Amid calls for more practice-based teacher education, this article presents a concrete illustration of a practice-based bridging strategy for preparing high school biology teachers to enact open-inquiry labs. Open-inquiry labs were considered a core practice frame that served as a context for identifying core practices and for giving coherence to separate components of the approach to labs. A bridging model was developed in which the teaching practices, understandings, and intentions of 31 biology student teachers were elicited with respect to their current lab segments, and these were compared with the concrete segments of the core practice frame. From this analysis, a progression was developed to support prospective teachers in moving from existing conceptions of appropriate practice to a realization of the new practice frame as a better way to achieve valued goals.
BallD. L.CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice based theory of professional education. In SykesG.Darling-HammondL. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
2.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511.
3.
ChinnC. A.MalhotraB. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
4.
Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
CornoL. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43, 61-73.
6.
DoyleW.PonderG. (1977). The ethic of practicality in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8, 1-12.
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD.RonfeldtM.ShahanE.WilliamsonP. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055-2100.
9.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teacher: Re-imagining Teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-290.
10.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
11.
JanssenF. J. J. M.de HulluA. E. (2008). A toolkit for stimulating productive thinking. Journal of Biological Education, 43, 21-28.
12.
JanssenF. J. J. M.WestbroekH. B.van DrielJ. H. (2013). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instructional Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9296-z
13.
JanssenF. J. J. M.WestbroekH. B.DoyleW.van DrielJ. H. (2013). How to make innovations practical. Teachers College Record, 115(7), 1-43.
14.
KruglanskiA.KopetzC. (2009). The role of goal systems in self-regulation. In MorsellaE.BarghJ. A.GollwitzerP. M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 350-367). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
LampertM.GrazianiF. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning in and for practice. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491-509.
16.
LunettaV. N.HofsteinA.CloughM. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In LedermanN.AbelS. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393-441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Martin-HansenL. M. (2009). Inquiry pedagogy and the pre service science teacher. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
18.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/NGSS/
19.
PollockJ. L. (2006). Thinking about acting: Logical foundations for rational decision making. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
SchwabJ. J. (1962). The teaching of science as inquiry. In SchwabJ. J.BrandweinP. F. (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 3-130). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
SimonH. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
22.
Van de PolJ.VolmanM.BeishuizenJ. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-296.
23.
WideenM.Mayer-SmithJ.MoonB. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68, 130-178.
24.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM.StroupeD. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878-903.
