We investigated the factorial structure of preservice teachers’ academic self-concept with regard to three domains of professional knowledge (content knowledge [CK], pedagogical content knowledge [PCK], and pedagogical/psychological knowledge [PPK]). We also analyzed the relation between preservice teachers’ academic self-concept and their professional knowledge. The sample consisted of N = 631 German preservice secondary teachers in biology and physics. To analyze the factorial structure of the academic self-concept, we applied confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) and compared different models of complexity. Results confirmed that preservice teachers’ academic self-concept is empirically separable into CK, PCK, and PPK. Furthermore, the self-concept scales were positively related to the corresponding test scores in the professional knowledge domains. Our results revealed that preservice teachers’ academic self-concept is differentiated at a very early state of teacher education and reflects CK, PCK, and PPK performance. Hence, self-concept measures seem to provide an alternative means to assess preservice teachers’ professional knowledge in comparison with traditional performance measures.
AbellS. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In AbellS. K.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105-1149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
ArensA. K.YeungA. S.CravenR. G.HasselhornM. (2011). The twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: Domain specificity and separation between competence and affect components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 970-981.
3.
AspyD. N.BuhlerJ. H. (1975). The effect of teachers’ inferred self concept upon student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 68(10), 386-389. doi:10.1080/00220671.1975.10884808
4.
BallD. L.HillH. C.BassH. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?American Educator, 59(1), 14-17, 20-22, 43-46.
5.
BallD. L.LubienskiS.MewbornD. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433-456). New York, NY: Macmillan.
6.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BaumertJ.KunterM. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften [Keyword: Professional competence of teachers]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9, 469-520.
8.
BaumertJ.KunterM. (2011). Das Kompetenzmodell von COACTIV [The competence model of COACTIV]. In KunterM.BaumertJ.BlumW.KlusmannU.KraussS.NeubrandM. (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften: Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV (pp. 29-53). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
9.
BaumertJ.KunterM.BlumW.BrunnerM.VossT.JordanA.. . . TsaiY.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180.
10.
BraunE.GusyB.LeidnerB.HannoverB. (2008). Das Berliner Evaluationsinstrument für selbsteingeschätzte, studentische Kompetenzen (BEvaKomp) [The Berlin Evaluation instrument for self-evaluated student competences]. Diagnostica, 54(1), 30-42.
11.
CortinaK. S.ThamesM. H. (2013). Teacher education in Germany. In KunterM.BaumertJ.BlumW.KlusmannU.KraussS.NeubrandM. (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 49-62). New York, NY: Springer.
EvenR. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2), 94-116.
14.
FriedmanI. A.FarberB. A. (1992). Professional self-concept as a predictor of teacher burnout. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 28-35.
15.
GhazviniS. D. (2011). Relationships between academic self-concept and academic performance in high school students. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1034-1039.
16.
GoslingS. D.JohnO. P.CraikK. H.RobinsR. W. (1998). Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1337-1349.
17.
GrossmanP. L.SchoenfeldA. H.LeeC. (2005). Teaching subject matter. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. D. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 201-231). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
GroßschedlJ.HarmsU.KleickmannT.GlowinskiI. (2015). Preservice biology teachers’ professional knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 291-318.
19.
GuskeyT. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69.
20.
HashwehM. Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109-120.
21.
HattieJ. A. (1992). Towards a model of schooling: A synthesis of meta-analyses. Australian Journal of Education, 36, 5-13.
22.
HillH. C.BallD. L.SchillingS. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.
23.
HillH. C.RowanB.BallD. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
24.
HohensteinF.ZimmermannF.KleickmannT.KöllerO.MöllerJ. (2014). Sind die bildungswissenschaftlichen Standards für die Lehramtsausbildung in den Curricula der Hochschulen angekommen? [Have the education standards for teacher training programmes arrived in the university curriculum?]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17, 497-507.
25.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
26.
HughesT. M. (1987, November). The prediction of teacher burnout through personality type, critical thinking and self-concept.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Mobile, AL.
27.
KleickmannT.GroßschedlJ.HarmsU.HeinzeA.HerzogS.HohensteinF.. . . ZimmermannF. (2014). Professionswissen von Lehramtsstudierenden der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fächer- Testentwicklung im Rahmen des Projekts KiL [Professional knowledge of preservice mathematics and science teachers—Test construction in the project KIL]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 42(3), 280-288.
28.
KrögerJ.BooneW.NeumannK.PetersenS. (2015). Analysis of pre-service physics teachers’ CK and PCK. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29.
LeeE.LuftJ. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343-1363.
30.
MagnussonS.KrajcikJ.BorkoH. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Gess-NewsomeJ.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic.
31.
MarkusH.WurfE. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
32.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163.
33.
MarshH. W.MartinA. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 59-77.
34.
MöllerJ.PohlmannB.KöllerO.MarshH. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1129-1167.
35.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2013). Mplus Version 7.11 [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Author. Available from http://statmodel.com
36.
PintrichP. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
37.
PurkeyW. W. (1970). Self-concept and school achievement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
RetelsdorfJ.KöllerO.MöllerJ. (2014). Reading achievement and reading self-concept- testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21-30.
39.
SchmidtW.BlömekeS.TattoM. T. (2011). Teacher education matters. A study of middle school mathematics teacher preparation in six countries. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
40.
SchmidtW. H.TattoM. T.BankovK.BlömekeS.CedilloT.CoganL.. . . SchwilleJ. (2007). The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. East Lansing: Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University.
Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany [KMK]. (2008). Ländergemeinsame inhaltliche Anforderungen für die Fachwissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken in der Lehrerbildung [Content requirements for subject-related studies and subject-related didactics in teacher training which apply to all Länder]. Retrieved from http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16-Standards-Lehrerbildung.pdf
43.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407-441.
44.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
45.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
46.
SpainJ. S.EatonL. G.FunderD. C. (2000). Perspective on personality: The relative accuracy of self versus others for the prediction of emotion and behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 837-867.
47.
TattoM. T.SchwilleJ.SenkS. L.IngvarsonL.RowleyG.PeckR.. . . ReckaseM. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Student Achievement.
48.
VillaA.CalveteE. (2001). Development of the teacher self-concept evaluation scale and its relation to burnout. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 239-255.
49.
VossT.KunterM.BaumertJ. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952-969.
50.
VossT.KunterM.SeizJ.HoehneV.BaumertJ. (2014). Die Bedeutung des pädagogisch-psychologischen Wissens von angehenden Lehrkräften für die Unterrichtsqualität [The significance of the pedagogical-psychological knowledge of future teachers for the quality of teaching]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60(2), 184-201.
51.
YeungA. S.CravenR. G.KaurG. (2014). Teachers’ self-concept and valuing of learning: Relations with teaching approaches and beliefs about students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 305-320.
52.
YuC. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
