This study investigated identification of fragmented Mandarin tones by non-native listeners. Monosyllabic Mandarin words were digitally processed to generate intact, silent-center, center-only, and onset-only syllables. The syllables were recorded with two carrier phrases such that the offset of the carrier tone and the onset of the target tone were either continuous or discontinuous in fundamental frequency (F0). The syllables were presented with an original carrier phrase, excised from the carrier phrase, or excised and cross-spliced with another carrier phrase. Response accuracy and reaction time were measured, and tone confusion patterns were analyzed. Overall, tone identification varied as a function of modification and tone. Intact and center-only syllables were identified more accurately than silent-center and onset-only syllables. Tone 2 was consistently the most challenging tone to identify. Although the performance level of the third-year students approached that of native listeners reported in Lee, Tao, and Bond (2008), the non-native listeners did not show evidence of using coarticulatory information. Nonetheless, the continuity or discontinuity in F0 between the carrier and target tones did affect tone identification, suggesting the influence of context in non-native tone identification.
Abramson, A.S. ( 1972). Tonal experiments with whispered Thai. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre (pp.31-44). The Hague: Mouton.
2.
Abramson, A.S. ( 1978). Static and dynamic acoustics in distinctive tones . Language and Speech, 21, 319-325.
3.
Best, C.T. ( 1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception . In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience (pp.171-206). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
4.
Best, C.T., McRoberts, G.W., & Sithole, N.M. ( 1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 45-60.
5.
Blicher, D.L., Diehl, R.L., & Cohen, L.B. ( 1990). Effects of syllable duration on the perception of the Mandarin tone 2/tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement . Journal of Phonetics, 18, 37-49.
6.
Bluhme, H., & Burr, R. ( 1971). An audio-visual display of pitch for teaching Chinese tones. Studies in Linguistics, 22, 51-57.
7.
Bond, Z.S., & Small, L.H. ( 1983). Voicing, vowel and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 470-474.
8.
Broselow, E., Hurtig, R.R., & Ringen, C. ( 1987). The perception of second language prosody. In G. Ioup & S. H. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System (pp.350-362). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
9.
Chin, T. ( 1987). Half-third first: On the nature of the third tone . Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 22, 87-101.
10.
Cutler, A. ( 1986). Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, 29, 201-220.
11.
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech , 40, 141-201.
12.
Cutler, A., & van Donselaar, W. (2001). Voornaam is not a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech, 44, 171-195.
13.
Cutler, A., Wales, R., Cooper, N., & Janssen, J. ( 2007). Dutch listeners’ use of surprasegmental cues to English stress. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007), Saarbrücken, Germany (pp.1913-1916). Dudweiler: Pirrot .
14.
van Donselaar, W., Koster, M., & Cutler, A. ( 2005). Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 58, 251-273.
15.
Dupoux, E., Christophe, P., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A distressing deafness in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406-421.
16.
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress "deafness". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 110, 1606-1618.
17.
Flege, J.E. ( 1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience (pp.233-272). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
18.
Fox, R.A., & Qi, Y.-Y. ( 1990). Context effects in the perception of lexical tones . Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 18, 261-284.
19.
Fox, R.A., & Unkefer, J. ( 1985). The effect of lexical status on the perception of tone . Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 13, 69-90.
20.
Gandour, J. ( 1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149-175.
21.
Gandour, J.T., & Harshman, R.A. (1978). Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: A multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and Speech, 22, 1-33.
22.
Gårding, E., Kratochvil, P., Svantesson, J.-O., & Zhang, J. ( 1986). Tone 4 and Tone 3 discrimination in Modern Standard Chinese . Language and Speech, 29, 281-293.
23.
Gottfried, T.L., & Suiter, T.L. ( 1997). Effects of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin Chinese vowels and tones. Journal of Phonetics , 25, 207-231.
24.
Hallé, P.A., Chang, Y.-C., & Best, C.T. ( 2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 395-421.
25.
Hawkins, S. ( 1999). Auditory capacities and phonological development: Animal, baby, and foreign listeners. In J. M. Pickett , The Acoustics of Speech Communication: Fundamentals, Speech Perception Theory, and Technology (pp.183-197). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
Howie, J.M. ( 1976). Acoustical Studies of Mandarin Vowels and Tones . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Kiriloff, C. ( 1969). On the auditory perception of tones in Mandarin . Phonetica, 20, 63-67.
28.
Lee, C.-Y. ( 2000). Lexical tone in spoken word recognition: A view from Mandarin Chinese. Brown University Dissertation.
29.
Lee, C.-Y., Tao, L., & Bond, Z.S. ( 2008). Identification of acoustically modified Mandarin tones by native listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 537-563.
30.
Lin, W.C.J. ( 1985). Teaching Mandarin tones to adult English speakers: Analysis of difficulties with suggested remedies. RELC Journal , 16, 31-47.
31.
Liu, S., & Samuel, A.G. ( 2004). Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when F0 information is neutralized. Language and Speech, 47, 109-138.
32.
Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M.M., & Tseng, C.-Y. ( 1985). The evaluation and integration of pitch height and pitch contour in lexical tone perception in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 13, 267-289.
33.
Mertus, J.A. ( 2000). The Brown Lab Interactive Speech System. Providence, RI.
34.
Miracle, W.C. ( 1989). Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association , 24, 49-65.
35.
Repp, B.H., & Lin, W.-B. ( 1990). Integration of segmental and tonal information in speech perception: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Phonetics , 18, 481-495.
36.
Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2005). Cross-language speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp.546-566). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
37.
Shen, X.S. ( 1989). Toward a register approach in teaching Mandarin tones . Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association , 24, 27-47.
38.
Shen, X.S., & Lin, M. ( 1991). A perceptual study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. Language and Speech, 34, 145-156.
39.
Shen, X.S., Lin, M., & Yan, J. ( 1993). F0 turning point as an F0 cue to tonal contrast: A case study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2241-2243.
40.
Shih, C. ( 1987). The phonetics of the Chinese tonal system. Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Laboratories.
41.
Slowiaczek, L.M. ( 1990). Effects of lexical stress in auditory word recognition . Language and Speech, 33, 47-68.
Strange, W., Jenkins, J.J., & Johnson, T.L. ( 1983). Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 695-705.
44.
Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., Carrell, T., & McGee, T. ( 1997). Central auditory system plasticity: Generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3762-3773.
45.
Tseng, C.-Y. ( 1981). An acoustic phonetic study on tones in Mandarin Chinese . Ph.D. dissertation. Providence, RI.
46.
Wang, Y., Spence, M.M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J.A. ( 1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3649-3658.
47.
Whalen, D.H., & Xu, Y. ( 1992). Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica, 49, 25-47.
48.
White, C.M. ( 1981). Tonal perception errors and interference from English intonation. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association , 16, 27-56.
49.
Xu, C.X., & Xu, Y. ( 2003). Effects of consonant aspiration on Mandarin tones . Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33, 165-181.
50.
Xu, Y. ( 1994). Production and perception of coarticulated tones . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2240-2253.
51.
Xu, Y. ( 1997). Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 61-83.
52.
Xu, Y. ( 2004). Understanding tone from the perspective of production and perception. Language and Linguistics, 5, 757-797.
53.
Yang, S. ( 1992). A preliminary study on the perceptual center of tones in Standard Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 3, 247-253.
