This study examined the second language (L2) speech development of a group of Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) college-level learners (N = 83) and the association between their aptitude, anxiety, and L2 speech development. The performance of the participants’ L2 speech, including speech comprehensibility and accentedness, was evaluated using a sentence reading task and a pair of picture description tasks (pre- and post-test). In addition, students completed the LLAMA tests (language learning and aptitude measurement in adults) and the Second Language Speaking Anxiety Scale (SLSAS). The t-test revealed that after one semester of English speaking and pronunciation instruction, the EFL students in the study demonstrated significant gains in their L2 speech performance in terms of accentedness and comprehensibility in both controlled and impromptu tasks. Regression analyses revealed that phonemic coding ability positively predicted gains in comprehensibility but negatively predicted gains in accentedness during sentence reading. In addition, associative memory was positively associated with comprehensibility gains in the picture description task. Anxiety appeared to be a strong predictor of participants’ gains in speech comprehensibility and accentedness during the picture description task.
Baker-SmemoeW.HaslamN. (2013). The effect of language learning aptitude, strategy use and learning context on L2 pronunciation learning. Applied Linguistics, 34, 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams066
2.
Baran-ŁucarzM. (2011). The relationship between language anxiety and the actual and perceived levels of foreign language pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.4.3
3.
CarrollJ. B.SaponS. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test. Psychological Corporation
4.
CebrianJ. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 372–387.
5.
Celce-MurciaM.BrintonD.GoodwinJ. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. Cambridge University Press.
6.
ChengY. S. (2017). Development and preliminary validation of four brief measures of L2 language skill-specific anxiety. System, 68, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.009
7.
ChengY. S.HorwitzE. K.SchallertD. L. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00095
8.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
9.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/101017/S0272263197001010.
10.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63, 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12000
11.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.
12.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J.WiebeG. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047
13.
DewaeleJ. M.Al SarajT. M. (2015). Foreign language classroom anxiety of Arab learners of English: The effect of personality, linguistic and sociobiographical variables. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.2.2
14.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO.-S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In WaylandR. (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press.
15.
GolestaniN.ZatorreR. J. (2009). Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology. Brain and Language, 109, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.01.005
16.
GranenaG. (2019). Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and HI-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263118000256
17.
GranenaG.LongM. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43103927
18.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
19.
HorwitzE. K. (2017). On the misreading of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope (1986) and the need to balance anxiety research and the experiences of anxious language learners. In GkonouC.DaubneyM.DewaeleJ.-M. (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 31–50). Multilingual Matters.
20.
HorwitzE. K.HorwitzM. B.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/327317
21.
HuenschA.NagleC. (2022). Revisiting the moderating effect of speaker proficiency on the relationships among intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1. 15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000213
22.
IsaacsT.ThomsonR. I. (2013). Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10, 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2013.769545
23.
KennedyS.GuénetteD.MurphyJ.AllardS. (2015). The role of pronunciation on comprehension between speakers of French as a lingua franca. Canadian Modern Language Review, 7125, 1. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2139
24.
KermadA. . A. . D. (2018). Speaker and listener variability in the perception of non-native speech [Doctoral dissertation]. Northern Arizona University.
25.
KrashenS. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
26.
LangP. J. (1971). The application of psychophysiological methods to the study of psychotherapy and behavior modification. In BerginA. E.GarfieldS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (pp. 75–125). Wiley.
27.
Larson-HallJ. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24, 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307082981
LiS. (2018). Language aptitude. In BurnsA.RichardsJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to learning English as a second language (pp. 63–72). Cambridge University Press.
30.
LiS. (2019). Six decades of language aptitude research: A comprehensive and critical review. In WenZ.SkehanP.BiedronA.LiS.SparksR. L. (Eds.), Language aptitude. Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 78–96). Routledge.
31.
LiS.HiverP.PapiM. (2022). Individual differences in second language acquisition: Theory, research, and practice. In. In Li.S.HiverP.PapiM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 3–34). Routledge.
MacIntyreP. D. (2017). An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In GkonouC.DaubneyM.DewaeleJ. (Ed.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 11–30). Multilingual Matters.
34.
MacIntyreP. D.GardnerR. C. (1991). Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning, 41, 85–117.
35.
MayersA. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology. Pearson.
36.
MearaP. (2005). Llama language aptitude tests: The manual. Lognostics.
37.
MoraJ. C.Mora-PlazaI.Bermejo MirandaG. (2024). Speaking anxiety and task complexity effects on second language speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34, 292–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12494
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M. (1995a). Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97.
40.
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M. (1995b). Processing time, accent and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800305
41.
NagleC. (2013). A reexamination of ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: Length of immersion, motivation, and phonological short-term memory. In VossE.TaiS.–J. D.LiZ. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2011 second language research forum (pp. 148–161). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
42.
NagleC. (2018). Motivation, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: Investigating Motivation as a time-varying predictor of pronunciation development. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12461
43.
NagleC. L.TrofimovichP.O’BrienM. G.KennedyS. (2022). Beyond linguistic features: Exploring behavioral and affective correlates of comprehensible second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000073
44.
NicolaidisK.MattheoudakisM. (2012). The PRO-VOC method: Combining pronunciation and vocabulary teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50(4), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2012-0012
Pérez CastillejoS. (2019). The role of foreign language anxiety on L2 utterance fluency during a final exam. Language Testing, 36(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218777783
47.
SaitoK. (2011). Examining the role of explicit phonetic instruction in native-like and comprehensible pronunciation development: An instructed SLA approach to L2 phonology. Language Awareness, 20, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.540326
48.
SaitoK. (2017). Effects of sound, vocabulary, and grammar learning aptitude on adult second language speech attainment in foreign language classrooms. Language Learning, 67, 665–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12244
49.
SaitoK. (2019). The role of aptitude in second language segmental learning: The case of Japanese learners’ English /ɹ/ pronunciation attainment in classroom settings. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000528
50.
SaitoK. (2021), What characterizes comprehensible and native-like pronunciation among english-as-a-second-language speakers? Meta-analyses of phonological, rater, and instructional factors. TESOL Quarterly, 55, 866–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3027
51.
SaitoK.AkiyamaY. (2017). Linguistic correlates of comprehensibility in second language Japanese speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.02sai
52.
SaitoK.DewaeleJ.-M.AbeM.In’namiY. (2018). Motivation, emotion, learning experience, and second language comprehensibility development in classroom settings: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68, 709–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12297
53.
SaitoK.DewaeleJ.-M.HanzawaK. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between motivation and late second language speech learning in classroom settings. Language and Speech, 60, 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830916687793
54.
SaitoK.PlonskyL. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A Proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345
55.
SaitoK.SunH.TierneyY. A. (2019). Explicit and implicit aptitude effects on second language speech learning: Scrutinizing segmental and suprasegmental sensitivity and performance via behavioral and neurophysiological measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1123–1140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000895
56.
SaitoK.SuzukidaY.SunH. (2019). Aptitude, experience, and second language pronunciation proficiency development in classroom settings: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000432
57.
SaitoY.SaitoK. (2017). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21, 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816643111
58.
SkehanP. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
SkehanP. (2016). Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In GranenaG.JacksonD.YilmazY. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition (pp. 15–38). John Benjamins.
60.
SunH.SaitoK.DewaeleJ.-M. (2024). Cognitive and sociopsychological individual differences, experience, and naturalistic second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 74, 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12561
61.
SuzukiY.DeKeyserR. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67, 747–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241
62.
SuzukidaY.SaitoK. (2023). Detangling experiential, cognitive, and sociopsychological individual differences in second language speech learning: Cross-sectional and longitudinal investigations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(4), 762–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000700
63.
SzyszkaM. (2011). Foreign language anxiety and self-perceived English pronunciation competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.2.7
64.
TeimouriY.GoetzeJ.PlonskyL. (2019). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000311
65.
ThomsonR. I.DerwingT. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076
66.
TrofimovichP.IsaacsT. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168
67.
UchiharaT.WebbS.SaitoK.TrofimovichP. (2023). Frequency of exposure influences accentedness and comprehensibility in learners’ pronunciation of second language words. Language Learning, 73, 84–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12517
YilmazY.KoyluY. (2016). The interaction between phonetic coding ability and feedback exposure condition. In GranenaG.JacksonD.YilmazY. (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition (pp. 303–326). John Benjamins.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
