This article examines the teacher preparation program learning opportunities afforded future lower secondary mathematics teachers and future elementary teachers who may teach mathematics. Data from U.S. participation in the recent international Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics are explored against international profiles to address a critical issue oft cited in the teacher education literature: Given the finite time available, what sort of balance is provided for course work across the areas of mathematics content, mathematics pedagogy, and general pedagogy? Results demonstrated major differences for lower secondary preparation programs in both the types of topics or courses covered and the relative emphasis across the three areas in those countries statistically outperforming the United States in comparison to U.S. programs. Similar but less striking differences were noted among elementary programs. These results should provide important empirical evidence relevant to the ongoing policy dialog concerning identifying the specific content of a quality teacher preparation program.
Abell Foundation. (2001a). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. Baltimore : Author. Retrieved September 30, 2003, from http://www.abell.org/pubsitems/ed_cert_1101.pdf
2.
Abell Foundation. (2001b). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality-Appendix. Review of research teacher certification and effective teaching. Baltimore: Author. Retrieved September 30, 2003, from http://www.abell.org/pubsitems/ed_cert_appendix_1101.pdf
3.
Akiba, M., LeTendre, G., & Scribner, J.P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries around the world. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369-387.
4.
American Federation of Teachers. (2009). Importing educators: Causes and consequences of international teacher recruitment . Washington, DC: Author.
5.
Blömeke, S. ( 2004). Empirische Befunde zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildung [Empirical findings for the effectiveness of the teacher formation]. In S. Blömeke, P. Reinhold, G. Tulodziecki, & J. Wildt (Eds.), Handbuch lehrerbildung [Manual teacher formation] (pp. 59-91). Bad Heilbrunn /Braunschweig, Germany: Klinkhardt /Westermann.
6.
Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. ( 2011). Teacher education effectiveness: Quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 154-171.
7.
Bromme, R. ( 1997). Kompetenzen, funktionen, und unterrichtliches handeln des lehrers [Authority, functions, and instructional acting of the teacher] . In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Psychologie des Unterrichts und der Schule [Psychology of instruction and the school] (pp. 177-212). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
8.
Carroll, J.B. ( 1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723-733.
9.
Center for Research in Math and Science Education. ( 2010, April). Breaking the cycle: An international comparison of U.S. mathematics teacher preparation. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
10.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. ( 2002). Defining "highly qualified teachers": What does "scientifically-based research" actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13-25.
12.
Dumais, J., & Meinck, S. (in press). Estimation weights, participation rates, and sampling error . In M. T. Tatto (Ed.), TEDS-M Technical Report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
13.
Eraut, M. ( 1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Routledge Falmer.
14.
Eurydice. (2001). The teaching profession in Europe: Profile, trends and concerns (Vol. 1). Brussels: Author .
15.
Goldhaber, D.D., & Brewer, D.J. ( 2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129-145.
16.
Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. ( 1995). Didaktik und/oder curriculum: Grundprobleme einer international vergleichenden didaktik [Didactics and/or curriculum: Basic problems of an internationally comparing didactics]. In S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik und/oder curriculum [Didactics and/or curriculum] (pp. 9-34). Weinheim , Germany: Beltz.
17.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2007). Sample Preparation Manual (TEDS-M Ref. No. MS-02-01). Hamburg: IEA Data Processing Center, Sampling Unit.
18.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. ( 1995). Model standards in mathematics for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
Leithwood, K., Edge, K., & Jantzi, D. ( 1999). Educational accountability: The state of the art. Gutersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers .
20.
McDonnell, L.M. ( 1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305-322.
21.
Monk, D.H., & King, J.A. ( 1994). Multilevel teacher resource effects on pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science: The case of teacher subject-matter preparation . In R. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Choices and consequences: Contemporary policy issues in education (pp. 29-58). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
22.
Murray, F.B. ( 2000). The role of accreditation reform in teacher education . Educational Policy, 14(1), 40-59.
23.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. Report of the National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future. Woodbridge, VA: Author.
24.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. ( 2000). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC : Author.
25.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. ( 2004). Education at a glance: OECD Indicators 2004. Paris: Author.
26.
Schmidt, W.H., Blömeke, S., & Tatto, M.T. ( 2011). Teacher education matters: A study of middle school mathematics teacher preparation in six countries. New York: Teachers College Press.
27.
Schmidt, W.H., Houang, R., Cogan, L., Blömeke, S., Tatto, M.T., Hsieh, F.J., et al. (2008). Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: Its structure and how it varies across six countries . ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 735-747.
28.
Schmidt, W.H., Jorde, D., Cogan, L.S., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., Moser, U., et al. (1996). Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science teaching in six countries. New York: Springer.
29.
Schmidt, W.H., & Maier, A. ( 2009). Opportunity to learn. In G. Sykes, B. L. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook on education policy research (pp. 541-549). New York: Routledge .
30.
Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C., Cogan, L.S., Jakwerth, P.M., & Houang, R.T. ( 1999). Facing the consequences: Using TIMSS for a closer look at U.S. mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
31.
Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C.C., Houang, R.T., Wang, H., Wiley, D., Cogan, L.S., et al. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Schmidt, W.H., Wang, H.A., & McKnight, C.C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525-529.
33.
Spencer, L., & Spencer, S. ( 1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley.
34.
Taconis, R., Van der Plas, P., & Van der Sanden, J. (2004). The development of professional competencies by educational assistants in school-based teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 215-240.
35.
Tatto, M.T., Schwille, J., Senk, S.L., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. ( 2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. East Lansing: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
36.
Weinert, F.E. ( 2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (S. 45-66). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
37.
Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf
