In teacher education, it is imperative that course design, method of instruction, and classroom procedures align with the content. One way to achieve this may be to “flip” the classroom. While flipped classrooms have received considerable attention in recent years, much remains unknown about their effect on basic psychological needs or learning outcomes of preservice teachers. The purpose of the present study was to address this gap by utilizing a quasi-experimental design to examine differences in motivation and objective learning outcomes after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES) and grade point average (GPA) between traditional and flipped sections of a foundational educational course (N = 263). Results revealed that preservice teachers in the traditional section had significantly higher scores on two of the motivation outcomes (e.g., intrinsic and identified regulation), but that preservice teachers in the flipped sections had significantly higher scores on several indices of objective learning outcomes. Implications for teacher education are discussed.
AbeysekeraL.DawsonP. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.
BishopJ. L.VerlegerM. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education National Conference, Atlanta, GA.
4.
BlackA. E.DeciE. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
5.
BloomB. S.EngelhartM. D.FurstE. J.HillW. H.KrathwohlD. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
6.
BransfordJ. D.JohnsonM. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
7.
BreslowL. (2010). Wrestling with pedagogical change: The TEAL initiative at MIT. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 23-29.
8.
ChiuM. M. (2007). Families, economies, cultures, and science achievement in 41 countries: Country-, school-, and student-level analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 510-519. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.510
9.
CobbW. N. W. (2016). Turning the classroom upside own: Experimenting with the flipped classroom in American government. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(1), 1-14.
10.
CritzC. M.KnightD. (2013). Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educator, 38(5), 210-213.
11.
DaviesR. S.DeanD. L.BallN. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1991). A motivational approach to the self: Integration in personality. In DienstbierR. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
13.
DeLozierS. J.RhodesM. G. (2016). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 141-151.
14.
FragaL. M.HarmonJ. (2014). The flipped classroom model of learning in higher education: An investigation of preservice teachers’ perspectives and achievement. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(1), 18-27.
15.
FultonK. P. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20-24.
16.
FurtakE. M.KunterM. (2012). Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 284-316.
17.
GilboyM. B.HeinerichsS.PazzagliaG. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior, 47(1), 109-114.
18.
GuayF.VallerandR. J.BlanchardC. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24, 175-213. doi:10.1023/a:1005614228250
19.
HaerensL.AeltermanN.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB.Van PetegemS. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26-36.
20.
HallG. E.HordS. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
21.
HaoY.LeeK. S. (2016). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 250-260.
22.
JangH.ReeveJ.RyanR. M.KimA. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students?Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644-661.
23.
KasserT.DaveyJ.RyanR. M. (1992). Motivation and employee-supervisor discrepancies in a psychiatric vocational rehabilitation setting. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 175-188. doi:10.1037/h0079104
24.
KriegerN. (1992). Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: Validation and application of a census-based methodology. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 703-710.
25.
LevinB. B. (2015). The development of teachers’ beliefs. In FivesH.GillM. G. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 48-65). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
LittleC. (2015). The flipped classroom in further education: Literature review and case study. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 20(3), 265-279.
27.
McLaughlinJ. E.RothM. T.GlattD. M.GharkholonareheN.DavidsonC. A.GriffinL. M.. . . MumperR. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236-243.
28.
McMillanJ. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
29.
O’FlahertyJ.PhillipsC. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
30.
OrmrodJ. E. (2012). Test bank for “Essentials of educational psychology: Big ideas to guide effective teaching” (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
31.
PelletierL. G.FortierM. S.VallerandR. J.BriereN. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279-306.
32.
PrinceM. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
33.
ReeveJ. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175. doi:10.1080/00461520903028990
34.
ReeveJ.JangH. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218.
35.
RoehlA.ReddyS. L.ShannonG. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49.
36.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
37.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In JohnO. P.RobbinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 654-678). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence motivation (pp. 85-104). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
SmithG. A. (2008). First-day questions for the learner-centered classroom. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 17, 1-4.
40.
SmithJ. D. (2013). Student attitudes toward flipping the general chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 607-614.
41.
UnruhT.PetersM. L.WillisJ. (2016). Flip this classroom: A comparative study. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 38-58.
42.
VansteenkisteM.SierensE.GoossensL.SoenensB.DochyF.MouratidisA.. . . BeyersW. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431-439.
43.
VansteenkisteM.SimonsJ.LensW.SheldonK. M.DeciE. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246-260.
44.
VaughanM. (2014). Flipping the learning: An investigation into the use of the flipped classroom model in an introductory teaching course. Education and Research Perspectives, 41, 25-41.
45.
VaughanM. (2015). The flipped classroom: The benefits for preservice teachers. In RutledgeD.SlykhuisD. (Eds.), Proceedings from SITE 2015—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education international conference (pp. 2622-2624). Las Vegas, NV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
46.
WilsonS. G. (2013). The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 193-199.
YoshidaH. (2016). Perceived usefulness of “flipped learning” on instructional design for elementary and secondary education: With focus on pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 430-434.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
