We examine edTPA (a teacher performance assessment) implementation at one private university during the first year that our state required this exam for initial teaching certification. Using data from semi-structured interviews with 19 teacher educators from 12 programs as well as public information on edTPA pass rates, we explore whether the edTPA served its intended roles as a gatekeeper to the teaching profession and a catalyst for curriculum change. Although the edTPA did not serve as gatekeeper in our context, we did find a wide variety of consequential program-level gatekeeping practices. To explore the test’s function as a curriculum improvement lever, we created weighted change scores to represent the range of edTPA-related curricular changes across 12 programs. We found a wide range of curricular responses to the edTPA, from marginalization of the assessment to deep edTPA integration in program coursework. Finally, we explore teacher educators’ analyses of the edTPA as an instructional tool.
AdkinsA.KlassP.PalmerE. (2015, January). Identifying demographic and preservice teacher performance predictors of success on the edTPA. Paper Presented at the 2015 Hawaii International Conference on Education, Honolulu.
CantrellS.FullertonJ.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2008). National board certification and teacher effectiveness: Evidence from a random assignment experiment (No. w14608). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
ChungR. R. (2008). Beyond assessment: Performance assessments in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 8-28.
5.
Chung WeiR.PecheoneR. L. (2010). Assessment for learning in preservice teacher education: Performance-based assessments. In KennedyM. (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (pp. 69-132). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
6.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
CroweE. (2010). Measuring what matters: A stronger accountability model for teacher education. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518518.pdf
Darling-HammondL. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
11.
Darling-HammondL.NewtonS. P.WeiR. C. (2013). Developing and assessing beginning teacher effectiveness: The potential of performance assessments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(3), 179-204.
DoverA. G.SchultzB. D.SmithK.DugganT. J. (2015). Who’s preparing our candidates? edTPA, localized knowledge and the outsourcing of teacher evaluation. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17914
14.
DuckorB.CastellanoK. E.TellezK.WihardiniD.WilsonM. (2014). Examining the internal structure evidence for the Performance Assessment for California Teachers: A validation study of the Elementary Literacy Teaching Event for Tier I teacher licensure. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 402-420. doi:10.1177/0022487114542517
15.
GoodwinA. L.OylerC. (2008). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Deciding who is ready to teach. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD. J.DemersK. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (pp. 468-489). New York, NY: Routledge.
KnowlesK. T.PlakeB. S.RobinsonD. Z.MitchellK. J. (Eds.). (2001). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
19.
KnudsonR. E.TurleyS. (2000). University supervisors and at-risk student teachers. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(3), 175-186.
20.
KoretzD. M. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
KowalskiK.ChittendenE.SpicerW.JonesJ.TocciC. (1997, March). Professional development in the context of National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification: Implications beyond Certification. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED412257.pdf
MadeloniB.GorlewskiJ. (2013, June21). Radical imagination, not standardization: Critical teacher education and the edTPA (ID No. 17163). Teachers College Record. Available from http://www.tcrecord.org
24.
MeuwissenK. W.ChoppinJ. M. (2015). Preservice teachers’ adaptations to tensions associated with the edTPA during its early implementation in New York and Washington states. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, Article 103. doi:10.14507/epaa.v23.2078
25.
MitchellK. J. (2001). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
ParkesK. A.PowellS. R. (2015). Is the edTPA the right choice for evaluating teacher readiness?Arts Education Policy Review, 116(2), 103-113. doi:10.1080/10632913.2014.944964
30.
PecheoneR. L.ChungR. R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education: The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 22-36.
31.
PeckC.McDonaldM. (2013). Creating “cultures of evidence” in teacher education: Context, policy and practice in three high data use programs. The New Educator, 9(1), 12-28.
32.
PeckC.Singer-GabellaM.SloanT.LinS. (2014). Driving blind: Why we need standardized performance assessment in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1), 8-30.
RavitchS. M. (2014). The transformative power of taking an inquiry stance on practice: Practitioner research as narrative and counter-narrative. Perspectives on Urban Education, 11(1), 5-10.
35.
RoseD. (2001). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(4), 64-67.
36.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity. (2013). 2013 edTPA field test: Summary report. Stanford, CA: Author.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity. (2014b). edTPA support and assessment state policies and educator preparation program (EPP): Implementation support dashboard. Retrieved from http://edtpa.aacte.org/state-policy
39.
The State Education Department: University of the State of New York. (2014a). Emergency Adoption of Amendments to Section 52.21 and Part 80 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education to provide teacher candidates, who apply for teacher certification prior to June 30, 2015 and who take and fail the Teacher Performance Assessment (edTPA), with the option of obtaining an initial certificate if the candidate passes the ATS-W prior to June 30, 2015 and subsequent to receiving his/her score on the edTPA. Retrieved from http://www.regents.nysed.gov/common/regents/files/413hea4Revision2.pdf
40.
The State Education Department: University of the State of New York. (2014b). New York: Race to the top scope of work update. Retrieved from http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/docs/statesow.pdf
41.
SudzinaM. R.KnowlesJ. G. (1993). Personal, professional and contextual circumstances of student teachers who “fail”: Setting a course for understanding failure in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 254-262.
42.
SuperfineB. M.GottliebJ. J.SmylieM. A. (2012). The expanding federal role in teacher workforce policy. Educational Policy, 26(1), 58-78.
WhittakerA.NelsonC. (2013). Assessment with an “end in view.”The New Educator, 9(1), 77-93.
45.
YoungsP.OddenA.PorterA. C. (2003). State policy related to teacher licensure. Educational Policy, 17(2), 217-236. doi:10.1177/0895904803017002002
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
