Examining the connections among teacher characteristics, instructional decision-making, and student learning in social studies education are both complicated and contentious. In the current study, we shed light on middle grades social studies teaching and learning—a black hole of research in the subject area. Using data from the National Assessment for Education Progress (NAEP) eighth grade U.S. history assessment, we explore the intersections of eighth grade social studies teachers’ teacher education pathways, instructional, decision-making, and curricular structure on students’ knowledge of history. Results suggest that teachers identified as having a social studies-inclusive teacher education background and who only teach social studies (as opposed to multiple subjects) were associated with higher average student performance on the NAEP exam. Findings have implications for middle grades social studies teacher education and how the subject is organized within middle schools.
AchinsteinB.OgawaR. T.SpieglmanA. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 557–603.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
4.
BartonK. C.AveryP. G. (2016). Research on social studies education: Diverse students, settings, and methods. In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 985–1038). American Educational Research Association.
5.
BartonK. C.LevstikL. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6.
ChikkaturA. (2013). Teaching and learning African American history in a multiracial classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(4), 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2013.838740
7.
Cochran-SmithM.CarneyM. C.KeefeE. S.BurtonS.ChangW.FernándezM. B.MillerA. F.SánchezJ. G.BakerM. (2018). Reclaiming accountability in teacher education. Teachers College Press.
8.
Cochran-SmithM.KeefeE. S.CarneyM. C.SánchezJ. G.OlivoM.SmithR. J. (2020). Teacher preparation at new graduate schools of education: Studying a controversial innovation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 47(2), 8–37.
ConklinH. G. (2008). Promise and problems in two divergent pathways: Preparing social studies teachers for the middle school-level. Theory & Research in Social Education, 36(1), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2008.10473359
12.
ConklinH. G. (2010). Preparing for the educational black hole? Teachers’ learning in two pathways into middle school social studies teaching. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 48–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473416
13.
ConklinH. G. (2011). Company men: Tracing learning from divergent teacher education pathways into practice in middle grades classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111426294
14.
CookC. M.HowellP. B.FaulknerS. A. (2013). Middle level teacher preparation: Principals’ perceptions of new teacher preparedness. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning, 11(11), 11–20.
15.
CroccoM. S.LivingstonE. (2017). Becoming an “expert” social studies teacher. In ManfraM. M.BolickC. M. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 360–384). Wiley.
16.
CubanL. (1982). Persistent instruction: The high school classroom, 1900-1980. Phi Delta Kappan, 64(2), 113–118.
17.
CuencaA. (2014). Negotiating accountability during student teaching: The influence of an inquiry-based student teaching seminar. Teaching Education, 25(1), 24–42.
18.
CuencaA.CastroA. J.BentonB.HostetlerA.HeafnerT. L.ThackerE. (2017). National council for the social studies national standards for the preparation of social studies teachers. National Council for the Social Studies.
19.
Darling-HammondL.ChungR.FrelowF. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053004002
20.
DuhaylongsodL.SnowC. E.SelmanR. L.DonovanM. S. (2015). Toward disciplinary literacy: Dilemmas and challenges in designing history curriculum to support middle school students. Harvard Education Review, 85(4), 587–608.
21.
FaulknerS. A.CookC. M.ThompsonN. L.HowellP. B.RintamaaM. F.MillerN. C. (2017). Mapping the varied terrain of specialized middle level teacher preparation and licensure. Middle School Journal, 48(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2017.1272911
22.
FitchettP. G. (2010). A profile of twenty-first century social studies teachers. Journal of Social Studies Research, 34(2), 229–265.
23.
FitchettP. G.HeafnerT. L. (2017). Student demographics and teacher characteristics as predictors of elementary-age students’ history knowledge: Implications for teacher education and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 79–92.
24.
FitchettP. G.HeafnerT. L.LambertR. G. (2017). An analysis of predictors of history content knowledge: Implications for policy and practice. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(65), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2761
25.
GerwinD.VisoneF. (2006). The freedom to teach: Contrasting teaching in elective and state-tested courses. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(2), 259–282.
26.
GoeL. (2007). The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
27.
GoldhaberD. D.BrewerD. J. (2000). Does certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–145.
28.
GoodladJ. (2004). A place called school (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
GorskiP. C. (2017). Reaching and teaching students in poverty: Strategies for erasing the opportunity gap (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
31.
GrantS. G.SwanK.LeeJ. (2017). Inquiry-based practice in social studies education: Understanding the inquiry design model. Taylor & Francis.
32.
GutiérrezR. (2008). A “Gap-Gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.
33.
HalvorsenA.-L.DukeN. K.BrugarK. A.BlockM. K.StrachanS. L.BerkaM. B.BrownJ. M. (2012). Narrowing the achievement gap in second-grade social studies and content area literacy: The promise of a project-based approach. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(3), 198–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.705954
34.
HarrisL. M.BainR. B. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge for world history teachers: What is it? How might prospective teachers develop It?The Social Studies, 102(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2011.532724
35.
Hernández-RamosP.De La PazS. (2009). Learning history in middle school by designing multimedia in a project-based learning experience. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782545
36.
HessD. E.McAvoyP. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. Routledge.
37.
HiebertJ.MorrisA. K. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111428328
38.
HongH.HamotG. E. (2015). The associations of teacher professional characteristics, school environmental factors, and state testing policy on social studies educators’ instructional authority. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.06.009
39.
HowellP.CookC.FaulknerS. (2013). Effective middle level teaching: Perceptions on the preparedness of newly hired teachers. Middle Grades Research Journal, 8(3), 1–22.
40.
HoxJ. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Taylor and Francis.
41.
IngersollR. M.CollinsG. (2018). The status of teaching as a profession. In BallantineJ.SpadeJ.StuberJ. (Eds.), Schools and society: A sociological approach to education (pp. 199–213). Pine Forge Press/SAGE.
42.
JournellW.WebbA. W. (2013). When one-size methods class doesn’t fit all: A self-study of teaching traditional and alternative licensure students together. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(1), 9–27.
KleinT. (2018). History curriculum, standards, and assessment policies and politics: U.S. experiences. In MetzgerS. A.HarrisL. M. (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 11–36). Wiley.
45.
LauenD. L.TysonK. (2009). Perspectives from the disciplines. In SykesG.SchneiderB.PlankD. N. (Eds.), handbook of education policy research (pp. 71–82). Routledge.
46.
LazerS. (2015). A large-scale assessment of historical knowledge and reasoning. In ErcikanK.SeixasP. (Eds.), New directions in assessing historical thinking (pp. 145–158). Routledge.
47.
LeeV. E.SmithJ. B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66(3), 164–187.
48.
LevinsonM. (2010). The civic empowerment gap: Defining the problem and locating solutions. In SherrodL.Torney-PurtaJ.FlanaganC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement (pp. 331–361). Wiley.
49.
LevstikL. S. (2008). What happens in social studies classrooms? Research on K-12 social studies practice. In LevstikL. S.TysonC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 50–64). Routledge.
50.
LevyB. L. M.ThomasE. E.DragoK.RexL. A. (2013). Examining studies of inquiry-based learning in three fields of education: Sparking generative conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113496430
51.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
52.
MartellC. C. (2013). Race and histories: Examining culturally relevant teaching in the U.S. history classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2013.755745
53.
MartellC. C. (2019). Barriers to inquiry-based instruction: A longitudinal study of history teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 77(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119841880
McEwinC. K.GreeneM. W. (2011). The status of programs and practices in America’s middle schools: Results from two national studies. Association for Middle Level Education.
56.
McPartlandJ. M. (1987). Balancing high quality subject-matter instruction with positive teacher-student relations in the middle Grades: Effects of departmentalization, tracking and block scheduling on learning environments (Report No. 15). US Department of Education.
57.
MojeE. B.SpeyerJ. (2008). The reality of challenging texts in high school science and social studies: How teachers can mediate comprehension. In HinchmanK.Sheridan-ThomasH. (Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (pp. 185–211). The Guilford Press.
58.
Monte-SanoC. (2008). Qualities of historical writing instruction: A comparative case study of two teachers’ practices. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1045–1079.
59.
Monte-SanoC. (2011). Learning to open up history for students: Preservice teachers’ emerging pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 260–272.
60.
Monte-SanoC.CochranM. (2009). Attention to learners, subject, or teaching: What takes precedence as preservice candidates learn to teach historical thinking and reading?Theory & Research in Social Education, 37(1), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2009.10473389
61.
National Council for the Social Studies. (1992). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies.
62.
National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history.
63.
NewmannF. M. (2000). Authentic intellectual work: What and why. Research/Practice, 8(1), 1–5.
64.
ParkerW. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. Teachers College Press.
65.
ParkerW. C.LoJ.YeoA. J.ValenciaS. W.NguyenD.AbbottR. D.. . . VyeN. J. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: Toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1424–1459. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213504237
66.
PowellD. (2017). Brother, can you paradigm? Toward a theory of pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117708553
ReismanA. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
69.
ReismanA.FogoB. (2016). Contributions of educative document-based curricular materials to quality of historical instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.018
70.
ReismanA.KavanaghS. S.Monte-SanoC.FogoB.McGrewS. C.CipparoneP.SimmonsE. (2017). Facilitating whole-class discussions in history: A framework for preparing teacher candidates. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117707463
71.
RockoffJ. E.JacobB. A.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2010). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one?Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00022
72.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813
SayeJ., & Social Studies Inquiry Research Collaborative. (2013). Authentic pedagogy: Its presence in social studies classrooms and relationship to student performance on state-mandated tests. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(1), 89–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2013.756785
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
77.
SmithJ.NiemiR. G. (2001). Learning history in school: The impact of coursework and instructional practices on achievement. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29(1), 18–42.
78.
SmithM. D. (2017). Cognitive validity: Can multiple-choice items tap historical thinking processes?American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1256–1287. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217717949
79.
StrachanS. L. (2015). Kindergarten students’ social studies and content literacy learning from interactive read-alouds. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(4), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.08.003
80.
SwanK.HoferM. (2013). Examining student-created documentaries as a mechanism for engaging students in authentic intellectual work. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(1), 133–175.
81.
ThorntonS. J.BartonK. C. (2010). Can history stand alone? Drawbacks and blind spots of a “disciplinary” curriculum. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2471–2495.
82.
VanSledrightB. (2011). The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policy. Routledge.
83.
VaughnS.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.WanzekJ.Stillman-SpisakS. J.SolisM.SimmonsD. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93.
84.
WangA. H. (2010). Optimizing early mathematics experiences for children from low-income families: A study on opportunity to learn mathematics. Childhood Education Journal, 37(4), 295–302.
85.
WenglinskyH. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12), 1–30.
86.
WillsJ. S. (2007). Putting the squeeze on social studies: Managing teaching dilemmas in subject areas excluded from testing. Teachers College Record, 109(8), 1980–2046.
87.
WilsonS. M.WineburgS. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525–539.
88.
WineburgS. (2010). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(4), 81–94.
89.
WoodsonA. N. (2016). We’re just ordinary people: Messianic master narratives and black youths’ civic agency. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(2), 184–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1170645
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
