Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines data from nine statewide administrations of the Idaho Comprehensive Literacy Assessment (ICLA) over three-years. The ICLA measures pre-service teachers' knowledge of research-based content and pedagogy related to reading instruction and assessment. The purpose of this article was first to examine pre-service candidates' performance on areas of literacy knowledge. Candidates scored highest when matching literacy terms to definitions; they were mildly less successful matching terms to descriptions of research-based instructional activities; moderately less successful when asked for words containing specified phonic patterns from a passage; and least successful when addressing essay-formatted scenario questions. Idaho literacy instructors have used this information to inform them of their teaching effectiveness. A second purpose of this article was to highlight the challenges and benefits for faculty and programs interested in adopting a similar testing model. The article also points out the organizational and political constraints that can delay adoption and use.

Keywords

literacy assessment elementary teacher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anghoff, W.H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement, 2e (pp. 508-600 ). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Anders, P.L. , Hoffman, J.V. , and Duffy, G.G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In M. L. Kamil , P. B. Mosenthal , P. D. Pearson , & R. Barr (Eds.) Handbook of reading research (Volume III, pp. 719-742). Mahwah, JN: Erlbaum.

Canney, G.F. (1998). A study of Idaho fourth grade students' reading levels. Portals, 6(1), 7-10.

Canney, G.F. (1999). A response to Pehrsson and Denner: Design and implications of the Idaho fourth grade reading study. Portals , 6(2), 13-19.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). What matters most: A Competent teacher for every child. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), 193-200.

Duffy, G.G. , & Hoffman, J.V. (1999). In pursuit of an illusion: The flawed search of a perfect method. Reading Teacher, 53, 10-16.

Evaluations and Interventions, Idaho Statute 33-1616. (1999). Retrieved November 7, 2007, from http://www.3.state.id.us/cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=330160016.K

Extended Year Reading Intervention Program, Idaho Statute 33-1615 (1999 ). Retrieved November 7, 2007, from http://www.3.state.id.us/cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=330160015.K

Glaser, D.R. (1998). Comprehensive literacy plan Grades K-8 for the state of Idaho. Boise, ID: Lee David Pesky Center for Learning Enrichment.

10.

Hoover, H.D. , Hieronymus, A.N. , Frisbie, D.A. , Dunbar, S.B. , Oberley, K.R. , Cantor, N.K. , et al. (1993). Iowa Test of Basic Skills, norms and score conversions: Form K. Chicago: Riverside .

11.

International Reading Association, Professional Standards and Ethics Committee. (1998). Standards for reading professionals (Rev. ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

12.

Idaho Comprehensive Literacy Committee. (1998 ). A survey of reading practices and concerns among Idaho elementary teachers and principals K-8. Unpublished document, Idaho State Board of Education, Boise.

13.

Karlsen, R.M. , & Gardner, E.F. (1995). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Tests (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.

14.

Leslie, L. , & Caldwell, J. (1995). The qualitative reading inventory-II. New York: HarperCollins College.

15.

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Educators. (2002). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC: Author.

16.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child, Health, and Human Development. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.cfm

17.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107-110 (2001). Retrieved November 7, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=ln

18.

Rumelhart, D. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

19.

Shulman, L.S. , & Quinlan, K.M. (1996). The comparative psychology of school subjects D. C. Berliner & R. C Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology. (pp. 399-422) New York: Simon & Schuster McMillan.

20.

Snow, E. C. , Burns, M. S. , & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

21.

Squires, D. , Blacklock, K. , Christy, C. , Nelson, C. , Palmer, R. , & Canney, G. (2004). The Idaho Comprehensive Literacy Assessment study guide. Retrieved Retrieved January 12, 2009 from http://challenge.isu.edu/literacy/icla2004/.

22.

Squires, D. , Canney, G.F. , & Trevisan, M.S. (2004). There is another way: The faculty-developed Idaho Comprehensive Literacy Assessment for K-8 preservice teachers. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(62). Retrieved November 7, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n62

23.

Squires, D. , Trevisan, M.S. , & Canney, G.F. (2006). Investigating form comparability in the Idaho Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: Matters of fairness and transparency. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 369-380.

24.

Teacher Preparation, Idaho Statute 33-1207A (1999). Retrieved November 7, 2007, from http://www.3.state.id.us/cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=330120007A.K

Minding the Gate

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References