Family partnerships should be a central component of teacher preparation. Although research provides family engagement strategies, little research offers teacher educators guidance from the perspectives of families themselves. The purpose of this convergent mixed-method study was to begin to fill the void in the literature by investigating family perspectives of theirs and their children’s experience in 10 reading clinic/literacy lab literacy specialist preparation programs across the United States and Canada. Through analysis of survey ratings (N = 132) and responses to structured interviews to (N = 84), this study found that families valued clinic/lab tutors building relationships with them, responding to their children’s strengths and needs, promoting self-efficacy, and working together as partners. Methods used in this study can provide a useful model for how teacher educators can intentionally seek input from families. Findings have implications for teacher educators advocating for and centering family engagement in teacher preparation.
AbregoM. H.RubinR.SutterbyJ. A. (2006). They call me “Maestra””: Preservice teachers’ interactions with parents in a reading tutoring program. Action in Teacher Education, 28(1), 3–12.
2.
AhmedS. (2018). Being the change. Heinemann.
3.
Amaro-JimenezC. (2016). Preservice teachers’ reflections of their involvement in a home-school connection project in teacher education. Bilingual Research Journal, 39(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2016.1139
4.
AmateaE.CholewaB.MixonK. (2012). Influencing preservice teachers’ attitudes about working with low-income and/or ethnic minority families. Urban Education, 47(4), 801–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912436846
5.
AssafL.LopezM. (2012). Reading rocks: Creating a space for preservice teachers to become responsive teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33(4), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2012.732667
6.
AtkinsonT.ColbyS. (2006). Who’s teaching, who’s learning? Analyzing the professional growth of graduate student tutors. Mentoring & Tutoring, 14(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260500493642
7.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth.
8.
BransfordJ. D.SchwartzD. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In Iran-NejadA.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61–100). American Educational Research Association.
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (2005). The bioecological theory of human development. In BronfenbrennerU. (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development (pp. 3–15). Sage.
10.
CarrK. (2003). Today’s reading clinic: How relevant is the graduate reading practicum?The Reading Teacher, 57(3), 256–268.
11.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Mixed methods procedures. In CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (Eds.), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed., pp. 213–246). Sage.
12.
CuevasP.SchummJ. S.Mits-CashM.PilonietaP. (2006). Reading clinics in the U.S.: A national survey of present practice. Journal of Reading Education, 31(2), 5–12.
13.
D’AbateR.McVeeM.RinkerT.SchillerJ. (2018). Tutoring in a literacy center: An exploration of a struggling learner’s missed opportunities for substantial contributions. Mentoring and Tutoring, 26(5), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2018.1561023
14.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Education, 61(1–2), 35–47.
15.
de AcostaM. (1996). A foundational approach to preparing teachers for family and community involvement in children’s education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487196047001003
16.
DeeneyT.DozierC.SmitJ.DavisS.LasterB.ApplegateM.CobbJ.. . .MorewoodA. (2011). Clinic experiences that promote transfer to school contexts: What matters in clinical teacher preparation. In DunstonP.GambrellL.HeadleyK.FullertonS.SteckerP.GillisV.BatesC. C. (Eds.), 60th annual yearbook of the Literacy Research Association (pp. 127–143). Literacy Research Association.
17.
DozierC.DeeneyT. (2013). Keeping learners at the center of teaching. In OrtliebE. T.CheekE. H.Jr (Eds.), Advanced literacy practices: From the clinic to the classroom (Vol. 2, pp. 367–385). Emerald Publishers.
18.
DozierC.JohnstonP.RogersR. (2006). Critical literacy/critical teaching: Tools for preparing responsive teachers. Teachers College Press.
19.
DozierC.RuttenI. (2005). Responsive teaching toward responsive teachers: Mediating transfer through intentionality, enactment, and articulation. Journal of Literacy Research, 37(4), 459–492.
20.
DuganJ. (2022). Co-constructing family engagement. Educational Leadership, 80(1), 20–26.
21.
DunstonP. J. (2007). Instructional practices, struggling readers and a university-based reading clinic. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(5), 328–338.
FennimoreB. (2017). Permission not required: The power of parents to disrupt educational hypocrisy. Review of Research in Education, 41, 159–181. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16687974
24.
FloresT. (2017). Writing the threads of our lives: Stories from a bilingual family writing project. In CoulterC.Jimenez-SilvaM. (Eds.), Culturally sustaining and revitalizing pedagogies: Language, culture, and power (pp. 209–223). Emerald.
25.
FooteM.Roth McduffieA.TurnerE.AguirreJ.BartellT.DrakeC. (2013). Orientations of prospective teachers toward students’ family and community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.003
26.
FredricksJ. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into Practice, 50(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.607401
27.
GonzálezN.MollL.AmantiC. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Erlbaum.
28.
HelfrichS.BeanR. (2011). What matters: Preparing teachers of reading. Reading Horizons, 50(4), 241–262.
29.
HoffmanJ.SvrcekN.LammertC.Daly-LeschA.SteinitzE.GreeterE.DeJulioS. (2019). A research review of literacy tutoring and mentoring in initial teacher preparation: Toward practices that can transform teaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X198332
30.
HoffmanJ.WetzelM.PetersonK. (2016). Approximating literacy practices in tutorials: What is learned and what matters for teacher preparation. Literacy and Instruction, 55(3), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2015.1128023
International Literacy Association. (2018). Transforming literacy teacher preparation: Practice makes possible [Literacy leadership brief].
33.
IshimaruA. M. (2019). Just schools: Building equitable collaborations with families and communities. Teachers College Press.
34.
The jamovi project. (2021). jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
35.
JohnstonP. (2004). Choice words. Stenhouse.
36.
KirmaciM. (2019). Reporting educators’ experiences regarding family-school interactions with implications for best practices. School Community Journal, 29(2), 129–156.
37.
KuglerE. G. (2011). Is anyone listening to families’ dreams?Educational Leadership, 68(8), 32–36.
38.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009). The dreamkeepers. Jossey-Bass.
39.
LasterB. (1999). Welcoming family literacy at the front door. In MosenthalP.EversenD. (Eds.), Reconsidering the role of the reading clinic in a new age of literacy (pp. 325–346). JAI Press.
40.
LazarA. M.EdwardsP. A.McMillonG. T. (2012). Bridging literacy and equity: The essential guide to social equity teaching. Teachers College Press.
41.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
42.
MappK. L.HongS. (2010). Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach parent. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L. (Eds.), Handbook of school-family partnerships (pp. 345–361). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876046
43.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
44.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
45.
MorrisD. (2011). Practicum training for teachers of struggling readers. Kappan, 92(8), 54–57.
46.
National Association for Family, School, and Community Engagement (NAFSCE) (2022). Educator preparation framework for family and community partnerships. https://nafsce.org/page/EdPrepFramework
47.
NickelJ.ChadwickJ. (2022). Tutoring to build teacher candidates’ competence as reading teachers. Mentoring & Tutoring, 30(3), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2070990
48.
O’NeilM.ChambersS. (2013). Graduate candidates’ perceptions of the summer reading practicum and its impact on their preparation as reading specialists/literacy coaches. Journal of Reading Education, 39(1), 8–14.
OslickM.LaneH. (2014). Meeting the needs of struggling readers: Using reading assessments in a graduate-level reading course. Action in Teacher Education, 36(5–6), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2014.977754
51.
PearceD. L.GarrettS. D.Grote-GarciaS. A.SchaumA. M. (2007). University-based reading clinics: Perceptions and practices. The Reading Professor, 29(2), 43–48.
52.
PeñaD. (2000). Parent involvement: Influencing factors and implications. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598741
53.
PletcherB.RobertsonP.SullivanM. (2019). A current overview of 10 university-based reading clinics. Reading Horizons, 53(8), 1–22.
54.
PuryearR. (2015). Perceived successful components of the university reading clinic. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 81(4), 92–101.
55.
QarooniN. (2022). Seeing families as partners in literacy growth. Educational Leadership, 80(1), 34–41.
56.
ReyesI.da Silva IddingsA. C.FellerN. (2016). Building relationships with diverse students and families: A funds of knowledge perspective. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(1), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415584692
57.
RiskoV.ReidL. (2019). What really matters for literacy teacher preparation?The Reading Teacher, 72, 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1769
58.
RogersR.BrefeldR. (2015). Parents appraise schools: A study of counter-narratives. Linguistics and Education, 29, 46–58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.11.001
59.
RogersR.DozierC.DeeneyT.EliasM.HugginsS.JorgeL.MsengiS.FerrisA.Chileshe-ChibambaA. (2023). Reimagining family engagement in online literacy clinics during the pandemic. Literary Research: Theory, Method, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377231183736
SargentS.HillN.MorrisonS. (2006). The impact of university reading clinics: Parental perceptions. In SampsonM.SzaboS.Falk-RossF.FooteM.LinderP. (Eds.), Multiple literacies in the 21st century. Twenty-eighth yearbook of the college reading association (pp. 184–197). College Reading Association.
62.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books.
63.
SeidmanI. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research. Teachers College Press.
64.
SleeterC. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teacher and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1947–1957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.04.003
65.
Souto-ManningM.SwickK. J. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs about parent and family involvement: Rethinking our family involvement paradigm. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-006-0063-5
66.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (2008). The basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
67.
TharpR.GallimoreR. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge University Press.
68.
TutenJ.JensenH. (2008). Re-visioning the reading clinic experience: Tutoring at the edge of one’s comfort zone. Journal of Reading Education, 4(1), 25–32.
69.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
