Mathematics teacher education programs often need to respond to changing expectations and standards for K-12 curriculum and accreditation. New standards for high school mathematics in the United States include a strong emphasis in statistics. This article reports results from a mixed methods cross-institutional study examining the preparedness of preservice secondary mathematics teachers to teach statistics and identifying factors and experiences that influence their preparedness. Our results suggest that the cohort of teachers entering secondary mathematics classrooms in 2015-2016 were not well prepared to teach statistics. Specific suggestions are given for how teacher education programs must rise to the challenge of preparing their graduates to teach statistics.
AllisonP. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
BaldwinW. (2000). Information no one else knows: The value of self-report. In StoneA. A.TurkkanJ. S.BachrachC. A.JobeJ. B.KurtzmanH. S.CainV. S. (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 3-7). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
7.
CobbG. (2015). Mere renovation is too little too late: We need to rethink our undergraduate curriculum from the ground up. The American Statistician, 69(4), 266-282.
8.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
9.
ConnerA.EdenfieldK. W.GleasonB. W.ErsozF. A. (2011). Impact of a content and methods course sequence on prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(6), 483-504.
10.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
FitzmauriceO.LeavyA.HanniganA. (2014). Why is statistics perceived as difficult and can practice during training change perceptions? Insights from a prospective mathematics teacher. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 33, 230-248.
13.
FranklinC. (2013). Common core state standards and the future of teacher preparation in statistics. The Mathematics Educator, 22(2), 3-10.
14.
FranklinC.BargagliottiA. E.CaseC. A.KaderG. D.SchaefferR. L.SpanglerD. A. (2015). The statistical education of teachers. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
15.
FranklinC.KaderG.MewbornD.MorenoJ.PeckR.PerryM.SchaefferR. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics ducation (GAISE) report: A pre-K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
16.
GarfieldJ.AliagaM.CobbG.CuffC.GouldR.LockR.. . . WitmerJ. (2007). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE): College report. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
17.
GrothR. E. (2013). Characterizing key developmental understandings and pedagogically powerful ideas within a statistical knowledge for teaching framework. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(2), 121-145.
Harrell-WilliamsL. M.PierceR. (2015, October). Identifying statistical concepts associated with high and low levels of self-efficacy to teach statistics in middle grades. Webinar presented for the Consortium for the Advancement of Undergraduate Statistics Education (CAUSEweb).
20.
Harrell-WilliamsL. M.SortoM. A.PierceR.LesserL. M.MurphyT. J. (2014a, July). Using the SETS instruments to investigate sources of variation in levels of pre-service teacher efficacy to teach statistics. In MakarK.de SousaB.GouldR. (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9), Flagstaff, AZ.
21.
Harrell-WilliamsL. M.SortoM. A.PierceR. L.LesserL. M.MurphyT. J. (2014b). Validation of scores from a new measure of preservice teachers’ self-efficacy to teach statistics in the middle grades. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(1), 40-50.
22.
Harrell-WilliamsL. M.SortoM. A.PierceR.LesserL. M.MurphyT. J. (2015). Identifying statistical concepts associated with high and low levels of self-efficacy to teach statistics in middle grades. Journal of Statistics Education, 23(1), 1-10. Retrived from http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v23n1/harrell-williams.pdf
23.
HillH. C.BallD. L.SchillingS. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualzing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.
JacobbeT.CaseC.WhitakerD.FotiS. (2014, July). Establishing the validity of the LOCUS assessments through an evidenced-centered design approach. In MakarK.de SousaB.GouldR. (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9), Flagstaff, AZ.
26.
JacobbeT.FotiS.CaseC.WhitakerD. (2014, July). High school (ages 14-18) students’ understanding of statistics. In MakarK.de SousaB.GouldR. (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9), Flagstaff, AZ.
27.
KonoldC.MillerC. D. (2011). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
28.
LeeH. S.HollebrandsK. F. (2011). Characterising and developing teachers’ knowledge for teaching statistics with technology. In BataneroC.BurrillG.ReadingC. (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 359-369). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
29.
LeeH. S.HollebrandsK. F.WilsonP. H. (2010). Preparing to teach mathematics with technology: An integrated approach to data analysis and probability. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
30.
LovettJ. N. (2016). The preparedness of preservice secondary mathematics teachers to teach statistics: A cross-institutional mixed methods study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, NC State University, Raleigh. Retrieved from https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/handle/1840.16/11008
31.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
33.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
34.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practice & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
35.
NewtonK. J.LeonardJ.EvansB. R.EastburnJ. A. (2012). Preservice elementary teachers’ mathematics content knowledge and teacher efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 112(5), 289-299.
36.
PalmerD. (2011). Sources of efficacy information in an inservice program for elementary teachers. Science Education, 95(4), 577-600.
RossS. H. (1989). Parts, wholes, and place value: A developmental view. The Arithmetic Teacher, 36(6), 47-51.
39.
Rubie-DaviesC. M.FlintA.McDonaldL. G. (2012). Teacher beliefs, teacher characteristics, and school contextual factors: What are the relationships?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 270-288.
40.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley.
41.
ThrasherE.StarlingT.LovettJ. N.DoerrH. M.LeeH. S. (2015, November). The influence of a graduate course on teachers’ self-efficacy to teach statistics. Paper presented at the Thirty-seventh annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, East Lansing, MI.
