This study examined how secondary teachers (junior and senior high school teachers) of English as a foreign language (EFL) in Japan participated in collaborative action research and engaged in their professional development over four years. In particular, little is known as to how EFL teachers challenge their beliefs and implement innovative practices based on communicative language teaching (CLT) through teacher learning processes. Using a mixed methods design, the study identified three developmental stages regardless of years of teaching experience: (1) Challenging teacher beliefs through TESOL classes and modeling teachers who have done similar action research (AR) through trial and error teaching as they practice communicative activities; (2) Making sense of teaching through adapting and modifying theories of CLT; and (3) Building confidence in teaching by actually seeing students change. These stages overlap and are not mutually exclusive, depending on teacher and teaching context. The study reveals teachers’ dynamic learning processes and professional development.
AlcoffL. (1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5–32.
2.
ArnottS. (2017). Second language education and micro-policy implementation in Canada: The meaning of pedagogical change. Language Teaching Research, 21, 258–284.
3.
AtkinsonD.ChurchillE.NishinoT.OkadaH. (2018). Language learning great and small: Environmental support structures and learning opportunities in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition and teaching. Modern Language Journal, 102, 471–493.
4.
AvalosB. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20.
5.
BallD.L.CohenD. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BorgS. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
7.
BransfordJ.D.BrownA.L.CockingR.R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
BrownH.D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. 3rd edition. New York: Pearson Longman.
9.
BurnsA. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BurnsA. (2005). Action research. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 241–256). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
CaoY. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 789–814.
12.
CarrW.KemmisS. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. London: Falmer.
13.
ClandininD.J.SchaeferL.LongJ.S., et al. (2013). Teacher education: A question of sustaining teachers. In ZhuX.ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for the 21st century (pp. 251–262). Berlin: Springer.
14.
CreswellJ.W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 45–68). 2nd edition. London: Sage.
15.
CrookesG. (1993). Action research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14, 130–144.
16.
CrossR. (2010). Language teaching as sociocultural activity: Rethinking language teacher practice. Modern Language Journal, 94, 434–452.
17.
Darling-HammondL.McLaughlinM.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.
18.
DavisonC. (2013). Innovation in assessment: Common misconceptions and problems. In HylandK.WongL.C. (Eds.), Innovation and change in English language education (pp. 263–276). London: Routledge.
19.
EarlL.M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20.
ElbazF. (1991). Research on teachers’ knowledge: The evolution of a discourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 1–19.
21.
FivesH.GillM.G. (Eds.) (2015). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. London: Routledge.
22.
FirthJ. (1930). Tongues of men/Speech. London: Oxford University Press.
23.
FreemanD.JohnsonK.E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397–417.
24.
GebhardJ.G. (2005). Awareness of teaching through action research: Examples, benefits and limitations. JALT Journal, 27, 53–69.
25.
GlensneC.PeshkinA. (1992). Becoming qualitative researcher. New York: Longman.
26.
GolombekP.DoranM. (2014). Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 102–111.
27.
HafnerC.A. (2015). Remix culture and English language teaching: The expression of learner voice in digital multimodal compositions. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 486–509.
28.
HargreavesA. (2013). Push, pull, and nudge: The future of teaching and educational change. In ZhuX.ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for the 21st century (pp. 217–236). Berlin: Springer.
29.
HawleyW.D.ValliL. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the Learning professions: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
JohnsonK.E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 439–452.
32.
JohnsonK.E. (2018). Studying language teacher cognition: Understanding and enacting theoretically consistent instructional practices. Language Teaching Research, 22, 259–263.
33.
JohnsonR.B.OnwuegbuzieA.J.TurnerL.A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.
34.
JosselsonR. (2007). The ethical attitude in narrative research. In ClandininD.J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 537–566). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Karavas-DoukasE. (1996). Using attitude scales to investigate teachers’ attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50, 187–198.
36.
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (Eds.). (1986). The action research planner. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
37.
KleinsasserR.C. (1993). A tale of two technical cultures: Foreign language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 373–383.
KleinsasserR.C. (2013). Language teachers: Research and studies in language(s) education, teaching, and learning in Teaching and Teacher Education, 1985–2012. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 86–96.
40.
KrathwohlD.R. (1993). Methods of educational and social sciences research: An integrated approach. New York: Longman.
41.
KubanylovaM.FeryokA. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. Modern Language Journal, 99, 435–449.
42.
KwoO. (2013). Professional learning as a moral drive from critical discourse. In ZhuX.ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for the 21st century (pp. 263–279). Berlin: Springer.
43.
Larsen-FreemanD.FreemanD. (2008). Language moves: The place of ‘foreign’ languages in classroom teaching and learning. Review of Research in Education, 32, 147–186.
44.
LeeJ.F.VanPattenB. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
LiebermanA. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591–596.
46.
LiebermanA.MillerL. (1990). Teacher development in professional practice schools. Teachers College Record, 92, 105–122.
47.
LightbownP.M.SpadaN. (2006). How languages are learned. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
LincolnY.S.GubaE.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49.
LittleJ.W. (1986). Seductive images and organizational realities in professional development. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Rethinking school improvement: Research, craft, and concept (pp. 26–44). New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
LittleJ.W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129–151.
51.
LortieD.C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
MalinowskiB. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In OgdenC.RichardsI. (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296–336). London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Truber.
53.
Martinez-AdrianM.Gallardo-del-PuertoBasterrecheaM. (2017). On self-reported use of communication strategies by CLIL learners in primary education. Language Teaching Research, 23, 39–57.
54.
McLaughlinM.W. (1993). What matters most in teachers’ workplace context? In LittleJ.W.McLaughlinM.W. (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 79–103). New York: Teachers College Press.
55.
McLaughlinM.W.TalbertJ. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
MillesG.E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
57.
MutohN.SatoK.HakamadaA.TsujiH.ShintaniS. (2009). Collaborative action research: Teacher and curriculum development. In StokeA.M. (Ed.), JALT 2008 conference proceedings (pp. 53–66). Tokyo: JALT.
58.
NishinoT. (2011). Japanese high school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding communicative language teaching. JALT Journal, 33, 131–156.
59.
NishinoT. (2012). Modeling teacher beliefs and practices in context: A multimethods approach. Modern Language Journal, 96, 380–399.
60.
PacekD. (1996). Lessons to be learnt from negative evaluation. ELT Journal, 50, 335–343.
61.
PajaresM.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
62.
PenningtonM. (1996). When input becomes intake: Tracing the sources of teachers’ attitude change. In FreemanD.RichardsJ. (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 320–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
QuinteroE. (Eds.). (2017). Teaching in context: The social side of education reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
64.
RichardsonV. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–9.
65.
RichardsonV. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). 2nd edition. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
66.
RosenholtzS.J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace. New York: Longman.
67.
RussR.S.SherinB.L.SherinM.G. (2016). What constitutes teacher learning? In GitomerD.H.BellC.A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 391–438). 5th edition. Washington, DC: AERA.
68.
SatoK. (2002). Practical understandings of CLT and teacher development. In SavignonS.J. (Ed.), Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education (pp. 41–81). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69.
SatoK. (2003). Starting a local teacher study group. In MurpheyT. (Ed.), Extending professional contributions (pp. 97–104). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
70.
SatoK.HiranoM. (2014). School-wide collaborative action research for curriculum development. In SonodaN.KrauseA. (Eds.), JALT 2013 conference proceedings (pp. 130–141). Tokyo: JALT.
71.
SatoK.KleinsasserR.C. (1999). Communicative language teaching (CLT): Practical understandings. Modern Language Journal, 83, 494–517.
72.
SatoK.KleinsasserR.C. (2004). Beliefs, practices, and interactions of teachers in Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 797–816.
73.
SatoK.TakahashiK. (2008). Curriculum revitalization in a Japanese high school through teacher collaboration. In HayesD.SharkeyJ. (Eds.), Revitalizing a program for school-age learners through curricular innovation (pp. 205–237). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
74.
SatoK.IwaiR.KatoM.KushiroM. (2009). Focus-on-form instruction (FFI) and its effect on student learning. In StokeA.M (Ed.), JALT 2008 conference proceedings (pp. 521–547). Tokyo: JALT.
75.
SavignonS.J. (Ed.). (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
76.
SavignonS.J. (2013). Communicative language teaching. In ByramM.HuA. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 134–140). New York: Routledge.
77.
SilvermanD. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text, and interaction. London: Sage.
78.
SkottJ. (2015). The promises, problems, and prospects of research on teachers’ beliefs. In FivesH.GillM.G. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 13–30). London: Routledge.
79.
SmylieM.A. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In GuskyT.R.HubermanM. (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms & practices (pp. 92–113). New York: Teachers College Press.
80.
SowaP.A. (2009). Understanding our learners and developing reflective practice: Conducting action research with English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1026–1032.
81.
TahiraM. (2012). Behind MEXT’s new course of study guidelines. The Language Teacher, 36, 3–8.
82.
TeemantA. (2018). Reframing the space between: Teachers and learners in context. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 6 June 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1362168818777527.
83.
TsuiA.B.M. (2012). Teacher education and teacher development. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Volume II (pp. 21–39). New York: Routledge.
84.
WallaceM. (1996). Structured reflection: The role of the professional project. In FreemanD.RichardsJ. (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 281–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85.
WallerW. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
86.
ZeichnerK.M.NoffkeS.E. (2001). Practitioner research. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research of teaching (pp. 298–330). 4th edition. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
