A range of social studies interventions have been researched to support students’ learning and improve teachers’ instruction. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of these interventions on secondary students’ learning. A systematic literature search identified 68 studies with 77 independent samples and 146 effect sizes for students in Grades 6 to 12. Using random-effects robust variance estimation (RVE), we found that social studies interventions had a positive, medium effect size (g = .54) on student learning outcomes. Moderator analyses examined factors like grade level, domain, implementer, intervention duration, measured constructs, publication type, and study quality. Results showed greater effectiveness for content acquisition (g = .58) and social studies writing (g = .58) than for reading comprehension (g = .05). Except for measured constructs, other moderators were not significant. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
*AbdulRaheemY.BelloM. B.OdutayoA. O. (2018). In search of a more effective strategy: Using the 5E instructional strategy to teach civic education in senior secondary schools in Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of International Social Studies, 8(1), 62–85. https://uilsspace.unilorin.edu.ng/handle/20.500.12484/5496
2.
*AkpinarY. (2014). Different modes of digital learning object use in school settings: Do we design for individual or collaborative learning?International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 10(3), 87–95. Retrieved from https://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1747
3.
*AlajmiM. M. (2021). The effect of blended learning on the degree of students’ acquisition of geography skills for the eleventh level at the secondary stage in Kuwait. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(4), 93–120. Retrieved from https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/3625
4.
*AlmelwethH. (2022). The effectiveness of a proposed strategy for teaching geography through artificial intelligence applications in developing secondary school students’ higher-order thinking skills and achievement. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.18
5.
*AriësR. J.GhyselsJ.GrootW.Maassen van den BrinkH. (2016). Combined working memory capacity and reasoning strategy training improves reasoning skills in secondary social studies education: Evidence from an experimental study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.008
6.
*BaharevZ. (2016). The effects of Cornell note-taking and review strategies on recall and comprehension of lecture content for middle school students with and without disabilities [Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New Jersey]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
7.
*BasantiaT. K.PandaB. N.SahooD. (2012). MAI (Multi-Dimensional Activity Based Integrated Approach): A strategy for cognitive development of the learners at the elementary stage. US-China Education Review B, 1, 68–81. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531670.pdf
8.
BeckD.EnoJ. (2012). Signature pedagogy: A literature review of social studies and technology research. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.658347
9.
*BednarzS. W. (1992). The effect of mnemonics and attention-enhancing techniques on learning place geography [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
*BerkeleyS.MarshakL.MastropieriM. A. (2011). Improving student comprehension of social studies text: A self-questioning strategy for inclusive middle school classes. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361261
12.
*BerkeleyS.RiccominiP. J. (2013). QRAC-the-Code: A comprehension monitoring strategy for middle school social studies textbooks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411409412
13.
*BoonR. T.BurkeM. D.ForeC.IIIHagan-BurkeS. (2006). Improving student content knowledge in inclusive social studies classrooms using technology-based cognitive organizers: A systematic replication. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4(1), 1–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ797677.pdf
14.
*BoonR. T.BurkeM. D.ForeC.III.SpencerV. G. (2005). The impact of cognitive organizers and technology-based practices on student success in secondary social studies classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340602100101
15.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
16.
*BowerB. J. (1990). The effect of a multiple-ability treatment on status and learning in the cooperative social studies classroom [Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
17.
BrushT.SayeJ. (2014). An instructional model to support problem-based historical inquiry: The persistent issues in history network. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1409
18.
*CantrellR. J.FusaroJ. A.DoughertyE. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A comparative study. Reading Psychology, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/027027100278310
19.
*CashT. (2013). The effect of reciprocal mapping on high-risk sixth-grade students’ social studies achievement [Doctoral dissertation, Florida International university]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
20.
*CenerE.AcunI.DemirhanG. (2015). The Impact of ICT on pupils’ achievement and attitudes in social studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.67856
21.
*ChangS. J. (1987). An application of schema theory to school learning: Learning geography with the help of a notetaking schema [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
22.
*CheeY. S.MehrotraS.LiuQ. (2013). Effective game based citizenship education in the age of new media. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 11(1), 16–28. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1653
23.
CiulloS.CollinsA.WissingerD. R.McKennaJ. W.LoY.-L.OsmanD. (2020). Students with learning disabilities in the social studies: A meta-analysis of intervention research. Exceptional Children, 86(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919893932
24.
CleggA. A. (1991). Games and simulations in social studies education. In ShaverJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 523–528). Macmillan.
25.
*CloutierA. R. (2013). The effects of thematic social studies instruction on eighth grade students’ historical reasoning ability and attitudes towards social studies related tasks [Doctoral dissertation, Western Connecticut State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
26.
DackH.van HoverS.HicksD. (2016). “Try not to giggle if you can help it”: The implementation of experiential instructional techniques in social studies classrooms. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.04.002
27.
*DeLaPazS. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
28.
De La PazS.FeltonM.Monte-SanoC.CroningerR.JacksonC.DeograciasJ. S.HoffmanB. P. (2014). Developing historical reading and writing with adolescent readers: Effects on student learning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(2), 228–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.908754
29.
*De La PazS.FeltonM. K. (2010). Reading and writing from multiple source documents in history: Effects of strategy instruction with low to average high school writers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.001
30.
*De La PazS.Monte-SanoC.FeltonM.CroningerR.JacksonC.PiantedosiK. W. (2017). A historical writing apprenticeship for adolescents: Integrating disciplinary learning with cognitive strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.147
31.
*De La PazS.WissingerD. R.GrossM.ButlerC. (2022). Strategies that promote historical reasoning and contextualization: A pilot intervention with urban high school students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 35(2), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10183-0
32.
DiCamilloL.GradwellJ. M. (2013). To simulate or not to simulate? Investigating myths about social studies simulations. The Social Studies, 104(4), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2012.716094
33.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529
34.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMI, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
35.
ElbroC.Buch-IversenI. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
36.
EllemanA. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
37.
*FaberJ. E.MorrisJ. D.LiebermanM. G. (2000). The effect of note taking on ninth grade students’ comprehension. Reading Psychology, 21(3), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050144377
38.
FallaceT. (2017). The intellectual history of the social studies. In ManfraM. G.BolickM. (Eds.). The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 42–67). Wiley & Sons.
39.
*FeldhausenM. W. (1985). The effects of computer review assistance modules (cram) on student achievement in United States history [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
GarwoodJ. D.McKennaJ. W.RobertsG. J.CiulloS.ShinM. (2021). Social studies content knowledge interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 45(1), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519834622
43.
*GerstenR.BakerS. K.Smith-JohnsonJ. (2006). Eyes on the prize: Teaching complex historical content to middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200301
44.
GillespieA.GrahamS.KiuharaS.HebertM. (2014). High school teachers’ use of writing to support students’ learning: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27, 1043–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9494-8
45.
*GosséM. C. (1993). Effects of combining two types of prereading instruction on the comprehension and retention of reading materials in the social studies classroom [Doctoral dissertation, Temple University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
46.
GrahamS.KiuharaS. A.MacKayM. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744
47.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
48.
GuthrieJ. T.WigfieldA. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In KamilM.MosenthalP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
HallC.RobertsG. J.ChoE.McCulleyL. V.CarrollM.VaughnS. (2017). Reading instruction for English learners in the middle grades: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 763–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9372-4
50.
*HarrellS. J. (2018). The influence of a theory based US history curriculum on student content knowledge, student historical interpretation skills, and student self efficacy for historical inquiry [Doctoral dissertation, College of William and Mary, Virginia]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
51.
HashR. J. (1974). The effects of a strategy of structured overviews, levels guides and vocabulary exercises on student achievement, reading comprehension, critical thinking and attitudes of junior high school classes in social studies [Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
52.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
53.
HicksD.van HoverS.DoolittleP. E.VanFossenP. (2012). Learning social studies: An evidence-based approach. In HarrisK. R.GrahamS.UrdanT.BusA. G.MajorS.SwansonH. L. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 3: Application to learning and teaching (pp. 283–307). American Psychological Association.
54.
*HigginsB. A. (2000). An analysis of the effects of integrated instruction of metacognitive and study skills upon the self-efficacy and achievement of male and female students [Master’s research project, Miami University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
55.
*HilbrinkD. A. (2015). The effect of an instructional intervention grounded in the four resources model on social studies content knowledge [Doctoral Dissertation, Cardinal Stritch University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
56.
*HollidayD. C. (1995). The effects of the cooperative learning strategy Jigsaw II on academic achievement and cross-race relationships in a secondary social studies classroom [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Southern Mississippi]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
57.
HolstermannN.GrubeD.BögeholzS. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40, 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0
58.
HwangH.CabellS. Q.JoynerR. E. (2022). Effects of integrated literacy and content-area instruction on vocabulary and comprehension in the elementary years: A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(3), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1954005
59.
*IhleF. M. (2012). Using language knowledge to comprehend academic discourse [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
60.
*JongM. S.ChenG.TamV.ChaiC. S. (2019). Adoption of flipped learning in social humanities education: The FIBER experience in secondary schools. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1222–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1561473
61.
*KarkdijkJ.Van der ScheeJ.AdmiraalW. (2013). Effects of teaching with mysteries on students’ geographical thinking skills. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 22(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.817664
62.
KentS. C.WanzekJ.MartinezL. (2018). The application of empirically supported practices in middle school social studies classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517744662
63.
*KingsleyK. V.BooneR. (2008). Effects of multimedia software on achievement of middle school students in an American history class. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782529
64.
KolbA.KolbD. (2018). Eight important things to know about the experiential learning cycle. Australian Educational Leader, 40(3), 8–14.
65.
KolbD. A. (1984) Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
66.
*KonopakB. C.MartinS. H.MartinM. A. (1990). Using a writing strategy to enhance sixth-grade students’ comprehension of content material. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969009547692
67.
*KostersA. E. (1991). The effects of cooperative learning in the traditional classroom on student achievement and attitude [Doctoral dissertation, The University of South Dakota]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
68.
LévesqueS. (2008). Thinking historically: Educating students for the 21st century. University of Toronto Press.
69.
*LiaoY. H.KungW. C.ChenH. C. (2019). Testing the effectiveness of creative map mnemonic strategies in a geography class. Instructional Science, 47(5), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09494-1
70.
*LikenP. K. (2009). Museum objects in the secondary classroom: A comparison of visual and tactile aids to learning [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
71.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis (Vol. 49). Sage Publications.
72.
*MartosJ. E. (2016). Visualizing historic space through the integration of geographic information science in secondary school curriculums: A comparison of static versus dynamic methods [Master’s thesis, University of Southern California]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
73.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (1989). Constructing more meaningful relationships: Mnemonic instruction for special populations. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01326638
74.
*MetoyerS.BednarzR. (2017). Spatial thinking assists geographic thinking: Evidence from a study exploring the effects of geospatial technology. Journal of Geography, 116(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2016.1175495
75.
McCulleyL. V.OsmanD. J. (2015). Effects of reading instruction on learning outcomes in social studies: A synthesis of quantitative research. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(4), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.06.002
76.
*NajmuldeenH. A. (2017). The impact of educational games-based iPad applications on the development of social studies achievement and learning retention among sixth grade students in Jeddah. World Journal of Education, 7(3), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n3p21
National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2013). The college, career, and civic life (c3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Author.
79.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA/CCSSO). (2010). Common core state standards. http://www.corestandards.org/
80.
*NokesJ. D.DoleJ. A.HackerD. J. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.492
81.
*OgheneakokeC. E.ObroS.BenikeJ. (2019). In search of a more effective strategy: Using simulation games instructional strategy for the teaching and learning of social studies in secondary school. Journal of International Social Studies, 9(1), 53–71. https://www.iajiss.org/index.php/iajiss/article/view/369
82.
OzuruY.DempseyK.McNamaraD. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
83.
PengP.WangW.LinL.LiuY.YanX.TanY.ZhangZ.ZhangW.HuangY. (2025). A network meta-analysis of multi-component reading interventions for students with reading difficulties: Active-ingredient vs. ingredient-interaction?Educational Psychology Review, 37(3), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10063-x
84.
*PurghartM. (2010). Changing times: Traditional versus small-group instruction in high school social studies [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine, and University of California, Los Angeles]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
85.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.4) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.Rproject.org
86.
RayA. B.GrahamS.HoustonJ. D.HarrisK. R. (2016). Teachers use of writing to support students’ learning in middle school: A national survey in the United States. Reading and Writing, 29, 1039–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9602-z
87.
*ReismanA. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
88.
*ReynoldsG. A. (2006). Teaching composing from sources to middle grade students [Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
89.
RiceM.WijekumarK. K. (2024). Inference skills for reading: A meta-analysis of instructional practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(4), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000855
90.
*RichardsonR. C. (2009). Expanding geographic understanding in grade 8 social studies classes through integration of geography, music, and history: A quasi-experimental study [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine, and University of California, Los Angeles]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Wiley & Sons.
93.
*SabanciO.KurnazS.YürükN. (2020). The effect of metaconceptual teaching activities on 7th grade students’ understandings of and attitudes towards law related concepts. Turkish Journal of Education, 9(2), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.657698
94.
SadoskiM.PaivioA. (2013). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Routledge.
95.
*SamuelsH. (2019). The impact of a thematic unit and integration on students’ achievement in social studies [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
96.
SayeJ. W. (2017). Disciplined inquiry in social studies classrooms. In ManfraM. G.BolickM. (Eds.). The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 336–359). Wiley & Sons.
97.
SayeJ. W.BrushT. (2007). Using technology-enhanced learning environments to support problem-based historical inquiry in secondary school classrooms. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(2), 196–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2007.10473333
98.
SchoenbachR.GreenleafC. (2009). Fostering adolescents’ engaged academic literacy. In ChristenburyL.BomerR.SmagorinskyP. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 98–112). Guilford Press.
99.
*ScottD. B.DreherM. J. (2022). Helping students “do school”: Examining the impact of understanding text organization on student navigation and comprehension of textbook content. Reading Psychology, 43(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1939819
100.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: An update and research synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016640214368
101.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.BerkeleyS.GraetzJ. E. (2010). Do special education interventions improve learning of secondary content? A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327465
ShawA. K. (2020). Swept away before learning to swim: Social studies subject area literacy for high school students [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
104.
*SinghS. S. B.RathakrishnanB.SharifS.TalinR.EboyO. V. (2016). The effects of Geography Information System (GIS) based teaching on underachieving students’ mastery goal and achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 119–134. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1117621.pdf
105.
*SnowM. S. (1981). The effects of inservice teacher workshops in integrated arts activities on attitudes and achievement in fourth, fifth and sixth grade children pertinent to social studies learnings [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
106.
*SonB. (1992). The comparative effects of problem-solving instruction and conventional expository instruction on students’ acquisition, retention, and structuring of knowledge in high school social studies [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
107.
SwansonE.HairrellA.KentS.CiulloS.WanzekJ. A.VaughnS. (2014). A synthesis and meta-analysis of reading interventions using social studies content for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412451131
108.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.McCulleyL.Stillman-SpisakS.VaughnS.SimmonsD.FogartyM.HairrellA. (2016). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.910718
109.
*SwansonE.WanzekJ.VaughnS.FallA.-M.RobertsG.HallC.MillerV. L. (2017). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below-average readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1072068
110.
*TsaiM.-N.LiaoY.-F.ChangY.-L.ChenH.-C. (2020). A brainstorming flipped classroom approach for improving students’ learning performance, motivation, teacher-student interaction and creativity in a civics education class. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100747
111.
*Van der ScheeJ.LeatD.VankanL. (2006). Effects of the use of thinking through geography strategies. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.2167/irgee190.0
112.
Van HoverS.HicksD. (2017). Social constructivism and student learning in social studies. In ManfraM. G.BolickM. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 270–286). Wiley & Sons.
113.
VanSledrightB. (2010). The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.039
114.
VanSledrightB.LimónM. (2006). Learning and teaching social studies: A review of cognitive research in history and geography. In AlexanderP. A.WinneP. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 545–570). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
115.
*VaughnS.FallA.-M.RobertsG.WanzekJ.SwansonE.MartinezL. R. (2019). Class percentage of students with reading difficulties on content knowledge and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775117
116.
*VaughnS.MartinezL.WanzekJ.RobertsG.SwansonE.FallA. (2017). Improving content knowledge and comprehension for English language learners: Findings from a randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1). 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000069
117.
*VaughnS.RobertsG.SwansonE.WanzekJ.FallA.Stillman-SpisakS. (2015). Improving middle-school students’ knowledge and comprehension in social studies: A replication. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9274-2
118.
VaughnS.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.WanzekJ.Stillman-SpisakS. J.SolisM.SimmonsD. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.039
119.
*WanzekJ.KentS. C.VaughnS.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.HaynesM. (2015). Implementing team-based learning in middle school social studies classes. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.893224
120.
*WanzekJ.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.VaughnS.KentS. C. (2015). Promoting acceleration of comprehension and content through text in high school social studies classes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.906011
121.
*WatsonK. L.LawsonM. J. (1995). Improving access to knowledge: The effect of strategy training for question answering in high school geography. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01134.x
122.
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook (Version 5.0). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
123.
*WilliamsE. F. (2002). Using guided cooperative questioning to foster comprehension of expository text in a middle-school social-studies classroom [Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
124.
WineburgS. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
125.
WineburgS. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Temple University Press.
126.
WineburgS. S.MartinD.Monte-SanoC. (2012). Reading like a historian: Teaching literacy in middle and high school history classrooms. Teachers College Press.
127.
*WissingerD. R. (2012). Using argumentative discussions to enhance the written arguments of middle school students in social studies classrooms [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
128.
*YilmazM. A.KarakusU. (2018). The impact of place based education approach on student achievement in social studies. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(3), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.505261
129.
*ZirkleD. M. (2009). Long-term potentiation principles to form an optimal repetition schedule [Doctoral dissertation, Seattle Pacific University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
