In the present study, the role of five categories of characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context was studied in relation to teacher learning. Both self-reports and student perceptions were used to measure teacher learning. Data were gathered on 28 secondary school teachers (14 coaching dyads). A mixed-method approach was adopted combining quantitative and qualitative data. To study the associations between five categories of characteristics of a peer coaching context (independent variable) and teacher learning (dependent variable), questionnaire results (quantitative data) and digital diaries (qualitative data) were examined. It was found that teachers learn when they are intrinsically motivated to take part in professional development programs; when they feel a certain pressure toward experimenting with new instructional methods; and when they are able to discuss their experiences within a safe, constructive, and trustworthy reciprocal peer coaching environment.
Ackland, R. (1991). A review of the peer coaching literature, Journal of Staff Development, 12, 22-26.
2.
Bergen, T., Engelen, A., & Derksen, K. (2006). The quality of coaching in relation to the professional development of teachers. In F. K. Oser , F. Achtenhagen, & U. Renold (Eds.), Competence oriented teacher training. Old research demands and new pathways (97-114). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
3.
Bolhuis, S.M. (2000). Naar Zelfstandig Leren: wat doen en denken docenten? [Towards self-regulated learning: how do teachers act and think?]. Doctoral dissertation, Garant-Uitgevers, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
4.
Bolhuis, S. (2006). Professional development between teachers' practical knowledge and external demands: Plea for a broad socialconstructivist and critical approach. In F. K. Oser, F. Achtenhagen, & U. Renold (Eds.), Competence oriented teacher training. Old research demands and new pathways (pp. 237-249). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
5.
Bolhuis, S., & Voeten, M.J.M. (2004). Teachers' conceptions of student learning and own learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 77-98.
6.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
7.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning . Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
8.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer .
10.
D'Abate, C.P., Eddy, E.R., & Tannenbaum, S.I. (2003). What's in a name? A literature-based approach to understanding mentoring, coaching, and other constructs that describe developmental interactions. Human Resource Development Review , 2(4), 360-384.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Changing conceptions of teaching and teacher development . Teacher Education Quarterly, 22(4), 9-26.
12.
Engelen, A. (2002). Coaching binnenstebuiten; een onderzoek naar coaching van docenten door docenten; dissertation [Coaching inside out. A study into coaching for teachers by teachers]. Dissertation, Nijmegen University Press, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
13.
Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
14.
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage .
15.
Gallacher, K. (1997). Supervision, mentoring, and coaching. In J. A. M. C. C. PamelaJ. Winton (Eds.), Reforming personnel preparation in early intervention: Issues, models & practical strategies (pp. 191-215). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
Garet, M.S., Cronen, S., Eaton, M., Kurki, A., Ludwig, M., Jones, W., et al. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Science, U.S. Department of Education.
17.
Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-946.
18.
Glazer, E.M., & Hannafin, M.J. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 179-193.
19.
Gottesman, B. (2000). Peer coaching for educators. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
20.
Guskey, T.R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381-391.
21.
Hall, J.K., & Davis, J. (1995). What we know about the relationships that develop between cooperating and student teachers. Foreign Language Annuals, 28, 32-48.
22.
Hargreaves, A., & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: contrived collegiality, collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 227-241.
23.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1992). Understanding teacher development. New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development. A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning professions. Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Hoekstra, A. (2007). Experienced teachers' informal learning in the workplace. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed method research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher , 33, 14-26.
28.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
29.
Kazemi, E., & Hubbard, A. (2008). New directions for the design and study of professional development. Attending to the coevolution of teachers' participation across contexts. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 428-441.
30.
Kohler, F.W., & Ezell, H.K. (1999). Promoting changes in teachers' conducts of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. Journal of Special Education, 33, 154-166.
31.
Korthagen, F.A.J., & Kessels, J.P.A.M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher , 28(4), 4-17.
32.
Ladyshewsky, R.K. (2006). Building cooperation in peer coaching relationships: Understanding the relationships between reward structure, learner preparedness, coaching skill and learner engagement. Psychotherapy, 92, 4-10.
33.
Licklider, B.L. (1995). The effects of peer coaching cycles on teacher use of a complex teaching skill and teachers' sense of efficacy. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9, 55-68.
34.
Little, J.W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 15(2), 129-151.
35.
Little, J.W. (2006). Professional development and professional community in the learning-centered school. Arlington, VA: National Education Association.
36.
Mathijsen, I.C.H. (2006). Denken en handelen van docenten [Teachers' cognitions and actions]. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University , Utrecht, the Netherlands.
37.
Murray, S., Ma, X., & Mazur, J. (2008). Effects of peer coaching on teachers' collaborative interactions and students' mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 203-212.
38.
Oolbekkink-Marchand, H.W. (2006). Teachers' perspectives on self-regulated learning. An exploratory study in secondary and university education. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, Leiden , the Netherlands.
39.
Richardson, V. (1994). Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
Rink, F. (2005). Diversity and small group decision making. Towards a social identity framework for studying the effects of task-related differences in dyads and groups. Dissertation, Offsetdrukkerij Ridderprint B.V., Leiden.
41.
Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.
42.
Swafford, J. (1998). Teachers supporting teachers through peer coaching . Support for Learning, 13, 54-58.
43.
van Eekelen, I.M., Boshuizen, H.P.A., & Vermunt, J.D. (2005). Self-regulation in higher education teacher learning . Higher Education, 50, 447-472.
44.
Van Veen, K. (2008). Analyzing teachers' working conditions from the perspective of teachers as professionals In J. Ax & P. Ponte (Eds.), The profession of teacher in Dutch educational praxis. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
45.
Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., Meirink, J., Hoekstra, A., & Imants, J. (2009, April). Teacher learning: The importance of teachers' sense-making of workplace conditions. Paper presented at the conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
46.
Van Zoest, L.R., Ziebarth, S.W., & Breyfolge, M.L. (2002). Self-perceived and observed practices of secondary school mathematics teachers. Teacher Development, 6, 245-268.
47.
Vermetten, I.J., Lodewijks, H.G., & Vermunt, J.D. (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientations in strategy use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 149-170.
48.
Wong, K., & Nicotera, A. (2003). Enhancing teacher quality: Peer coaching as a professional development strategy. A preliminary synthesis of the literature (Publication Series No. 5). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
49.
Zwart, R.C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T.C.M., & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 165-187.
50.
Zwart, R.C., Wubbels, T., Bolhuis, S., & Bergen, T.C.M. (2008). Teacher learning through reciprocal peer coaching: An analysis of activity sequences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 982-1002.
