (Vol. 21, pp. 151–172). Officina.
15.
D’ImperioM. P.RosenthallS. (1999). Phonetics and phonology of main stress in Italian. Phonology, 16(1), 1–28.
16.
DipinoD.CelataC. (2018). An UTI study of alveolar stops in Italian. In ViettiA.SpreaficoL.MereuD.GalatàV. (Eds.), Il parlato nel contesto naturale—Speech in the natural context (pp. 41–53). Officinaventuno.
17.
DmitrievaO. (2019). Transferring perceptual cue-weighting from second language into first language: Cues to voicing in Russian speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 128–143.
18.
EspositoA.Di BenedettoM. G. (1999). Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(4), 2051–2062.
19.
FarnetaniE.KoriS. (1986). Effects of syllable and word structure on segmental durations in spoken Italian. Speech Communication, 5(1), 17–34.
20.
FavaE.Magno CaldognettoE. (1976). Studio sperimentale delle caratteristiche elettroacustiche delle vocali toniche e atone in bisillabi italiani [An experimental study of the electroacoustic features of stressed and unstressed vowels in Italian disyllables]. In SimoneR., et al. (Eds.), Atti del Convegno Internazionale di “Studi di Fonetica e Fonologia” (Padova, 1–2 ottobre 1973) (pp. 35–79). Bulzoni.
21.
FowlerC. A. (1981). A relationship between coarticulation and compensatory shortening. Phonetica, 38, 35–50.
22.
FowlerC. A. (1983). Converging sources of evidence on spoken and perceived rhythms of speech: Cyclic production of vowels in monosyllabic stress feet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(3), 386–412.
23.
Gili FivelaB.ZmarichC.PerrierP.SavariauxC.TisatoG. (2007). Acoustic and kinematic correlates of phonological length contrast in Italian consonants [Proceedings]. XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 6–10 August 2007.
GordonM. (2016). Phonological typology. Oxford University Press.
26.
HayesB. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
HertrichI.AckermannH. (1997). Articulatory control of phonological vowel length contrasts: Kinematic analysis of labial gestures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 523–536.
28.
JakubíčekM.KilgarriffA.KovářV.RychlýP.SuchomelV. (2013). The TenTen corpus family [Conference]. 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2013), Lancaster, UK, 22–26 July 2013.
29.
KeatingP. (1991). Coronal places of articulation. In ParadisC.PrunetJ.-F. (Eds.), Phonetics & Phonology: The special status of coronals (pp. 29–48). Academic Press.
30.
KenstowiczM. (2017). A note on the phonology and phonetics of CR, RC, and SC consonant clusters in Italian. In QuinnH.MassamD.MatthewsonL. (Eds.), Linguistic travels in time and space: Festschrift for Liz Pearce Wellington. Working Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 23, pp. 87–100). Victoria University of Wellington.
31.
KlattD. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(5), 1208–1221.
32.
KrämerM. (2009). The phonology of Italian. Oxford University Press.
33.
LehisteI. (1970). Suprasegmentals. MIT Press.
34.
LinS.BeddorP. S.CoetzeeA. W. (2014). Gestural reduction, lexical frequency, and sound change: A study of post-vocalic /l/. Laboratory Phonology, 5(1), 9–36.
35.
LöfqvistA. (2005). Lip kinematics in long and short stop and fricative consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(2), 858–878.
36.
LöfqvistA. (2006). Interarticulator programming: Effects of closure duration on lip and tongue coordination in Japanese. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 2872–2883.
37.
LöfqvistA. (2007). Tongue movement kinematics in long and short Japanese consonants. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 122(1), 512–518.
38.
LöfqvistA. (2017). Articulatory coordination in short and long consonants: An effect of rhythm class? In H. Kubozono (Ed.), The Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants (pp. 118–129). Oxford University Press.
39.
LoporcaroM. (2005). La sillabazione di muta cum liquida dal latino al romanzo [Muta cum liquida syllabification from Latin to Romance]. In KissS.MondinL.SalviG. (Eds.), Latin et langues romanes. Études linguistiques offertes à Jozsef Herman à l’occasione de son 80ème anniversaire (pp. 19–43). Niemeyer.
40.
LoporcaroM. (2007). Facts, theory and dogmas in historical linguistics: Vowel quantity from Latin to Romance. In SalmonsJ. C.Dubenion-SmithS. (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 2005. Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Madison, Wisconsin, 31 July–5 August 2005 (pp. 311–336). John Benjamins.
41.
MaddiesonI. (1984). Phonetic cues to syllabification. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 59, 85–101.
42.
MairanoP.De IacovoV. (2020). Gemination in northern versus central and southern varieties of Italian: A corpus-based investigation. Language & Speech, 63(3), 608–634.
43.
MarinS.PouplierM. (2010). Temporal organization of complex onsets and codas in American English: Testing the predictions of a gestural coupling model. Motor Control, 14(3), 380–407.
44.
MarottaG. (1985). Modelli e misure ritmiche: La durata vocalica in italiano [Rhythmical models and measures: Vowel duration in Italian]. Zanichelli.
45.
McCraryK. (2004). Reassessing the role of the syllable in Italian phonology: An experimental study of consonant cluster syllabification, definite article allomorphy and segment duration [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles].
46.
McMillanC. T.CorleyM.LickleyR. J. (2009). Articulatory evidence for feedback and competition in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(1), 44–66.
47.
MeluzziC. (2016). A new sonority degree in the realization of dental affricates /ts dz/ in Italian. In BallM. J.MüllerN. (Eds.), Challenging sonority. Cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 252–275). Equinox.
48.
MoosmüllerS.BrandstätterJ. (2014). Phonotactic information in the temporal organization of Standard Austrian German and the Viennese dialect. Language Sciences, 46, 84–95.
49.
MunhallK.FowlerC.SaltzmanE.HawkinsS. (1992). “Compensatory shortening” in monosyllables of spoken English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 225–239.
50.
ÖhmanS. E. G. (1967). Numerical model of coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 310–320.
51.
PastätterM.PouplierM. (2014, May5–8). The temporal coordination of Polish onset and coda clusters containing sibilants [Proceedings]. 10th International Seminar on Speech Production, Cologne, Germany.
52.
PayneE. M. (2006). Non-durational indices in Italian geminate consonants. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 36(1), 83–95.
53.
PouplierM. (2015). Between “whims of fashion” and “phonetic law”: Performance constraints in speech production in the face of linguistic diversity. In VayraM.AvesaniC.TamburiniF. (Eds.), Il farsi e disfarsi del linguaggio. Acquisizione, mutamento e destruttutrazione della strutura sonora del linguagguo / Language acquisition and language loss. Acquisition, change and disorders of the language sound structure (Vol. 21, pp. 41–57). Officina.
54.
PouplierM.LentzT. O.ChitoranI.HooleP. (2020). The imitation of coarticulatory timing patterns in consonant clusters for phonotactically familiar and unfamiliar sequences. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 11(1), 1–41.
55.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). https://www.R-project.org/
56.
RecasensD.PallarèsM. D.FontdevilaJ. (1997). A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 544–561.
57.
RidouaneR.HalléP. (2017). Word-initial geminates: From production to perception. In KubozonoH. (Ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants (pp. 66–84). Oxford University Press.
58.
ShaimanS. (2001). Kinematics of compensatory vowel shortening: The effect of speaking rate and coda composition on intra- and inter-articulatory timing. Journal of Phonetics, 29(1), 89–107.
59.
ŠimkoJ.O’DellM.VainioM. (2014). Emergent consonantal quantity contrast and context-dependence of gestural phasing. Journal of Phonetics, 44, 130–151.
60.
SmithC. L. (1992). The temporal organization of vowel and consonant gesture [PhD Dissertation, Yale University].
61.
SmithC. L. (1995). Prosodic patterns in the coordination of vowel and consonant gestures. In ConnellB.ArvanitiA. (Eds.), Phonology and Phonetic Evidence Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV (pp. 205–222). Cambridge University Press.
62.
StormeB. (2019). Contrast enhancement as motivation for closed syllable laxing and open syllable tensing. Phonology, 36(2), 303–340.
TimpanaroS. (1965). Muta cum liquida in poesia latina e nel latino volgare [Muta cum liquida in Latin poetry and Vulgar Latin]. Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale, 7, 1075–1103.
65.
TomaschekF.TuckerB. V.FasioloM.BaayenR. H. (2018). The consequences of lexical proficiency for articulation. Linguistic Vanguard, 4(s2), Article 20170018.
66.
TürkH.LippusP.ŠimkoJ. (2017). Context-dependent articulation of consonant gemination in Estonian. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 1–26.
67.
VayraM.AvesaniC.FowlerC. (1999). On the phonetic bases of vowel-consonant coordination in Italian: A study of stress and “compensatory shortening.” In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville & A. C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1–7 August 1999 (Vol. 1, pp. 495–498).
68.
VennemanT. (2012). Structural complexity of consonant clusters: A phonologist’s view. In HooleP.BombienL.PouplierM.MooshammerC.KühnertB. (Eds.), Consonant clusters and structural complexity (pp. 9–32). Mouton de Gruyter.
69.
VogelI. (1982). La sillaba come unità fonologica [The syllable as a phonological unit]. Zanichelli.
70.
ZeroualC.HooleP.GafosA. I. (2008). Spatio-temporal and kinematic study of Moroccan Arabic coronal geminate plosives. In SockR.FuchsS.LaprieY. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production, Strasbourg, France (pp. 135–138). Institut national polytechnique de Lorraine.
71.
ZmarichC.Gili FivelaB.PerrierP.SavariauxC.TisatoG. (2007). Consonanti scempie e geminate in italiano: Studio acustico e cinematico dell’articolazione linguale e bilabiale [Singleton and geminate consonants in Italian: Acoustic and kinematic study of the lingual and bilabial articulation]. In GiordaniV.BruseghiniV.CosiP. (Eds.), Atti del Convegno Nazionale AISV, Scienze vocali e del linguaggio. Metodologie di valutazione e risorse linguistiche (pp. 151–163). EDK Editore.
