Teacher educators have a challenging task of designing opportunities for preservice teachers (PSTs) to learn ambitious science teaching (AST). However, with limited time in methods courses and the complexities of AST, opportunities for PSTs to “try out” ambitious instruction are difficult to construct and analyze. To address this problem, we describe our enactment of a type of extended pedagogical rehearsal that we call “macroteaching” in a secondary science methods course. Framed as a design experiment, we codeveloped macroteaching with the PSTs during methods class, examining how we all learned about AST given the extended learning opportunity. The results of this study, including that PSTs are not afraid of the uncertainty about what students might say and do, suggest that extended rehearsals of AST provide PSTs and the course instructors with opportunities to advance their teaching and vision of the profession in a methods class.
AllenD. W. (1966). Microteaching: A description. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
2.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach, and connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17-21, 38-39.
3.
BushR. N. (Ed.). (1968). Microteaching: A description. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
4.
CobbP.JacksonK. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 6-33.
5.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
6.
EngleR. A.ConantF. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners’ classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
7.
FennemaE.FrankeM. L.CarpenterT. P.CareyD. A. (1993). Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 555-583.
8.
ForzaniF. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357-368.
9.
GhousseiniH. (2015). Core practices and problems of practice in learning to lead classroom discussions. The Elementary School Journal, 115(3), 334-357.
10.
GoodwinA. L.SmithL.Souto-ManningM.CheruvuR.TanM. Y.ReedR.TaverasL. (2014). What should teacher educators know and be able to do? Perspectives from practicing teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 284-302.
11.
GotwalsA. W.BirminghamD. (2016). Eliciting, identifying, interpreting and responding to students’ ideas: Teacher candidates’ growth in formative assessment practices. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 365-388.
12.
GreenoJ. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79-96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD.RonfeldtM.ShahanE.WilliamsonP. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional study. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055-2100.
14.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289.
15.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
16.
HornI. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37-79.
17.
HornI. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225-259.
18.
HornI. S.CampbellS. S. (2015). Developing pedagogical judgment in novice teachers: mediated field experience as a pedagogy for teacher education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(2), 149-176.
19.
KazemiE.FrankeM.LampertM. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. In HunterR.BicknellB.BurgessT. (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australiasia (Vol. 1, pp. 11-21). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.
20.
KazemiE.GhousseiniH.CunardA.TurrouA. C. (2016). Getting inside rehearsals: Insights from teacher educators to support work on complex practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 18-31.
21.
KennedyM. M. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 54-86). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
22.
LampertM. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1), 21–34.
23.
LampertM.BeasleyH.GhousseiniH.KazemiE.FrankeM. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In SteinM.K.KucanL. (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 129-141). Boston, MA: Springer.
24.
LampertM.FrankeM. L.KazemiE.GhousseiniH.TurrouA. C.BeasleyH.. . . CroweK. (2014). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226-243.
25.
LampertM.GrazianiF. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491-509.
26.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LehrerR.SchaubleL. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In DamonW.LernerR.Anne RenningerK.SigelI. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Sixth Edition, Volume Four: Child psychology in practice (pp. 153-196). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
LittleJ. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913-945.
30.
LortieD. C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
MacLeodG. (1987). Chapter 2. Microteaching: End of a research era?International Journal of Educational Research, 11(5), 531-541.
32.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378-386.
33.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
MetzK. E. (2004). Children’s understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 219-290.
35.
PattonM. Q. (2003). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
PenuelW.FishmanB.ChengB. H.SabelliN. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Education Researcher, 40, 331-337.
37.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
RoseberyA. S.OgonowskiM.DiSchinoM.WarrenB. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322-357.
39.
SherinM. G.JacobsV. R.PhilippR. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
Singer-GabellaM. (2012). Toward scholarship in practice. Teachers College Record, 114(8), 1-30.
41.
StroupeD. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98, 487-516.
42.
StroupeD. (2016). Beginning teachers’ use of resources to enact and learn from ambitious instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 34(1), 51-77.
43.
SunJ.van EsE. A. (2015). An exploratory study of the influence that analyzing teaching has on preservice teachers’ classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 201-214.
44.
TekkumruM.SteinM. K. (2015). Learning to see teaching in new ways: A foundation for maintaining cognitive demand. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 105-136.
45.
ThompsonJ.WindschitlM.BraatenM. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574-615.
46.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why?. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311–1360.
48.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM.StroupeD. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878-903.
49.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99.
50.
ZeichnerK. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376-382.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
