An instructional vision is the discourse that teachers or others currently employ to characterize the kind of “ideal classroom practice” to which they aspire but have not yet necessarily mastered. In mathematics education, prior work has demonstrated relations between teachers’ instructional vision and a variety of aspects of their classroom practice and professional pursuits. We examined what might contribute to teachers’ development of mathematics instructional visions through a quantitative analysis of a longitudinal data set collected in four urban school districts. Controlling for instructional vision in the prior year, we found middle school mathematics teachers’ current instructional vision to be related to their prior mathematical knowledge for teaching, their prior instructional practice, and their colleagues’ prior instructional visions—with the strength of the relation depending on the density of teachers’ advice networks. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for both inservice teacher professional development and preservice teacher education.
ArbaughF.FreeburnB.KonukN.GraysayD. (2016, April). Unintended (but good!) outcomes: Impacting PSTs’ vision of role of teacher [Conference session]. Annual Research Conference of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Francisco, CA, United States.
2.
BallD. L. (1988). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter knowledge part of the equation (Research Report 88–2). Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
3.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.
4.
BallD. L.SleepL.BoerstT.BassH. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.
5.
BannisterN. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 347–372.
6.
BannisterN. A. (2018). Research commentary: Theorizing collaborative mathematics teacher learning in communities of practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 125–139.
7.
BaumertJ.KunterM.BlumW.BrunnerM.VossT.JordanA.. . . TsaiY. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
8.
BostonM. (2012). Assessing instructional quality in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 76–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/666387
9.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press.
10.
CarpenterJ. P.KrutkaD. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434.
11.
CobbP.McClainK.LambergT.d DeanC. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.
12.
CobbP.SmithT. (2008). District development as a means of improving mathematics teaching and learning at scale. In KrainerK.WoodsT. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 3. Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities, and networks (pp. 231–254). Sense Publishers.
13.
CobbP.WoodT.YackelE.McNealB. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 573–604.
14.
Copur-GencturkY. (2015). The effects of changes in mathematical knowledge on teaching: A longitudinal study of teachers’ knowledge and instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 280–330.
15.
DavisE. A.KrajcikJ. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
16.
de AraujoZ. (2017). Connections between secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs and their selection of tasks for English language learners. Curriculum Inquiry, 47(4), 363–389.
17.
DepaepeF.VerschaffelL.KelchtermansG. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12–25.
18.
FairbanksC. M.DuffyG. G.FairclothB. S.HeY.LevinB.RohrJ.SteinC. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 161–171.
19.
FenstermacherG. D. (1978). 4: A Philosophical Consideration of Recent Research on Teacher Effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 6(1), 157–185.
20.
FrankK. A.LoY.SunM. (2014). Social network analysis of the influences of educational reforms on teachers’ practices and interactions. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(3), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0554-x
21.
FrankT. J.KhalilD.ScatesB.OdomsS. (2018). Listening to and learning with Black teachers of mathematics. In GoffneyI.GutiérrezR. (Eds.), Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students (pp. 147–158). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
22.
GatesP. (2006). Going beyond belief systems: Exploring a model for the social influence on mathematics teacher beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 347–369.
23.
GougenJ. A.LindeC. (1993). Techniques for requirements elicitation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (pp. 152–164). IEEE.
24.
GrossmanP. L.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal March, 45(1), 184–205.
25.
GrossmanP. L.SmagorinskyP.ValenciaS. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1–29.
26.
GrossmanP. L.WineburgS.WoolworthS. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.
27.
HainesC. (2020). “I can’t believe I just said that”: Discursive filters and beginning mathematics teachers’ enactment of ambitious practice [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri.
28.
HallS. (1986). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 28–44.
29.
HammernessK. (2001). Teacher’s visions: The role of personal ideals in school reform. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 143–163.
30.
HammernessK. (2004). Teaching with vision: How one teacher negotiates the tension between high ideals and standardized testing. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(4), 33–43.
31.
HammernessK. (2008). “If you don’t know where you are going, any path will do”: The role of teachers’ visions in teachers’ career paths. The New Educator, 4(1), 1–22.
32.
HatchT.GrossmanP. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation: Using technology to examine teaching (Overview for a digital exhibition: Learning from the practice of teaching). Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70–85.
33.
HiebertJ. (2013). The constantly underestimated challenge of improving mathematics instruction. In LeathamK. R. (Ed.), Vital directions for mathematics education research (pp. 45–56). Springer.
34.
HiebertJ.GrouwsD. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In LesterF. K.Jr., (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.
35.
HillH. C. (2007). Mathematical knowledge of middle school teachers: Implications for the No Child Left Behind policy initiative. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373707301711
36.
HillH. C.BallD. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 330–351.
37.
HillH. C.SchillingS. G.BallD. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.
38.
HodgeA. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ changing visions of themselves as reform-oriented teachers. Current Issues in Education, 13(4), 1–19. http://cie.asu.edu/
39.
HornI. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79.
40.
HornI. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112, 225–259.
41.
HornI. S.KaneB. D. (2015). Opportunities for professional learning in mathematics teacher workgroup conversations: Relationships to instructional expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 373–418.
42.
JacksonC.DelaneyA. (2020). Shifting toward productive beliefs for black students in the mathematics classroom. In StackiS. L.CaskeyM. M.MertensS. B. (Eds.), Curriculum, instruction, and assessment: Intersecting new needs and new approaches (pp. 185–222). Information Age Publishing.
43.
JacksonK.GibbonsL.SharpeC. J. (2017). Teachers’ views of students’ mathematical capabilities: Challenges and possibilities for ambitious reform. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–43.
44.
JansenA.GallivanH. R.MillerE. (2020). Early-career teachers’ instructional visions for mathematics teaching: Impact of elementary teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(2), 183–207.
45.
KazemiE.HubbardA. (2008). New directions for the design and study of professional development: Attending to the coevolution of teachers’ participation across contexts. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 428–441.
46.
LampertM. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1/2), 21–34.
47.
LappanG.FeyJ. T.FitzgeraldW. M.FrielS. N.PhillipsE. D. (1998). Connected mathematics project. Seymour.
48.
LeathamK. R. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 91–102.
49.
LortieD. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
50.
LouieN. L. (2018). Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 55–69.
51.
MehanH. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
52.
MunterC. (2014). Developing visions of high-quality mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), 584–635.
53.
MunterC. (2015). Envisioning the role of the mathematics teacher. NCSM Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 16(1), 29–40.
54.
MunterC.CorrentiR. (2017). Examining relations between mathematics teachers’ instructional vision and knowledge and change in practice. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 171–202.
55.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
56.
NesporJ. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.
57.
PenuelW. R.FrankK. A.SunM.KimC. M.SingletonC. (2013). The organization as a filter of institutional diffusion. Teachers College Record, 115(1), 1–33.
58.
PhilippR. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In LesterF. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
59.
PhilippR. A.AmbroseR.LambL. L.SowderJ. T.SchappelleB. P.SowderL.. . . ChauvotJ. (2007). Effects of early field experiences on the mathematical content knowledge and beliefs of prospective elementary school teachers: An experimental study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 438–476.
60.
PittsV.SpillaneJ. P. (2009). Using social network methods to study school leaderships. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 32(2), 185–207.
61.
ResnickL. B.HallM. W. (2001). The principles of learning: Study tools for educators [CD-ROM, Version 2.0]. Learning Research and Development Center, Institute for Learning. https://www.instituteforlearninginnovation.org/
62.
RooneyE. (2015). “I’m just going through the motions”: High-stakes accountability and teachers’ access to intrinsic rewards. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 475–500.
63.
RousseauC.TateW. F. (2003). No time like the present: Reflecting on equity in school mathematics. Theory into Practice, 42(3), 210–216.
64.
SaxeG. B.GearhartM.FrankeM. L.HowardS.CrockettM. (1999). Teachers’ shifting assessment practices in the context of educational reform in mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(1), 85–105.
65.
ScottJ. (2013). Social network analysis (3rd ed.). SAGE.
66.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
67.
SmithM. S.SteinM. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344–350.
68.
SpillaneJ. P.HopkinsM.SweetT. (2018). School district educational infrastructure and change at scale: Teacher peer interactions and their beliefs about mathematics instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 532–571.
69.
StangorC.JhangianiR.TarryH. (2017). Principles of social psychology (1st International ed.). Open Textbook Project.
70.
StiglerJ. W.HiebertJ. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. The Free Press.
71.
ThompsonJ.WindschitlM.BraatenM. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615.
72.
WalkowiakT. A.LeeC. W.WhiteheadA. (2015, April). The development of preservice teachers’ visions of mathematics instruction [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Boston, MA, United States.
73.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge University Press.
74.
WertschJ. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
75.
WertschJ. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
76.
WilhelmA. G. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ enactment of cognitively demanding tasks: Investigating links to teachers’ knowledge and conceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), 636–674.
77.
WilhelmA. G.MunterC.JacksonK. (2017). Examining relations between teachers’ diagnoses of sources of students’ difficulty in mathematics and students’ opportunities to learn. Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 345–370.
78.
WonsavageF. P.McCullochA.WilsonP. H. (2018, February). Designing for organizational sensemaking of mathematics standards at scale. In Redmond-SanogoA.CribbsJ. (Eds.), Proceedings for the 46th Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematics Learning (pp. 181–188). Research Council on Mathematics Learning.
79.
ZhaoQ.CobbP. (2006, November). Articulating the relation between teachers’ learning in professional development and their practice in the classroom: Implications for design research. In Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 457–463). Psychology of Mathematics Education.
