This study used the perceptual-migration paradigm to explore whether Mandarin tones and syllable rhymes are processed separately during Mandarin speech perception. Following the logic of illusory conjunctions, we calculated the cross-ear migration of tones, rhymes, and their combination in Chinese and English listeners. For Chinese listeners, tones migrated more than rhymes. For English listeners, the opposite pattern was found. The results lend empirical support to autosegmental theory, which claims separability and mobility between tonal and segmental representations. They also provide evidence that such representations and their involvement in perception are deeply shaped by a listener’s linguistic experience.
CutlerA.ChenH. C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 165–179.
2.
DemolinD. (1991). L’analyse des segments, de la syllabe et des tons dans un jeu de langage mangbetu. Langages, 101, 30–50.
3.
DuanmuS. (2002). The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford University Press.
4.
GoldsmithJ. (1979). Autosegmental Phonology. New York: Garland Publishing.
5.
HombertJ. M. (1986). Word games: Some implications for analysis of tone and other phonological constructs. In OhalaJ. J.JaegerJ. J. (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp. 175–186). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
6.
KolinskyR. (1992). Conjunction errors as a tool for the study of perceptual processes. In AlegriaJ.HolenderD.MoraisJ.RadeauM. (eds.), Analytic Approaches to Human Cognition. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 133–149.
7.
KolinskyR.MoraisJ. (1996). Migrations in speech recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 611–620.
8.
KolinskyR.MoraisJ.CluytensM. (1995). Intermediate representations in spoken word recognition: Evidence from word illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 19–40.
9.
KungC.ChwillaD. J.SchriefersH. (2014). The interaction of lexical tone, intonation and semantic context in on-line spoken word recognition: An ERP study on Cantonese Chinese. Neuropsychologia, 53, 293–309.
10.
LeeL.NusbaumH. C. (1993). Processing interactions between segmental and suprasegmental information in native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 157–165.
11.
LiuS.SamuelA. (2007). The role of Mandarin tones in lexical access under different contextual conditions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 566–594.
12.
MaJ. K.CioccaV.WhitehillT. L. (2006). Effect of intonation on Cantonese lexical tonesa). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 3978–3987.
13.
MarcelA.J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238–300.
14.
MattysS.L.MelhornJ.F. (2005). How do syllables contribute to the perception of spoken English? Evidence from the migration paradigm. Language and Speech, 48, 223–253.
15.
MattysS.L.SamuelA.G.(1997). How lexical stress affects speech segmentation and interactivity: Evidence from the migration paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 87–116.
16.
MoraisJ. (1985). Literacy and awareness of the units of speech: Implications for research on the units of perception. Linguistics, 23, 707–721.
17.
MoraisJ.CaryL.AlegriaJ.BertelsonP. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?Cognition, 7, 323–331.
18.
MoraisJ.CastroS. L.Scliar-CabralL.KolinskyR.ContentA. (1987). The effects of literacy on the recognition of dichotic words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 451–465.
19.
MoraisJ.KolinskyR. (1994). Perception and awareness in phonological processing: The case of the phoneme. Cognition, 50, 287–297.
20.
NakamuraM.KolinskyR. (2014). Multiple functional units in the preattentive segmentation of speech in Japanese: Evidence from word illusions. Language and speech, 57, 513–543.
21.
SchirmerA.TangS. L.PenneyT. B.GunterT. C.ChenH. C. (2005). Brain responses to segmentally and tonally induced semantic violations in Cantonese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1–12.
22.
SerenoJ. A.LeeH. (2015). The contribution of segmental and tonal information in Mandarin spoken word processing. Language and Speech, 58, 131–151.
23.
SpeerS. R.ShihC. L.SlowiaczekM. L. (1989). Prosodic structure in language understanding: evidence from tone sandhi in Mandarin. Language and Speech, 32, 337–354.
24.
TongY.FrancisA. L.GandourJ. T. (2008). Processing dependencies between segmental and suprasegmental features in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 698–708.
25.
TreismanA.PatersonR. (1984). Emergent features, attention, and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10, 12–32.
26.
TreismanA.SchmidtH. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141.
27.
WooN. (1970). Tone in Northern Tepehuan. International Journal of American Linguistics, 36, 18–30.
28.
YeY.ConnineC.M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: The role of tone information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 609–630.
29.
YipM. (2002). Tone. Cambridge University Press.
30.
ZhouX.Marslen-WilsonW. (1994). Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processing, 9, 393–422.
