This study examined preservice teachers’ (PSTs) capacity to create mathematical modeling problems (MMPs) for grades 1 to 3. PSTs created MMPs for their choice of grade level and aligned the mathematical content of their MMPs with the relevant mathematics curriculum. PSTs were given criteria adapted from Galbraith’s MMP design principles to guide their work. These criteria were then used to evaluate the resulting MMPs, leading to findings and implications relevant to two areas—mathematics teacher education, and the design and evaluation of MMPs for young children. Results highlight an inclination toward creating problems for higher grade levels as well as concerns regarding both the PSTs’ proficiency with the curriculum content and their capacity to create MMPs for particular content areas. Findings contribute to an important international conversation about the need for further research and development of resources aimed at supporting the integration of mathematical modeling in early childhood mathematics education.
BallD.ForzaniF. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511.
2.
BallD.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 387-407.
3.
CaiJ.HwangS.JiangC.SilberS. (2015). Problem-posing research in Mathematics Education: Some answered and unanswered questions. In SingerF. M.EllertonN. F.CaiJ. (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: From research to practice (pp. 3-34). New York, NY: Springer.
4.
CrespoS. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 243-270.
5.
CrespoS. (2015). A collection of problem-posing experiences for prospective teachers that make a difference. In SingerF.EllertonN.CaiJ. (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 494-512). New York, NY: Springer.
6.
CrespoS.SinclairN. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395-415.
7.
DoerrH.LeshR. (2011). Models and modelling perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics in the twenty-first century. In KaiserG.BlumW.Borromeo FerriR.StillmanG. (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 247-268). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
8.
EllertonN. (2015). Problem posing as an integral part of the mathematics curriculum: A study with prospective and practicing middle-school teachers. In SingerF.EllertonN.CaiJ. (Eds.), Problem posing in mathematics: From research to effective practice (pp. 513-546). New York, NY: Springer.
9.
EnglishL. (2006). Mathematical modeling in the primary school: Children’s construction of a consumer guide. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 303-323.
10.
EnglishL.WattersJ. (2004). Mathematical modelling in the early school years. In SriramanB.FreimanV.Lirette-PitreN. (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity, creativity and learning (pp. 233-247). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
11.
FoxJ. (2006). A justification for mathematical modelling experiences in the preparatory classroom. In GrootenboerP.ZevenbergenR.ChinnappanM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 221-228). Canberra, Australia: MERGA.
12.
FrankeM.KazemiE. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics: Focus on student thinking. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 102-109.
13.
GalbraithP. (2007). Dreaming a “possible dream”: More windmills to conquer. In HainesC.GalbraithP.BlumW.KhanS. (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economics (pp. 44-62). Chichester, UK: Horwood.
14.
GarciaF.MaaßK.WakeG. (2009, July). Modelling and formative assessment pedagogies mediating change in actions. Presented at the 14th International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modeling and Applications (ICTMA14) in Hamburg, Germany.
15.
GarciaF. J.Ruiz-HiguerasL. (2011). Modifying teachers’ practices: The case of a European training course on modelling and applications. In KaiserG.BlumW.Borromeo FerriR.StillmanG. (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 569-578). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
16.
GarciaF. J.Ruiz-HiguerasL. (2010, January). Exploring the use of theoretical frameworks for modelling-oriented instructional design. Presented at the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME) in Lyon, France.
17.
GrundmeierT. (2015). Developing the problem-posing abilities of prospective elementary and middle school teachers. In SingerF.EllertonN.CaiJ. (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 411-432). New York, NY: Springer.
18.
HenningsenM.SteinM. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 534-549.
19.
HošpesovàA.TichàM. (2015). Problem posing in primary school teacher training. In SingerF.EllertonN.CaiJ. (Eds.), Problem posing in mathematics: From research to effective practice (pp. 433-448). New York, NY: Springer.
20.
KlinshternM.KoichuB.BermanA. (2015). What do high school teachers mean by saying: “I pose my own problems.” In SingerF.EllertonN.CaiJ. (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 449-467). New York, NY: Springer.
21.
KuntzeS. (2011). In-service and prospective teachers’ views about modelling tasks in the mathematics classroom—Results of a quantitative empirical study. In KaiserG.BlumW.Borromeo FerriR.StillmanG. (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 279-288). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
22.
LavyI.ShrikiA. (2007). Problem posing as a means for developing mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers. In WooJ.LewH.ParkS.SeoD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 129-136). Seoul, South Korea: PME.
23.
LeshR.DoerrH. (2003). Foundations of a model and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning and problem solving. In LeshR.DoerrH. (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics, problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 337-358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
LeshR.HooverM.HoleB.KellyA.PostT. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In LeshR.KellyA. (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-645). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
MaaßK.GurlittJ. (2011). LEMA: Professional development of teachers in relation to mathematical modelling. In KaiserG.BlumW.Borromeo FerriR.StillmanG. (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 629-640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
26.
MousoulidesN.EnglishL. (2011). Engineering model-eliciting activities for elementary school students. In KaiserG.BlumW.Borromeo FerriR.StillmanG. (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. ICTMA 14 (Vol. 1, pp. 221-230). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
27.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2003). Programme for International Student Assessment: The PISA 2003 assessment framework. Paris, France: Author.
29.
OsanaH.PelczerI. (2015). A review on problem posing in teacher education. In SingerF.EllertonN.CaiJ. (Eds.), Problem posing in mathematics: From research to effective practice (pp. 469-492). New York, NY: Springer.
30.
OsanaH.RoyeaD. (2011). Obstacles and challenges in preservice teachers’ explorations with fractions. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 30, 333-352.
31.
PaolucciC. (2015). Changing perspectives: Examining the potential for advanced mathematical studies to influence pre-service teachers’ beliefs about mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 97-107.
32.
RosliR.CapraroM.GoldsbyD.GonzalezyGonzalezE.OnwuegbuzieA.CapraroR. (2015). Middle grade preservice teachers’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. In SingerF.EllertonN.CaiJ. (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 333-354). New York, NY: Springer.
33.
SilverE. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28.
34.
SingerF.VoicaC. (2013). A problem-solving conceptual framework and its implications for designing problem-posing tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 9-26.
35.
SteinM.SmithM.HenningsenM.SilverE. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36.
TichàM.HošpesovàA. (2010, January). Problem posing and development of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service teacher training. Presented at the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME) in Lyon, France.
37.
UsiskinZ. (1997). Doing algebra in grades K-4. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3(6), 346-356.
38.
UsiskinZ. (2007). The arithmetic operations as mathematical models. In GalbraithP.HennH.-W.NissM. (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education. The 14th ICMI study (Vol. 10, pp. 257-264). New York, NY: Springer.
39.
VaccN. (1993). Questioning in the mathematics classroom. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(2), 88-91.
40.
VosP. (2011). Theoretical and curricular reflections on mathematical modelling: Overview. In KaiserG.BlumW.Borromeo FerriR.StillmanG. (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 665-668). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
