The design of many shelters for laboratory mice, particularly plastic shelters, is mainly driven by economic, ergonomic and hygiene considerations, with little focus on providing the animals with opportunities to express species-specific behaviours and control over their environment. Even in the presence of artificial shelters (plastic houses, tunnels), laboratory mice will readily burrow if given the opportunity. The main aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the importance of access to sheltered space for laboratory mice. We pair-housed mice (BALB/c, SWISS and C57BL/6, male and female) in conventional laboratory cages that contained either (i) resources to build underground shelter (burrowing substrate) or (ii) artificial structures providing shelter (e.g. red plastic house). We assessed how mice used these resources, as well as their preferences when given a choice between different shelters. In addition, we assessed the insulating properties of different shelters. Mice spent most of their time underground in deep bedding and the least time inside the standard red plastic house, where they nested outside the house. They also showed a strong preference for the deep burrow cage, and the most relevant features of preferred shelters seem to be darkness and being underground. Nesting material alone was also less insulating, possibly contributing to an increased need for non-shivering thermogenesis.
CaitJWinderCBMasonGJ.How much “enrichment” is enough for laboratory rodents? A systematic review and meta-analysis re-assessing the impact of well-resourced cages on morbidity and mortality. Appl Anim Behav Sci2024; 278: 106361.
2.
OlssonIADahlbornK. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: A review of “environmental enrichment”. Lab Anim2002; 36: 243–270.
3.
HutchinsonEAveryAVandeWoudeS.Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents. ILAR J2005; 46: 148–161.
4.
National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 8th ed.Washington (DC): National Academies Press, 2011.
5.
StemmerKKotzbeckPZaniF, et al. Thermoneutral housing is a critical factor for immune function and diet-induced obesity in C57BL/6 nude mice. International Journal of Obesity2015; 39: 791–797.
6.
GaskillBNGarnerJP.Stressed out: Providing laboratory animals with behavioral control to reduce the physiological effects of stress. Lab Anim2017; 46: 142–145.
7.
HylanderBLRepaskyEA.Thermoneutrality, mice, and cancer: A heated opinion. Trends Cancer2016; 2: 166–175.
8.
VialardFOlivierM.Thermoneutrality and immunity: How Does cold stress affect disease?Front Immunol2020; 11: 588387.
9.
GaneshanKChawlaA.Warming the mouse to model human diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol2017; 13: 458–465.
10.
GaskillBNPritchett-CorningKR.Nest building as an indicator of illness in laboratory mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci2016; 180: 140–146.
11.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union2010; L276: 33–79.
12.
Canadian Council on Animal Care. CCAC guidelines: Mice. Ottawa (ON): CCAC, 2022.
13.
SherwinCMHaugETerkelsenN, et al. Studies on the motivation for burrowing by laboratory mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci2004; 88: 343–358.
14.
AdamsNBoiceR.Mouse (Mus) burrows: Effects of age, strain, and domestication. Anim Learn Behav1981; 9: 140–144.
15.
RatuskiASMakowskaIJDvorackKR, et al. Using approach latency and anticipatory behaviour to assess whether voluntary playpen access is rewarding to laboratory mice. Sci Rep2021; 11: 1–13.
16.
GygaxMFortesMSVoelklB, et al. Rattling the cage: Behaviour and resource use of mice in laboratory and pet cages. Appl Anim Behav Sci2024; 278: 106381.
17.
Van LooPLBlomHJMeijerMK, et al. Assessment of the use of two commercially available environmental enrichments by laboratory mice by preference testing. Laboratory Animals2005; 39: 58–67.
EnnaceurA.Open space anxiety test in rodents: The elevated platform with steep slopes. In Psychiatric Disorders: Methods and Protocols2011; 177–191.
25.
EnnaceurAMichalikovaSvan RensburgR, et al. Models of anxiety: Responses of mice to novelty and open spaces in a 3D maze. Behav Brain Res2006; 174: 9–38.
26.
GaskillBNGordonCJPajorEA, et al. Impact of nesting material on mouse body temperature and physiology. Physiol Behav2013; 110: 87–95.
MakowskaIJWearyDM.The importance of burrowing, climbing and standing upright for laboratory rats. R Soc Open Sci2016; 3: 160136.
29.
LópezGBasterraLAAcuñaL, et al. Determination of the emissivity of wood for inspection by infrared thermography. J Nondestruct Eval2013; 32: 172–176.
30.
PrattBLGoldmanBD.Activity rhythms and photoperiodism of syrian hamsters in a simulated burrow system. Physiol Behav1986; 36: 83–89.
31.
LathamNMasonG.From house mouse to mouse house: The behavioural biology of free-living Mus musculus and its implications in the laboratory. Appl Anim Behav Sci2004; 86: 261–289.
32.
WeidenmayerC.Causation of the ontogenetic development of stereotypic digging in gerbils. Anim Behav1997; 53: 461–470.
33.
ArakawaHBlanchardDCBlanchardRJ.Colony formation of C57BL/6J mice in visible burrow system: Identification of eusocial behaviors in a background strain for genetic animal models of autism. Behav Brain Res2007; 176: 27–39.
34.
DeaconRM. Housing, husbandry and handling of rodents for behavioral experiments. Nature Protocols2006; 1: 936–946.
35.
FreymannJTsaiPPStelzerH, et al. The impact of bedding volumes on laboratory mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci2017; 186: 72–79.
36.
JirkofP.Burrowing and nest building behavior as indicators of well-being in mice. J Neurosci Methods2014; 234: 139–146.
37.
TownsendP.Use of in-cage shelters by laboratory rats. Anim Welf1997; 6: 95–103.
38.
SwetterBJKarpiakCPCannonJT.Separating the effects of shelter from additional cage enhancements for group-housed BALB/cJ mice. Neurosci Lett2011; 495: 205–209.
39.
Coke-MurphyCBuendiaMASaboridoTP, et al. Simple shelter-style environmental enrichment alters behavior in mice. Transl Neurosci2014; 5: 185–196.
40.
GjendalKOttesenJLSørensenDB.Does colour matter? Preference of mice for different colours of the house mouse igloo: An observational study. Scand J Lab Anim Sci2018; 44: 1–6.
41.
SachanontaNSa-ngeunreungWSa-ing-kaewS, et al. Preference testing as environmental enrichment assessment for laboratory mice. The Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2013; 43: 205–211.
42.
Van de WeerdHAVan LooPLVan ZutphenLF, et al. Preferences for nest boxes as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Animal Welfare1998; 7: 11–25.
43.
BlomHJVantintelenGVan VorstenboschCJ, et al. Preferences of mice and rats for types of bedding material. Laboratory Animals1996; 30: 234–244.
44.
Van De WeerdHAVan LooPLVan ZutphenLF, et al. Strength of preference for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci1998; 55: 369–382.
45.
Van LooPLVan De WeerdHAVan ZutphenLF, et al. Preference for social contact versus environmental enrichment in male laboratory mice. Lab Anim2004; 38(2): 178–188.
46.
Crawcroft R. Mice all over. Chicago (IL): Chicago Zoological Society, 1973.
47.
BisazzaA, et al. Social organization and territorial behaviour in three strains of mice. Ital J Zool1981; 48: 157–167.
48.
PooleTBMorganHD. Social and territorial behaviour of laboratory mice (Mus musculus L.) in small complex areas. Anim Behav1976; 24: 476–480.
49.
KappelSHawkinsPMendlMT.To group or not to group? Good practice for housing male laboratory mice. Animals2017; 7: 88.
50.
GaskillBNKarasAZGarnerJP, et al. Nest building as an indicator of health and welfare in laboratory mice. J Vis Exp2013; 82: 51012.
51.
JamesCMOlejniczakSHRepaskyEA.How murine models of human disease and immunity are influenced by housing temperature and mild thermal stress. Temperature2023; 10: 166–178.
52.
LiMSpeakmanJR. Setting ambient temperature conditions to optimize translation of molecular work from the mouse to human: The “Goldilocks Solution.” Brown Adipose Tissue: Methods Mol Biol2022; 235–250.
53.
HankensonFCMarxJOGordonCJ, et al. Effects of rodent thermoregulation on animal models in the research environment. Comp Med2018; 68: 425–438.
54.
BertolaAGallerandAIvanovS.Immune cell involvement in brown adipose tissue functions. Discov Immunol2022; 1: 1–8.
55.
WittekLToumaCNitezkiT, et al. Reduction in cold stress in an innovative metabolic cage housing system increases animal welfare in laboratory mice. Animals2023; 13: 2866.
56.
LacMTavernierGMoroC. Does housing temperature influence glucose regulation and muscle-fat crosstalk in mice?. Biochimie2023; 210: 35–39.
57.
CaitJCaitAScottRW, et al. Conventional laboratory housing increases morbidity and mortality in research rodents: Results of a meta-analysis. BMC Biol2022; 20: 15.
58.
BarrettLABlacheD.Development of a behavioural demand method for use with Pekin ducks. Appl Anim Behav Sci2019; 214: 42–49.
59.
HemsworthPHEdwardsLE, et al. Natural behaviours, their drivers and their implications for laying hen welfare. Anim Prod Sci2020; 61: 915–930.
60.
FranksB.What do animals want?Anim Welf2019; 28: 1–10.
61.
GurfeinBTStammAWBacchettiP, et al. The calm mouse: An animal model of stress reduction. Mol Med2012; 18: 606–617.
62.
RuttenK. Conventional behavioral models and readouts in drug discovery: The importance of improving translation. In: SchreiberR. (eds) Modern CNS drug discovery. Springer, Cham. 2024, 191–205.
63.
du SertNPHurstVAhluwaliaA, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol2020; 18: e3000410.
