Ackerman, D. B. (1989). Intellectual and practical criteria for successful curriculum integration. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 25-37). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
2.
Ackerman, D. B. , & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Integrating thinking and learning skills across the curriculum. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 77-95). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3.
Anders, P. L. , & Pritchard, T. G. (1993). Integrated curriculum and instruction for the middle grades. The Elementary School journal, 93, 611-624.
4.
Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
5.
Brooks, J. G. , & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6.
Brophy, J. , & Alleman J. (1991). A caveat: Curriculum integration isn't always a good idea. Educational Leadership, 49, 66-67.
7.
Bybee, R. , Buchwald, C., Crissman, S., Heil, D., Kuerbis, P.Matsumoto, C., & Mclnerney, J. (1989). Science and technology education for the elementary years: Frameworks for curriculum and instruction. Andover, MA: The National Center for Improving Science Education.
8.
Cotton, K. (1982). Effects of interdisciplinary team teaching: Research synthesis. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Education Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 230 533).
9.
Fogarty, R. (1991). How to integrate the curricula. Palatine, IL: IRI/ Skylight Publishing.
10.
Fredericks, A. D. , Meinbach, A. M., & Rothlein, L. (1993). Thematic units: An integrated approach to teaching science and social studies. New York: Harper-Collins.
11.
Gardner, H. , & Boix-Mansilla, V. (1994). Teaching for understanding within and across the disciplines. Educational Leadership, 51, 14-18.
12.
Goodlad, J. I. (1964). School curriculum reform in the United States. New York: The Fund for the Advancement of Education.
13.
Grady, J. (1994). Interdisciplinary curriculum: A fusion of reform ideas. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Education Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 375 980).
14.
Harter, S. (1978). Effective motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 21, 34-64.
15.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
16.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989a). The growing need for interdisciplinary curriculum content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 1-11). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17.
Jacobs, H. H. (Ed.). (1989b). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18.
Jacobs, H. H. (1991). Planning for curriculum integration. Educational Leadership, 49, 27-28.
19.
Kiernan, L. J. (Producer). (1993). Integrating the curriculum [video]. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20.
Mathematics Framework for California Public Schools. (1992). Sacramento: California State Department of Education.
21.
Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory (MCREL) . (1993). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform. Denver, CO: Author.
22.
Mosenthal, J. H. , & Ball, D. L. (1992). Constructing new forms of teaching: Subject matter knowledge in inservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 347-356.
23.
National Council for the Social Studies . (1994). Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics . (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
25.
Perkins, D. (1991). Educating for insight. Educational Leadership, 49, 4-8.
26.
Piaget, J. (1955). The language and thought of the child. New York: World.
27.
Scherer, M. (1995). How Alverno shapes teachers: A conversation with Mary Diez. Educational Leadership, 52, 50-54.
28.
Simon, M. A. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers' knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 233-254.
29.
St. Clair, B. , & Hough, D. L. (1992, December). Interdisciplinary teaching: A review of the literature. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 373 056)
30.
Stipek, D. J. (1993). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
Vars, G. F (1991). Integrated curriculum in historical perspective. Educational Leadership. 49, 14-15.
32.
White, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-233.
33.
Wiggins, G. (1989). The futility of trying to teach everything of importance. Educational Leadership, 44-59.
